A
_Abyssinia
Guest
American association of Pro-life Obstetricians & Gynaecologists has an article up of which the following is an except from:I followed the link to the original article that the CNA article provided to see what source they were using for the abortion bit. Seems the original article was changed at some point as it now reads:
What a Woman Should Know about Birth Control
That is a very different statment and says nothing concrete about the pill and abortion. There is no consensus on the issue. What we do know is that it is possible to get pregnant on the pill as many women do. Is there solid evidence that abortions occur and that they are caused by the pill?
aaplog.org/position-and-papers/oral-contraceptive-controversy/Included here are two papers, carefully researched and compiled by several members of the AAPLOG board (Birth Control Pill: Abortifacient and Contraceptive and Hormone Contraceptives Controversies and Clarifications). These papers come to different conclusions about the possible abortifacient effect of oral contraceptives, reflecting in a microcosm the controversy that has recently surrounded this issue in the larger pro-life community.
Aside from the moral issues of the use of contraception, the fact that there is some debate about whether the oral contraceptive pill can act abortifacient is surely another reason to err on the side of caution and not use it.
The oral contraceptive is not the only type of contraception of which there are different views among people about whether they can be abortifacient.
The Center for Bio-Ethical Reform says:
abortionno.org/birth-controlMany forms of birth control can be classified as abortifacients since they do not always prevent fertilization and in some instances work to destroy the life of a developing child.