MEDJUGORJE-RULES Sep-28-2009 …
Mostar bishop reiterates rules for Medjugorje parish
**MOSTAR, Bosnia-Herzegovina (CNS) – **Confirming young people from the parish in the Bosnian town of Medjugorje, Bishop Ratko Peric of Mostar-Duvno asked them not to behave as if the alleged Marian apparitions reported in the parish were real.
In late September, the bishop posted on his diocesan Web site an Italian translation of his homily from the June confirmation Mass, as well as letters to the Franciscan pastor of the Medjugorje parish and to another priest serving there.
Bishop Peric had told the young people that, during a visit to the Vatican early in the year, the top officials at the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith and the Vatican Secretariat of State confirmed they were telling anyone who asked that the Catholic Church has never recognized the alleged apparitions as authentic.
… "These are private messages
**to private people **
for private use," he said, ordering the Franciscan to cease commenting on or publicizing them in any way.
The Church is very deliberate and takes much time in such matters . . . deliberating diligently and quite deliberately . . . taking many things into consideration over time . . . and the happenings in Medujugorje are still under investigation by the Church . . . and a decision
either pro or con has not been forthcoming from the
Holy See . . . this has been the established pattern and position of the church for many years . . .
If you have watched EWTN . . . for years they have been very very careful . . . because the Church has yet to make a decision about the Medjugorje apparitions . . . to
not promote Medjugorje materials in their bookstore . . . while occassionally comments come up in programs about Medjugorje . . . their are neither supported nor denied by EWTN . . . who remain with Rome as essentially neutral . . . and will I am sure remain so until Rome speaks authoritatively on the subject . . . leaving decisions to believe or not to believe completely in the
“personal belief” category . . .
Regarding Lourdes and Fatima . . . the Holy See also took . . .
appropriately . . . years of contemplation . . . and excercised much
due diligence in deliberating and investigating these apparitions also . . . before the Church made any decision about these apparations . . . Medjugorjian apparitions have
neither been condemned
nor been authorized . . . they remain in the
“private revelation” . . . category at present . . . and are still in the . . .
“undecided” . . . category for the Catholic Church . . . because the **Holy See **authoritatively has not yet ruled and spoken on these matters . . . The church in Medjugorje is completely under the authority of the **Holy See **. . . and the Bishop’s request that it officially remain quiet until the **Holy See **makes a decision on the apparitions is completely appropriate . . .
The apparitions remain . . .
“private revelation” . . . and belief in same . . . until the
Holy See speaks regarding same . . . remains in the category of . . .
“private belief” . . .
*In dedication to the Triumph of the Immaculate Heart . . . *
. . . all for Jesus+
. . . completely subject to the Holy Father
and the Magesterium+
. . . Holy Mother Mary please pray for us+
. . . thank You Lord - thank you Holy Mother Mary+
. . . thank you Holy Mother Church
for your investigative due diligence
on God’s children’s behalf+