Mother of God

  • Thread starter Thread starter blessedrosary
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
40.png
willy:
Lord and Emmanuel are two different things , both of which Jesus is.
  1. He is our master thus in calling him Lord we are correct
  2. Emmanuel means Holy one , and he is indeed Holy ( if you dont believe i am accurate the Italian word/ name Emmanuela fm. translated means Holy one or Divine one , there is the latin word too but i forgot its spelling)
They’re synonymous.Like “Jacob and Israel”. Gn. 46.2, Rm. 11.26 and dozens of other verses throughout the Bible. What about “priest annd minister”? Ex 29.30, Nu 3.3 & 6, Deut 17.12, Joel 1.13 Heb 8.1, 2 Rom 15.16. By the way. Ask your protestant friends why we don’t need priests anymore, in light of these verses. What about “Church and Kingdom” Matt 16.18, 19. “Lord and God”? John 20.28 “Woman and Mother”? Gen.3 15,16 & 20, John 19. 26,27. Ouch! I guess that’s closer to the subject.
Nonetheless, I’ll repeat Luke 1.43 for the benefit of Daniel Marsh. “And why is this granted me, that the mother of my LORD(not master) should come to me?”. As an added bonus, I’ll throw in verse 48. “for He has regarded the low estate of His hand maiden. For behold, henceforth all generations will call me blessed”. You’ll notice that it dosen’t say, “all generations will call me sinner”.
 
I, not being a great theologian, only know one thing.

When I stand before Jesus, the LAST thing I want him to say to me is “Why didn’t you show my mother (and yours) the proper respect?”

I figure I have enough sins to answer for.
 
Marry is the daughter of the Father, the bride of the Holy Spirit and the mother of the Son. Hail Mary.
 
40.png
threadkiller:
They’re synonymous.Like “Jacob and Israel”. Gn. 46.2, Rm. 11.26 and dozens of other verses throughout the Bible. What about “priest annd minister”? Ex 29.30, Nu 3.3 & 6, Deut 17.12, Joel 1.13 Heb 8.1, 2 Rom 15.16. By the way. Ask your protestant friends why we don’t need priests anymore, in light of these verses. What about “Church and Kingdom” Matt 16.18, 19. “Lord and God”? John 20.28 “Woman and Mother”? Gen.3 15,16 & 20, John 19. 26,27. Ouch! I guess that’s closer to the subject.
Nonetheless, I’ll repeat Luke 1.43 for the benefit of Daniel Marsh. “And why is this granted me, that the mother of my LORD(not master) should come to me?”. As an added bonus, I’ll throw in verse 48. “for He has regarded the low estate of His hand maiden. For behold, henceforth all generations will call me blessed”. You’ll notice that it dosen’t say, “all generations will call me sinner”.
Im not protestant , im 100% Roman Catholic born n raised thank you. And ummm your verses that u just quoted or at least the second , when exactly did i say he was a sinner:confused:, lol i have no idea what your trying to prove against me. Lord and master are synonym’s . figure it out.
 
Incidentally, January 1st is the feast day for Mary, Mother of God! So thanks to Fidelis, from another thread, you need to read the following post on Mary, the Theotokos.

God Bless!

Notworthy
 
40.png
NotWorthy:
Incidentally, January 1st is the feast day for Mary, Mother of God! So thanks to Fidelis, from another thread, you need to read the following post on Mary, the Theotokos.

God Bless!

Notworthy
Apparently there is an error on the page you cited, it won’t post.
 
40.png
willy:
Im not protestant , im 100% Roman Catholic born n raised thank you. And ummm your verses that u just quoted or at least the second , when exactly did i say he was a sinner:confused:, lol i have no idea what your trying to prove against me. Lord and master are synonym’s . figure it out.
I know you’re 100% catholic. As I made clear in my post, I was quoting said verses for the edification of Daniel Marsh, who claims that Mary was a sinner.
I know that Lord and master can be synoymous, but in Luke 1.43
Elizabeth refers to Mary as “… mother of my LORD”, thus translated means “Mother of God”. Which is the subject of this thread. Sorry for offending you.
By the way. Did you happn to look up any of the other 18 verses that I cited. Especially concerning “priest and minister”.
I’d appreciate yor comments. That’s why I encouraged you to ask your protestant friends about the need for the priesthood in light of these verses. I have many good and godly protestant friends. That dosen’t make m any less catholic.
 
Daniel Marsh:
Hi Blessedrose, many protestants understand the catholic meaning to mean, the creator or origiin of God.
Well then they really aren’t paying attention to what Catholicism actually teaches.

Mary as Mother of God is no more the creator or originator of God than my mother created or originated me. God created me within my mother, and God conceived the Messiah within Mary. In both cases, though, the mother contributes to the human substance of the new person (in Mary’s case it was the entire contribution).

Partially in rejection of understanding Mary as the Mother of God, I still see Protestants making what are essentially heretical claims about the Incarnation. On another forum, for example, they are claiming that the Word was simply contained in a human body, or that the Word was carried in the man Jesus.
 
Daniel Marsh:
Evan

A = B
A != B

is not a mystry, it is a contradiction.
Did not simeon say ‘He would be a contradiction’ when Mary presented Him at the temple.

My daughter has two fathers and two mothers. Eight grandparents. No sisters and two sisters. She too is a contraditions but we still offer her all our love as parents. We believe she is a contradiction and a mystery.

No contradictions (logical inconsistencies) can exist, but contractions (verbal gymnastics) do exist. A contradition :rolleyes:

Physically, Jesus has a mother. Jesus is fully human.
Spiritually, Jesus has no mother, he is God, He is fully God.

When we speak of Mary she is the mother of Jesus, who has both natures. So being mother of one, she is mother of the other, she is mother of Jesus, both God and Man.

Once you unwind the verbal gymnastics and penetrate the mystery, the contradiction is resoved into a beautiful expression of truth.

My daughter has a family that fed and raised her, that nurtured her from birth until today, that gives her all she needs to live and flourish, physically and spiritually.

My daughter is adopted, she also has a birth family with a father mother, sisters, grandparent…etc. Although they exist and have not seen her for many years, and some have died. They are no less her family.

Two sisters, two brothers (physically)
no sisters or brothers (legally)
two sisters, no brothers (emotionally)

All true, and logically impossible.
 
Daniel Marsh:
Hi Brenda, pertty name, what are the origins of these titles for Mary, who was the first to use each of them? And, what was the original meaning of each vs what they mean today?

From the “Litany of the Blessed Virgin”

(Removed unnecessarily long quote as per forum rules.)

also, how does one respond to

Mary is Mother of God
Jesus is second person of Trinity
Therefore Mary is the Mother of the Trinity

👍
This is perverse…where does the Word state that Mary, an earthly vessel, chosen and MADE by God is mother of God??! This is man made doctrine. No man is without sin- read your bibles, he who states that they are without sin is a LIAR (1john). Only God is without sin- we have a high priest who is without sin (Hebrews)- he is the only one who can save you (throughout all of the bible!!), answer your prayers (throughout all of the bible!!)- be your refuge (throughout psalms). Basically, the majority of what’s been listed is the characteristics and nature of the only true living God- NOT MARY!! The very essences of Jehovah has been stripped bare and given unto Mary. This is the work of the enemy.

**All the glory goes to one!!! Isaiah 42:8
**

Never once did Jesus or his disciples pray unto Mary! I find it ludicrous that Mary has been exalted to a high place whereby people believe that she can save their souls and answer their prayers. But the Word does tells us that enemy will deceive many, and try to be like the most high- take on the characteristics and nature of God (isaiah 14/ 2 corin 11)… morning star! Putting your prayers to someone other than God is idolatry- you’ve put something before God…Read the bible.

We have an advocate, Mary is not our co-redeemer. There can only be one redeemer I John 2:1, Isaiah 49:26, Colossians 1:13-14, Romans 3:24.

Mary did not remain a virgin- read the bible, the Word tells us that she had other children and that Joseph couldn’t have relations with her until her concieved her first born…it even mentions Mary’s sons’ names! Matthew 1:24-25/ Mark 6:3/ John 2:17, Psalms 69:8-9/ John 7:5/ Galatians 1:19

The gross misreprensentaion of the scriptures is unreal.

For clarity, the Word tells us that anyone who does the will of God, believes in Jesus, follows his teachings- will be his brother, mother, or sister… Search it out for yourself! (mat 12/ mark 3).
Does this then mean that 2billion women are the mothers of God, queen of heaven? 'Cos the Word tells me that the queen of heaven is some pagan satanic idol of the old testament- Read it for yourself, it’s in the bible (Read Jeremiah)

“How say they that Christ is David’s Son? And David himslef saith in the book of Psalms, 'The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, Till i make thine enemies thy footstool. David therefore calleth him Lord, how is he then his son?” Luke 21

Worship in spirit and in truth

Love in Christ,

Your sis
 
jesus is lord,

Please review the following articles here at Catholic Answers for the official teachings on the items you mention above, regarding the Blessed Virgin Mary.

Mary and the Saints

Many of the items you mention here were discussed previously and furthermore, many of the things you say Catholics believe are not indicitive of Catholic teaching at all.

Peace,

Rachel
 
jesus is lord:
This is perverse…where does the Word state that Mary, an earthly vessel, chosen and MADE by God is mother of God??! This is man made doctrine. No man is without sin- read your bibles, he who states that they are without sin is a LIAR (1john). Only God is without sin- we have a high priest who is without sin (Hebrews)- he is the only one who can save you (throughout all of the bible!!), answer your prayers (throughout all of the bible!!)- be your refuge (throughout psalms). Basically, the majority of what’s been listed is the characteristics and nature of the only true living God- NOT MARY!! The very essences of Jehovah has been stripped bare and given unto Mary. This is the work of the enemy.

All the glory goes to one!!! Isaiah 42:8

Never once did Jesus or his disciples pray unto Mary! I find it ludicrous that Mary has been exalted to a high place whereby people believe that she can save their souls and answer their prayers. But the Word does tells us that enemy will deceive many, and try to be like the most high- take on the characteristics and nature of God (isaiah 14/ 2 corin 11)… morning star! Putting your prayers to someone other than God is idolatry- you’ve put something before God…Read the bible.

We have an advocate, Mary is not our co-redeemer. There can only be one redeemer I John 2:1, Isaiah 49:26, Colossians 1:13-14, Romans 3:24.

Mary did not remain a virgin- read the bible, the Word tells us that she had other children and that Joseph couldn’t have relations with her until her concieved her first born…it even mentions Mary’s sons’ names! Matthew 1:24-25/ Mark 6:3/ John 2:17, Psalms 69:8-9/ John 7:5/ Galatians 1:19

The gross misreprensentaion of the scriptures is unreal.

For clarity, the Word tells us that anyone who does the will of God, believes in Jesus, follows his teachings- will be his brother, mother, or sister… Search it out for yourself! (mat 12/ mark 3).
Does this then mean that 2billion women are the mothers of God, queen of heaven? 'Cos the Word tells me that the queen of heaven is some pagan satanic idol of the old testament- Read it for yourself, it’s in the bible (Read Jeremiah)

“How say they that Christ is David’s Son? And David himslef saith in the book of Psalms, 'The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand, Till i make thine enemies thy footstool. David therefore calleth him Lord, how is he then his son?” Luke 21

Worship in spirit and in truth

Love in Christ,

Your sis
Christ left a church to teach, govern and sanctify His name until the end of time… To reject that authority is to reject Christ and His Gospel.Catholics accept the bible as an authority in matters of faith because it is God’s inspired word. However, we cannot accept it as the only rule of faith for the following reason…
IT GOES AGAINST THE BIBLE
Christ left a Church with divine authority to govern in His Name Mt 16:13-20, 18:18
Christ promised us that this Church would last until the end of time MT 16:18,28:19-20; Jn 14:16
the Bible also tells us that Sacred tradition is to be followed along side Sacred Scripture 2 thes 2:15,3:6
Could you show me where the doctrine of Sola Scripture is found in Scripture?The Bible does confirm that not everything Jesus said and did is recorded in Scripture (John 21:25)
Shall I continue…???
 
I think I shall continue…

In Luke 1:26-56 In verse 48, Our Lady prophesis that ALL AGES will call her blessed. Why don’t non-catholics call her Blessed Virgin Mary. they call her Mary or perhaps Virgin Mary, but almost never Blessed Virgin Mary. Let me point out that Catholics are the ones being Biblical here!
Onward…
Mary’s perpetual virginity…
(1) show me where Jesus’ Brothers are called “Sons of Mary”(all Scriprute you quoted in previous post indicates names of brothers of Jesus NOT sons of Mary)
In Biblical times, as in our own, the word “brother” is used in many different ways. It can indicate sibling,relative,friend,or associate. In Acts fellow Christians are called brothers Acts21:7 as are Jewish leaders(Acts 22:1)
Mary Queen of Heaven… oh no your not going to quote Jeremiah 7:18 are you!!!

I shall be a defender of Mary!
 
Daniel Marsh:
Hi Blessedrose, many protestants understand the catholic meaning to mean, the creator or origiin of God.

They are correct that catholics ( maybe not all ) do raise mary up too high to the level that looks like false worship.

Mary being Jewish would rebuke the church for how they have raised her up too high.

No honest Jewish person, would be comfortable with how high you have raised up Mary.
The Church thinks of Mary just as her Son does we both love her.
Did Jesus not say to honor your father and MOTHER.
That is what the church and Jesus does.
 
Daniel Marsh:
Hi Blessedrose, many protestants understand the catholic meaning to mean, the creator or origiin of God.

They are correct that catholics ( maybe not all ) do raise mary up too high to the level that looks like false worship.

Mary being Jewish would rebuke the church for how they have raised her up too high.

No honest Jewish person, would be comfortable with how high you have raised up Mary.
The Church thinks of Mary just as her Son does we both love her.
Did Jesus not say to honor your father and MOTHER.
That is what the church and Jesus does.
 
40.png
maryj:
Mary’s perpetual virginity…
(1) show me where Jesus’ Brothers are called “Sons of Mary”(all Scriprute you quoted in previous post indicates names of brothers of Jesus NOT sons of Mary)
In Biblical times, as in our own, the word “brother” is used in many different ways. It can indicate sibling,relative,friend,or associate. In Acts fellow Christians are called brothers Acts21:7 as are Jewish leaders(Acts 22:1)
Mary Queen of Heaven… oh no your not going to quote Jeremiah 7:18 are you!!!

I shall be a defender of Mary!
Good evening!

I just want to reliterate what has been mentioned before: Mary did not remain a virgin- the Word tells us that she had other children and that Joseph couldn’t have relations with her until ser concieved her first born…Matthew 1:24-25/ Mark 6:3/ John 2:17, Psalms 69:8-9/ John 7:5/ Galatians 1:19

Before reading the scriptures ask the holy ghost to fill you and guide you, 'cos only then will you be lead in truth. The scriptures does not need defending- it defend us.- read over the end of ephesians about type of defence it’s compared to: shield, amour, preparation, helmet…breastplate. Now it makes sense when the word says the battle is not yours…

The scriptures i gave you were not only indicative of what was being mentioned- mary having children, but some were prophetic scriptures. But you will not see that if you are not open to the teachings of the holy spirit, who will open the eyes of your understanding- revealling not only the letter of the scriptures but the spirit of the scriptures.

Pls read the following:

The Bible gives us many ways whereby we can clearly identify the Messiah. One of these ways is called a “sign” and is specifically linked to his miraculous birth. In the Book of Isaiah we read:

Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign; Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel (Isa. 7:14, KJV).
Along with many other Scriptures, that passage clearly points us to the Lord Jesus, the Anointed One, who was born of a “virgin”. But even among those who agree that Mary was a virgin, at that point in time, there arises a controversy, that being: Did she stay a virgin after Jesus was born? Let’s go to the Scriptures to find the answer:

And Joseph, having risen from the sleep, did as the messenger of the Lord directed him, and received his wife, and did not KNOW her TILL she brought forth her son – the first-born, and he called his name Jesus (Matt. 1:24,25, Young’s Literal).
The Greek word translated “know” in that verse is ginosko. It is also used at Lk. 1:34, where it carries the same meaning:

And Mary said unto the messenger, “How shall this be, seeing a husband I do not know?” (Young’s Literal).
Mary couldn’t understand how she could possibly give birth without first coming to “know” her husband, that is, having sexual union. This is the meaning here and in Matt. 1:25 of ginosko. Such did not happen between Joseph and Mary “till” Jesus was born (Matt. 1:25).
Please note: Had the Holy Spirit wanted to convey the thought that Mary was a perpetual virgin her whole life through, He could have stopped Matt. 1:25 before the words: “TILL she brought forth her son.” Then the sentence would have taught Mary was a perpetual virgin by reading: “Joseph … did not know her” or as the NIV would have read: “But he had no union with her.” This, however, is NOT how the Biblical record reads! That verse states, by implication, that there was a point in time that Joseph and Mary had sexual union, that is, after Jesus was born. This is in perfect agreement with Isa. 7:14, and the other passages on this topic, yet to be cited in this article.

Let’s move on to a clear supportive text from Luke’s Gospel:

“And she gave birth to her FIRSTBORN, a son. She wrapped him in cloths and placed him in a manger, because there was no room for them in the inn” (Luke 2:7, NIV).
The word “firstborn” is used elsewhere for the oldest of the children. Many examples in Scripture could be cited to prove this. The following are but two:

Joseph named his firstborn Manasseh and said, “It is because God has made me forget all my trouble and all my father’s household.” The second son he named Ephraim and said, “It is because God has made me fruitful in the land of my suffering” (Gen. 41:51,52).
The sons of Josiah: Johanan the firstborn, Jehoiakim the second son, Zedekiah the third, Shallum the fourth (1 Chron. 3:15).
Jesus was not called Mary’s “only-born” but instead Mary’s “firstborn,” thereby suggesting Mary had other children, which is indeed the case.
www.evangelicaloutreach.org
 
1/2
A more clear indication of this occurred when Jesus, as a full grown man, came to his hometown (Nazareth) and began to teach. People from there, who apparently knew his family, stated the following in disbelief:

Coming to his hometown, he began teaching the people in their synagogue, and they were amazed. “Where did this man get this wisdom and these miraculous powers?” They asked. “Isn’t this the carpenter’s son? Isn’t his mother’s name Mary, and aren’t his brothers James, Joseph, Simon and Judas? Aren’t all his sisters with us? Where then did this man get all these things?” (Matt. 13:54-56).
According to that text, Mary had at least four other sons, besides Jesus, and at least two daughters. Some argue that the word “brothers,” found in this passage, merely means relatives such as cousins. If that is the true intended meaning, then one must wonder why the Greek word meaning “cousin” (anepsios) was not used there as it was in Col. 4:10:

My fellow prisoner Aristarchus sends you his greetings, as does Mark, the cousin of Barnabas. You have received instructions about him; if he comes to you, welcome him.
Again, in contrast to Col. 4:10, a different Greek word is used in Matt. 13:55 – adelphos. This Greek word translated “brothers” comes from the word, delphus, which means womb.
Furthermore, we should also focus our attention in upon the word “sisters” in Matt. 13:56. The Greek word for “sisters” is adelphe. It is also found in the following:

Do not rebuke an older man harshly, but exhort him as if he were your father. Treat younger men as brothers, older women as mothers, and younger women as sisters, with absolute purity (1 Tim 5:1,2).
As in Matt. 13:56, the usage of adelphe in 1 Tim. 5:2 means natural sister born as to the same mother. The context from verse 1 shows the meaning to be the natural family. This is how the same Greek word must be understood in Matt. 13:56, since spiritual sister can’t fit the context.
Mary had 7 or more children: Jesus the firstborn (or oldest) and at least 6 others, with at least 2 or more being daughters. But there is even more truth on this subject found in the Old Testament book of Psalms, where it is stated in the first person singular, as being spoken of by Jesus:
“My Own Mother’s Sons”
I am a stranger to my brothers, an alien to my own mother’s sons; for zeal for your house consumes me, and the insults of those who insult you fall on me (Psa. 69:8,9).
That is a Messianic Psalm, that is, it has application to Messiah Jesus. This is clear since this Psalm is quoted in the New Testament (Jn. 2:17) and shown there to apply to the Lord. The point is: Jesus became “an alien to MY OWN MOTHER’S SONS.” This alienation is clearly evident at John 7:3-5. Before we look at that passage, please note that Scripture explicitly declares that Jesus’ mother (Mary) had other “sons” (Psalm 69:8)! This verse alone is an irrefutable and devastating blow to the idea that the blessed Mary remained a virgin throughout her lifetime. Remember, Joseph had no sexual union with Mary “till” Jesus, Mary’s “firstborn,” came into this world.
 
2/2In Jn. 7:3-5, we read:

Jesus’ brothers said to him, “You ought to leave here and go to Judea, so that your disciples may see the miracles you do. No one who wants to become a public figure acts in secret. Since you are doing these things, show yourself to the world.” For even his own brothers did not believe in him.
This passage clearly shows the context cannot allow for an interpretation of spiritual “brother,” since the same “did not believe in him”! This disbelief in Jesus from his own “brothers,” at that point in time, is shown elsewhere:

Then Jesus entered a house, and again a crowd gathered, so that he and his disciples were not even able to eat. When his family heard about this, they went to take charge of him, for THEY SAID, “HE IS OUT OF HIS MIND.” . . . Then Jesus’ mother and brothers arrived. Standing outside, they sent someone in to call him. A crowd was sitting around him, and they told him, “Your mother and brothers are outside looking for you.” “Who are my mother and my brothers?” he asked. Then he looked at those seated in a circle around him and said, “Here are my mother and my brothers! Whoever does God’s will is my brother and sister and mother” (Mark 3:20,21,31-35).
Yes, you read Scripture right. Even Mary, and her other sons, at one point during Jesus’ ministry, thought Jesus was “out of his mind”! This, however, doesn’t mean that they didn’t afterwards come to believe on Jesus and get filled with the Holy Spirit, for they were in the Upper Room on the day of Pentecost with the other 120:

They all joined together constantly in prayer, along with the women and Mary the mother of Jesus, and with his brothers (Acts 1:14).
 
3/3
There is additional proof that Jesus’ half-brothers came to faith in him. This is shown in 1 Cor. 9:5:

Don’t we have the right to take a believing wife along with us, as do the other apostles and the Lord’s brothers and Cephas?
There we learn that the Lord’s half-brothers were married, as was Cephas (another name for Peter, Jn. 1:42). These husband-wife couples traveled together, as they served God.
Furthermore, regarding Jude and James, who were named in Matt. 13:55 as Jesus’ “brothers,” we read the following:

Jude, a servant of Jesus Christ and a brother of James. To those who have been called, who are loved by God the Father and kept by Jesus Christ (Jude 1).
Notice: The writer of the epistle of Jude was also “a brother (adelphos) to James,” but most importantly he was a servant of Jesus Christ. So he clearly came to his spiritual senses.
Furthermore, James, the Lord’s brother, is mentioned by Paul in Gal. 1:19:

I saw none of the other apostles – only James, the Lord’s brother (Gal. 1:19 NIV).
This is an important verse for two reasons: (1) It shows that James not only came to faith in Jesus, but became an apostle. (2) Besides becoming an apostle, he was also “the Lord’s brother.” The phrase “the Lord’s brother,” used here, can’t possibly be limited to mean his spiritual brother, since it is already understood that Jesus’ apostles are members of his spiritual family. James was both an apostle and half-brother of Jesus.
So according to Scripture, Mary did not remain a virgin after she gave birth to Jesus. This basic Biblical truth is in direct conflict with what millions of people have been taught, but nonetheless, it is God’s word on this subject not any man’s. The following is but one quote about Mary’s perpetual virginity from the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

“Mary ‘remained a virgin in conceiving her Son, a virgin in giving birth to him, a virgin in carrying him, a virgin in nursing him at her breast, always a virgin” (p. 128, bold emphasis mine).
Dear reader, that quote was from the Catholic theologian, Augustine (who also was the original source of modern-day Calvinism). The following is another important quote which shows how Roman Catholicism counters Matt. 13:55:

“Against this doctrine the objection is sometimes raised that the Bible mentions brothers and sisters of Jesus. The Church has always understood these passages as not referring to other children of the Virgin Mary. In fact James and Joseph, ‘brothers of Jesus,’ are the sons of another Mary, a disciple of Christ, whom St. Matthew significantly calls “the other Mary.” They are close relations of Jesus, according to an Old Testament expression” (Catechism of the Catholic Church, p. 126, bold emphasis mine).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top