D
DaveBj
Guest
Oh, I forgot to mention that the Russian in the film was well pronounced, literate when it had to be, colloquial when it had to be, and profane when it fitted.
DaveBj
DaveBj
Maybe not.This thread reminds me of the discussions on the harry Potter movies-some loved em, some hated em. The only difference is
.Code:at least no one tells me I am going to burn in hell for seeing the latest Indiana Jones movie
**
Finally saw this, the bride having received the DVD for Christmas. I got two words for it:
*]Stink-
*]-eroo
Sure, there were -]action/-] CGI sequences, but there was wa-ay too much talking in between them. It shoulda’ been called Indiana Jones and the Computer Generated Imagery.
Maybe not.
But I expect to get 122 minutes back off my time in Purgatory…
tee
It wasn’t that bad, at least to me. As a long time Indy fan, I was happy to see a new movie and Harrison Ford did very well for his age. There was plenty of action as far I’m concerned and most of the CGI was at the end, except for the ants and monkeys. But what’s so wrong with CGI?If it works for the story and it’s done well, it’s fine with me.
Of course, we’re all entitled to our opinions, I just wanted to represent the “pro” side of this discussion. It’s not unanimous that it’s a bad movie, there have been worse. There are plenty of us who love it, warts and all.
I think the intended audience for the movie was the core fans - it was more of a nostalgia piece than a story, really. It wrapped up the loose ends from the actual story, and gave it a happy ending, but that was about it.It wasn’t that bad, at least to me. As a long time Indy fan, I was happy to see a new movie and Harrison Ford did very well for his age. There was plenty of action as far I’m concerned and most of the CGI was at the end, except for the ants and monkeys. But what’s so wrong with CGI?If it works for the story and it’s done well, it’s fine with me.
Of course, we’re all entitled to our opinions, I just wanted to represent the “pro” side of this discussion. It’s not unanimous that it’s a bad movie, there have been worse. There are plenty of us who love it, warts and all.![]()
I’m with you! I liked the movie, too.It wasn’t that bad, at least to me. As a long time Indy fan, I was happy to see a new movie and Harrison Ford did very well for his age. There was plenty of action as far I’m concerned and most of the CGI was at the end, except for the ants and monkeys. But what’s so wrong with CGI?If it works for the story and it’s done well, it’s fine with me.
Of course, we’re all entitled to our opinions, I just wanted to represent the “pro” side of this discussion. It’s not unanimous that it’s a bad movie, there have been worse. There are plenty of us who love it, warts and all.![]()
Oh yeah…it’s hidden behind the back cover, paragraph 2866. You’ll need the “secret password”, which only faithful Catholics have knowledge of.No, you’re going to hell for this one. I’m pretty sure that it’s in the Cathechism.![]()
Of course it was an attempt to cash in on the name. It doesn’t mean it can’t also be a good movie.Couldn’t stand this movie, and it’s a shame b/c Raiders is one of my favorite movies. This movie was an attempt to cash in on the name just like the Star Wars prequels.