Neither communism nor theocracy implies the impossibility of independent personal religious practice.
My answer might change if religious freedom and respect for life were hallmarks of the brand of communism or theocracy that you propose. If we are describing the merits of a collective society or a rigidly hierarchical society versus a democracy, it would still depend. If the majority of citizens believe in cannibalism to solve the war on poverty, and had strong laws against abortion, fornication & adultery (because young teenagers are so tasty), I wouldn’t hold dearly to my fondness to the democratic way of life (although, I’m told they taste just like chicken).
Besides, this side excursion does nothing to advance the discussion of whether fornication & adultery laws are good or bad law, or whether biological father accountability as a “dead beat” dad, bringing the concept of child support to the pre-born, is good or bad law, etc.
My mention of Muslim society was not commentary of their society as a whole, but a focus on family stability with strong fornication & adultery laws in place.
Wm Penn, who’s life was devoted to the cause of religious freedom, would say that lack of law will not hurt a moral people, and comprehensive law will not deter an immoral people (an apology for his Frame of Government). However, certain laws against humanity left unchecked are only resolved by bloody war — eg, slavery, holocaust.
OK, ELIZA, the one-liner pop psychology program. Your turn. What you got in your magic eight ball repertoire?