Plato:
So, what do you think of a Christian writer who was a former Muslim? Wouldn’t you think this kind of author is worth reading?
Most that I’ve read are just as misinformed about their former faith as Christian writers would be about Islam, so their claim to authority from having been Muslim actually rings pretty hollow.
I’m sure some Muslims may not appreciate what he has to say on some things about Islam.
Most of the things he writes just aren’t true…or at least are distorted.
The thing about the jizyah that the guy said to him that made him think was actually pretty dumb…and he was pretty stupid not to be able to find a refutation for it. For one the jizyah applies only to an Islamic state for dealing with its citizens, not normative person-to-person relationships.
Another example is the claim he makes about contradiction between Surah 47:15 and Surah 5:90. Now that’s really just moronic and infantile. Wine is forbidden, yes, but the heavenly “wine” that people are allowed to drink in Paradise (47:15) is non-intoxicating and pure…the Qur’an says in other parts.
I could go on, but what’s the point? I’ve even read bigger authors like the Caner brothers, who wrote “Unveiling Islam”, and who claim to be “former Muslims” who “discovered Christ”. Perhaps they were Muslims by sticky label only, but their book makes it clear they did not have even beyond elementary-level knowledge of Islam.
This is the way of such authors…most of them are incompetent, complete dimwits.
Someone else suggested Robert Spencer…he’s certainly a good choice…you should read him if you would read a book by Satan to learn about God.