C
CatholicZ09
Guest
Do you guys have plans for the Feast of the Presentation of the Lord, which falls on a Sunday this year?
The Mass of Renewal is being used a lot, but I really don’t care for it at all.I’m thinking I may have to follow that same rule for a while at least. This parish is about 6x larger than my previous parish, so I don’t have quite the freedom I used to.
As it is, the first ‘new music’ I introduced was the Mass of Renewal (part of five settings the Diocese wants everyone to learn). There was kicking and screaming from a few, which I expected. The only pro/con response I received (outside of my choir) was “it’s good that we are learning new music so we aren’t singing the same songs all the time, but I absolutely HATE this Mass setting. No one is singing it” (at the last Music/Worship meeting before Christmas).
Which brings up a question. What settings are you all using now that we are two years into the new translation?
WHich renewal are you talking about?The Mass of Renewal is being used a lot, but I really don’t care for it at all.
I prefer the Mass of St. Anne by Ed Bolduc or the Glendalough Mass by Liam Lawton.
My personal opinion is that Masses with a lot of repetition get really old really fast, and tend to sound a bit hokey. Just my opinions though, many like the repetition. I purposely stayed away from reworked settings. It’s confusing and hard for non-musicians to re-learn things they’ve sung for years. They’ll just be frustrated. I started NEW with everything. No looking back.![]()
When the whole thing came out, I initially started new, using Haugen’s “Storrington Mass” It has a nice (6/8 time) bouncy feel to it. And that congregation loved it. Here, they had been using Christ the Savior since the beginning of the translation. Apparently the previous director thought it was the only singable one out there.The Mass of Renewal is being used a lot, but I really don’t care for it at all.
I prefer the Mass of St. Anne by Ed Bolduc or the Glendalough Mass by Liam Lawton.
My personal opinion is that Masses with a lot of repetition get really old really fast, and tend to sound a bit hokey. Just my opinions though, many like the repetition. I purposely stayed away from reworked settings. It’s confusing and hard for non-musicians to re-learn things they’ve sung for years. They’ll just be frustrated. I started NEW with everything. No looking back.![]()
Actually, I think since most of the people on this thread are musicians, they probably can hear past the guitar, but maybe I’m being too optimistic?A local friend wrote a setting which I think far surpasses any others that I’ve heard in ease of learning, ease of singing, and catchy. My parish sings this one the loudest.
I imagine most people here can’t hear past the guitar. I’ll tell you what… the other music director of Adam’s parish wrote 4 part choir parts to it, and plays it on organ, and magically transformed the mass into a very traditional sound.
adambitter.com/chord-charts-lyrics/mass-parts/
Heritage is very easy to learn. The parish loves it.I’m not a fan of the revised Mass of Creation. I too was hoping it would fail. However, that is part of the list of five settings…
Trying to decide what setting to teach next in the fall (Mass of Redemption, MoC, Heritage are left). This congregation isn’t the most receptive, so I’m at a loss as to which to do next.
As for Presentation of the Lord, not quite sure yet. I usually plan the Mass the week before. As I matter of fact, I was going to ask the same question. I’m looking for a few ideas.
Yes, I would agree with this. Every parish I work and freelance in that does this mass seems to be very successful with it. They also tend to really like it when it is done with the choir where the Latin parts are used. You sort of get the best of both worlds with the vernacular and the Latin. I do think The Heritage Mass has simple and lovely melodies, and the congregations had an easy time relearning everything.Heritage is very easy to learn. The parish loves it.
The Renewal is the Curtis Stephen one, sorry I forgot to lis the composer.WHich renewal are you talking about?
Kaufmann Renewal is the one that won the NPM award, and I find of the published ones that were out at the time of the changeover, that it was the catchiest and easiest to learn. My parish proved me right. I think it was the most solid one out there.
Mass of St. Ann has some similar melody lines and feel as “My heart will go on” from the titanic.
Catchy doesn’t mean “up”.The Renewal is the Curtis Stephen one, sorry I forgot to lis the composer.
Don’t really care for it.
As for some of the other comments, I the only thing I really don’t like about the MofC is the Lamb of God. I know lots of people like it, but it’s just painful for me. The melody is very tortured, but that’s just me. I see that many here love it. I don’t mind the MofC Gloria. The Kyrie is really the best thing about that Mass setting.
Myself, I try to stay away form the catchy tunes and Lamb of God settings that are way too “up” for that part of the liturgy. But again, that’s just my opinion. I understand that each parish has its own taste.
Peace,
pianist
I’m not a fan of the Lamb of God, either, from the MofC. I have always found with every congregation I’ve been in either as a cantor, choir member or just as a congregant that many people have a difficult time vocally negotiating the intervals, especially in “you take away the sins of the world”. Many people crack, pop or drop out in that part. Once I mastered my instrument after years of training was I able to sing it consistently well, myself.As for some of the other comments, I the only thing I really don’t like about the MofC is the Lamb of God. I know lots of people like it, but it’s just painful for me. The melody is very tortured, but that’s just me. I see that many here love it. I don’t mind the MofC Gloria. The Kyrie is really the best thing about that Mass setting.
Sorry, in my book “catchy” means repetitive and jingle like. I’ve never heard the word catchy used as simple to learn. Just my opinion. It’s also been my experience that music well done is what makes the person in the pew receptive. People memorize lots of convoluted songs from the radio. Repetition is what makes things easy to learn.Catchy doesn’t mean “up”.
Catchy means easy to learn, or something that stays in your head…because you “Catch” it.
No, repetition does not equal " easy to learn"Sorry, in my book “catchy” means repetitive and jingle like. I’ve never heard the word catchy used as simple to learn. Just my opinion. It’s also been my experience that music well done is what makes the person in the pew receptive. People memorize lots of convoluted songs from the radio. Repetition is what makes things easy to learn.
But that’s cool if you like it. No worries.
Ok you win.No, repetition does not equal " easy to learn"
“Easy to learn” means its actually, by objective nature of the music and the way the text is put to that music easy to learn.
Catchy means it catches on quickly.
Before the switch, I used Mass of Creation seasonally (Lent and Advent). Gloria problem solved.The problem with the revisions is cramming all that extra text into what was already written. In my previous parish, I used everything from MoC EXCEPT the Gloria. I REFUSE to use it.
That was a great idea.Before the switch, I used Mass of Creation seasonally (Lent and Advent). Gloria problem solved.
Me too!Just found this thread and LOVE the idea!
Here’s what we sang today:
Entrance: Alleluia! Sing to Jesus!
Offertory: What Wondrous Love Is This?
Communion 1: Veni, Jesu, Amor Mi
Communion 2: Come Down, O Love Divine
Communion 3: O God of Loveliness
Closing: Crown Him With Many Crowns
Mass parts: (these are mostly determined by pastor so they are the same at each mass, except we do more Latin at the 11am mass) Latin chant for Sanctus and Agnus Dei; Mass of Christ the Savior for Mem. Acc. and Great Amen; Gloria from Heritage Mass.