V
VociMike
Guest
Notice how Catholics aren’t arguing with each other, flooding the blogs, etc over the music at the papal Vespers service? A true study in contrast.
Because 95% of the people who tune into blogs and message boards probably count themselves as ‘traditionalists’Notice how Catholics aren’t arguing with each other, flooding the blogs, etc over the music at the papal Vespers service? A true study in contrast.
Really? I have held this view for 40 years as did my parents, aunts, uncles and neighbors who went to earlier and earlier Masses to avoid the music and who voted with their feet to move to parishes where they don’t have to listen to the type of music which does indeed divide. Everything is not “I’m OK; you’re OK - just focus on the Eucharist”. I would rather have no music than to be subjected to the kind of sacro-salsa and sacro-pop I heard yesterday.The same 15 people are making the same statements over and over in all corners of the internet…that’s not being divided…that’s 15 people with a narrow dogmatic view of music.
I tend to agree. There is no one I know,outside of web blogs, that express these types of opinions concerning music, going back to the TLM or revieving the Eucharist by hand or any of a number of other complaints I have read here. The mission of the church, and the message of this Pope goes far beyond these concerns.The same 15 people are making the same statements over and over in all corners of the internet…that’s not being divided…that’s 15 people with a narrow dogmatic view of music.
Twenty-five years of service as a cathedral chorister. Three hours of practice a week. I do indeed put my money where my mouth is and in those twenty-five years I have been exposed to a very, very wide variety of liturgical music. I think I have some idea of whereof I speak.if you are not willing to volunteer your services, practice for weeks at inconvenient times and stand in the blazing hot sun for hours to sing for the Pope I really don’t think you have anything to criticize. I think the music for all the events, including and especially the Mass in Washington, has been exceptional, delightfully varied, and presented liturgy richly for those participating and for those viewing who may be new to it, and richly appropriate for an American Church whose hallmark is diversity. The vespers was indeed lovely.
Indeed. And it is within the reach of the average parish choir.Must go now and work on an arrangement for a Taize chant we haven’t done before. That’s one type of music which does seem to please *almost *everyone *almost *all of the time.
Which was pretty much nothing more than a performance…which most would say doesn’t have much place in the context of the Eucharist.All the people there seemed to agree and approve of one song.
Placido Domingo’s Panis Angelicus.
There’s a song that doesn’t divide.
So, do you think Thomas Aquinas would agree with you…just a performance?Which was pretty much nothing more than a performance…which most would say doesn’t have much place in the context of the Eucharist.
sometimes i think that would be an improvement over the status quo.I hope we don’t get to a position when music is acceptable only when everyone approves of it. We’d have no music.
Probably, but I saw it as a performance. WHy did they need a first class opera star sing it. Why not a regular cantor or the choir. It’'s the same thing when they have big stars singing the National Anthem at ball games. The focus is not on the words but on the one singing it.All the people there seemed to agree and approve of one song.
Placido Domingo’s Panis Angelicus.
There’s a song that doesn’t divide.
Panis Angelicus was written for soloist and choir. In fact the choir backed Domingo. Why have Kathleen Battle sing the Lord’s Prayer…why not the principal cantor of the Shrine of the Immaculate Conception? To honor the Holy Father. No one knew that Pacido Domingo was going to do it…It came as a total welcomed surpise to me and to the HF. His eyes lit up. Domingo was not there to perform, he was there to use his voice in praise of the Eucharist.Probably, but I saw it as a performance. WHy did they need a first class opera star sing it. Why not a regular cantor or the choir. It’'s the same thing when they have big stars singing the National Anthem at ball games. The focus is not on the words but on the one singing it.
So true.Because 95% of the people who tune into blogs and message boards probably count themselves as ‘traditionalists’
Not to mention…the numbers who watched the vesper service paled in comparison to the numbers who watched the mass.
The music at the mass ‘divides’ us because folks like you are saying it ‘divides’ us.
The same 15 people are making the same statements over and over in all corners of the internet…that’s not being divided…that’s 15 people with a narrow dogmatic view of music.
Really? I have held this view for 40 years as did my parents, aunts, uncles and neighbors who went to earlier and earlier Masses to avoid the music and who voted with their feet to move to parishes where they don’t have to listen to the type of music which does indeed divide. Everything is not “I’m OK; you’re OK - just focus on the Eucharist”. I would rather have no music than to be subjected to the kind of sacro-salsa and sacro-pop I heard yesterday.
My point is that it was put out there as a communion meditation of sorts…which the rubrics don’t provide for. The positioning of the song made it more performance based. It’s a lovely poem set to music…it was just borderline placement of the piece…would’ve been more suitable for offertory or as a prelude.So, do you think Thomas Aquinas would agree with you…just a performance?
Well I think that often could be one option.sometimes i think that [silence] would be an improvement over the status quo.
I’m pretty far from a traditionalist. I don’t mind trumpets, guitars, or even drums as I’ve seen them done well. I don’t mind modern music. I don’t mind the novus ordo. I don’t like Latin. I came to defend the music from what I perceived to be an outcry over the entire thing not being in Gregorian chant. Then I watched the Mass.you’ve held the view for 40 yrs so that makes the poster wrong? lol, how funny. And please tell me who thinks “I’m ok your Ok”? You keep repeating this. It’s obviously directed at certain posters which I find somewhat insulting. Please explain this sentiment that you are accusing people of. I’m frankly sick of “we are not all happy clappy, we are not all I’m ok your ok, we are not all kumbaya” What the heck?? So, if anyone has a different view it means we just throw caution to the wind and not care? What gives you the right to assume to know what is in the hearts and minds of the faithful!