you are here not even one week & you know that she ’ always’ changes the subject ? huh .
You are right that I might be rude but I didn’t attend to be rude. As he explained why then I could understand. Have you read all posts before you posted it?
Most probably not.
but women today in some muslim countries still have no rights. they can’t have education, can’t drive cars, can’t vote, can’t leave the house w/o chaperon, can’t have their own business unlike their counterpart in non-muslim countries who in all honesty you can say have equal rights even w/ men. my point is even if you give “1/2 to the ladies” what good does it do if these ladies are left “naked” on many important issues?
** Emarc, you are right in some way. The present situation is like that. But it has not always been like that.but women today in some muslim countries still have no rights. they can’t have education, can’t drive cars, can’t vote, can’t leave the house w/o chaperon, can’t have their own business unlike their counterpart in non-muslim countries who in all honesty you can say have equal rights even w/ men. my point is even if you give “1/2 to the ladies” what good does it do if these ladies are left “naked” on many important issues?
God bless.
THIS STATEMENT IS FALSE!
Sister Amy:
The above statement was quoted by Sister Amy in replying to my query about whether rape requires the four witnesses or not. She was so dead certain that no such requirement is necessary that she even asked me to let her know if ever there is anyone who disputes it.
Jewish & Christians holy book also allowed that . So , what’s your point here ?
Holy Quran says to bring 4 witnesses if anyone brings any charge against any woman.
In other words, it is true that in Islam, religion and politic are one.
You mean you would really stone a person to death without any witnesses to confirm the crime?
your use of the word “ignore” is inappropriate. that one conduct of giving “1/2 inheritance to woman” may not specifically be written but clearly implied, and so with many other equal rights women must have with men (that men in the muslim world do not follow) when in Gen 2:18 the Lord God said, “It is not good for the man to be alone, I will make a suitable PARTNER for him.” marriage in Christianity is a partnership; men loving their wives just as Jesus loves his Church, which encompasses what you proudly claim. this is the teaching in Christianity even for husband to die for his wife just as Jesus died for us.
This is a non sequitur. Just because something is not addressed doesn’t mean all rights are ignored.
This is also a non sequitur. It does not follow that Western secular law is the way it is because secular people learned anything from Islam. When equality before the law was legislated [14th Amendment], it was at a time when the majority of the people were very religious and influenced by Christian thought, namely all are created in the image and likeness of God, are equally loved by God, and therefore should be treated equally before the secular laws. This is the Golden Rule mentioned earlier. Islam is the only ideology that claims to be a religion that does not have an equivalent to the Golden Rule. Where does Islamic foundational texts say that Allah loves believers and non-believers alike and all are made in his image and likeness? Mohammad never treated believers and non-believers the same. That’s where dhimmihood comes from.
Yep. Quran never mentioned about Bomb and yet the Islamic terrorist did use bomb. Quran never mentioned hash-hish (a kind of narcotic well known in Aceh) and yet the Acehnese freedom movement (Islamic based) cultivate hash-hish to finance their movements.