Whoe - can you please use “black” font - the color you chose is hard to read for us “old timers”…Moses was not a magician,
indeed, he was affected by their magic
His miracle was from god while the magic is from devil !
Thank you for your answer, although I have a few questions - not to jump subjects, but to clarify your answer so I can better understand your position.
no , i saying that one is from God and one alleged to be from God while it’s not
quran gave me this standard which i can use with any book be said from God
Ah, thank you, I was a bit worried there.
And what standard do you use for that claim? I think you answered that with the first part of this section: the Quran (S. 4:8). Otherwise, there is no spiritual standard for truth for a Muslim to follow. Am I correct, then, that the Quran would be your standard against someone claiming to have come from a religion in line with Islam? Just to make sure.
no
All right, elwill, you’re doing it again, you’re jumping subjects back to Christianity. But the modes you’re using can be used by anyone - atheist, agnostic, pagan, etc. But you are none of these. You are Muslim. Therefore, you have to admit that you’re rule of faith is the Quran, and I would expect it to be your standard of truth especially when you are dealing with people who are claiming to be of your same faith.
no , i can’t deny
Ah, thank you.
it will depends on long discussion about his claim that quran was corrupted , if he convinced me i will follow himAh, thank you.
Now, just to extend it a bit, let’s go back to my scenario. Let’s say you go to the guy who is claiming to be in line with Mohammad and the Quran. Let’s say you confront him about the discrepancies between what the Quran says and what his holy book says. He replies, “No, see, your prophet never wrote any of that,” or even, “No, the companions of the prophets changed the Quran,” or even, “No, later generations of Muslims corrupted the Quran.”** Would you follow his religion and take him at his word, or would you still hold the Quran as the infallible source of truth and try to argue that the contradictions of a later revelation are unique only to that supposed revelation**?
But the basis of his faith is that we should assume the Quran was corrupted because his religion tells him so, and part of his evidence is the contradictions between his own holy book and yours. How would you respond to that?
assuming that the quran was corrupted because his relegion tells him so without any other factual verifications will be called blind faith .
Very true, but it won’t be the only part of his argument, simply the inspiration for it. He will surely go beyond that belief to seek out any evidence the Quran is corrupt. He’ll quote liberal Muslim scholars to you, he’ll quote non-Muslim scholars who deny the divine authority of the Quran, he’ll quote to you supposed contradictions, he’ll go to early Muslim heresies, and many more to try to convince you that HIS revelation is the more accurate one. All this even if the sources he are using do not agree lead to the conclusion he is trying to make you come to.