- Jesus was a prophet. (Qur’an) (Bible)
- Only Jesus and Mary were not touched by Satan at their birth. (Qur’an)
- Muhammad was touched by Satan at his birth. (Qur’an - by inference)
4. Jesus said that all who come after Him are false prophets. (Bible) (emphasis mine)
- Muhammad followed Jesus and is believed to be a prophet. (Qur’an)
- Christianity rejects all prophets subsequent to Jesus. (Bible)
- Islam accepts both Jesus and Muhammad. (Qur’an)
- Either Jesus or Muhammad is lying.
Why would God (Allah) send a lying prophet?
Because He sent only one of them.
According to the Bible, Jesus Christ (pbuh) warns of
false prophets to come, NOT that there would be
no new prophet to come after him.
And how to distinguish between the false and the true prophets of God who may come after Jesus Christ (pbuh)?
Matthew 7
15 “Beware of false prophets, who come to you in sheep’s clothing, but inwardly they are ravenous wolves.
16 You will know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes from thornbushes or figs from thistles?
17 Even so, every good tree bears good fruit, but a bad tree bears bad fruit.
18 A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit.
19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
20 Therefore by their fruits you will know them.
First off, how is it possible that a man who calls for ‘
jihad’ and then leads his followers into numerous battles, should then be considered to be someone who is in
“sheep’s clothing”??
If anything, Matthew 7:15 simply cannot logically be talking about the Prophet Muhammad (pbuh), can it now?
And since Jesus (pbuh) says in the Bible that new prophets should be judged by the
“fruits” that they bring, then why isn’t Prophet Muhammad (pbuh) being judged by the
“fruits” that he brought, which are really not much different than the
“fruits” that are found in the Old Testament and also, like I have pointed out in the other
thread, the actual teachings of Jesus Christ (pbuh) himself as written in the New Testament?
The only way to have a meaningful discussion about these
“fruits” is to examine them objectively… and saying that the Old Testament laws were imperfect without providing any Biblical evidence whatsoever that they were imperfect, is really not a good way at all of having an objective examination of these laws.