The heroism in resisting sin to the point of death (St. Maria Goretti) or in giving oneself to death in the place of another (St. Maximilian Kolbe) is self-evident. The “not required” comes from the absence of a requirement, either in Sacred Scripture or in Catholic teaching (the Catechism).
I’ve never heard of evangelizing with the hope of attaining the “not required”. That seems completely foreign to Christianity, and is an invitation to mediocrity, lukewarmness, and presumption. The imperatives of the Christian life take their power from love, not from minimalist legal standards like “not required”.
Consider:
God was not required to create us, it is a gratuitous act of love.
God was not required to die for us while we were still sinners, his death is a gratuitous act of love.
God is not required to keep us in existence, it is his gratuitous love that keeps us from being less than nothing.
Using your standard of Christian fulfillment, none of us would even exist, because are none of us are required for God to be God.
Only God is sufficient unto himself with no requirements.
God needs nothing, including you. Given that God has no requirements, does he do only what is required of him? hardly…
There is an infinite gap God and his creatures that we cannot bridge. If you do not build that bridge to others because it is “not required” of us, you will burn your own bridge. Your own standard is the one God will use for you. That is not a pretty thought.
So let’s ask the thread question again,
“Must we forgive the unrepentant?”
cont’d