"I think the topic got off because of that very ignorant staement by Marietta about home schooled children being isolated all day with mom and dad and how awful that would be."
Ah, here’s that renowned Catholic charity in action - good work, kamz!!
I know homeschoolers, I have known several homeschoolers since the early 80s. Their children have for the most part grown into bright, productive, well-adjusted adults with very broad individual views of the world and their places in it.
My remark with regard to the inadvisability of home-schooling an only child came from a home-schooler himself, a graduate of Columbia University who, along with his college-enrolled wife, schooled all three of their children. He knew my daughter, who is asocial, withdrawn and fearful. It was his suggestion to enroll her in school to encourage her to be around kids her own age, to gauge what kids that age are interested in and try to become involved in friendships and social activities to which she would not have been exposed had she stayed home all day and night with only her mother as teacher, nurturer, friend, ally. That would have been unhealthy for both of us. This child’s father had been out of her life since she was 15 months old. There was absolutely no way that I could have shouldered her schooling on top of being mother and father; I was quite busy just trying to stay sober one day at a time.
fellowChristian writes:
*"Yes it’s so much better to have them be educated by their peers about money,sex, and religion. I’m sure their peers would do a much better job raising our children.
Lets not count the time spent with parents as socializing"*
Now, the public schooling experience may or may not include instruction regarding money and sex; I wish I had received some courses on handling money, investing, budgeting, but I did not in 12 years of public schooling. I did receive scant and edited information regarding reproduction, which was virtually useless to me in any practical sense.
It is not the job of the public schools or its students to educate children about religion. I believe that’s the job of the parents and the churches with which they are affiliated.
There is no way you are going to stem the tide of children and adolescents gathering information about money, sex or religion from their peers, whether they’re homeschooled or enrolled in public or parochial school. Peers, for better or worse, trust each other more than they trust parents, teachers or counselors. Your children will not be protected from the big, bad boogeyman triple threat of money, sex and religion as discussed by 12-year-olds or 18-year-olds. You can try, of course. But you will fail.
If socialization is the act of providing opportunities for our children to adapt to, or conform to, the common needs of a social group, how does their spending 24 hours a day 7 days a week with Mommy and Daddy support that goal?
Back to the topic: a 13-year-old who has the courage to stand toe-to-toe with her parents and announce that she is thinking about religion and spirituality is doing exactly what she is supposed to do. She is striving for autonomy. She may come back around to the Catholic way of life and she may not. The harder a parent pushes for adherence to one religion, the more determined the child will become to adopt a different view. Lead by example. If she wants to embrace Buddhism, leave her at home to do a report on Buddhism while you go to mass and then discuss it when you return. Be open to discussion. Each one of you may learn something that way. It beats polar opposition.
marietta