This is bizarre. Actually, the first thing it makes me think of, is what I encountered when I moved to the Washington, DC area a short time after I graduated from college. It is very common there — or at least it was 30+ years ago — not to know people’s last names. People don’t use them in introducing themselves. You can go a long time without knowing the last names of your neighbors. In my case, it may have been a case of “country come to town” — I grew up in a small town where everyone pretty much knew everyone else, and your last name, your “people”, were everything. Not so much in a major metropolitan area where everyone is transient and nobody knows, or cares, who you are.
The only way the “no last name” policy even remotely makes sense is because of the prevalence of social media, the ability to find people online, and to amass a huge amount of personal information when all you have is someone’s full name, or if it’s unusual enough and the town is small enough, just their first name. If someone’s name is, let’s say, “Januarius” and they live in Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania, they’re not going to be hard to track down — there would only be one. I rarely use my first name in filling out forms online, or any time I can avoid it, for privacy reasons, and my last name is a very common one. People are so obsessed with posting their selfies on Facebook and a hundred other social media programs, and putting their resume out there so they can get a better job, that they don’t stop and realize how easy they are making it for the wrong person to find them, where they live, where they work, what they and their family members look like, and so on. And I very much dislike the idea of having to post one’s picture and name on an employer’s website — not sure if I’d want to work somewhere that requires that.
So looking at it that way, I can kind of understand the daycare’s reasoning — but daycare, by its nature, is not the kind of place where they need to be concealing caregivers’ identities.
The only way the “no last name” policy even remotely makes sense is because of the prevalence of social media, the ability to find people online, and to amass a huge amount of personal information when all you have is someone’s full name, or if it’s unusual enough and the town is small enough, just their first name. If someone’s name is, let’s say, “Januarius” and they live in Slippery Rock, Pennsylvania, they’re not going to be hard to track down — there would only be one. I rarely use my first name in filling out forms online, or any time I can avoid it, for privacy reasons, and my last name is a very common one. People are so obsessed with posting their selfies on Facebook and a hundred other social media programs, and putting their resume out there so they can get a better job, that they don’t stop and realize how easy they are making it for the wrong person to find them, where they live, where they work, what they and their family members look like, and so on. And I very much dislike the idea of having to post one’s picture and name on an employer’s website — not sure if I’d want to work somewhere that requires that.
So looking at it that way, I can kind of understand the daycare’s reasoning — but daycare, by its nature, is not the kind of place where they need to be concealing caregivers’ identities.