B
Benedictus
Guest
Yes, I’ve seen that link before. It didn’t seem to have any points that I hadn’t heard before.Benedictus, did you look at this link? I really think it may help!
Yes, I’ve seen that link before. It didn’t seem to have any points that I hadn’t heard before.Benedictus, did you look at this link? I really think it may help!
If you think God is evil for this, then I’m sorry to say Satan has a fair hold on your mind. He WILL use this to turn you from God. I also think you’re forgetting that children imitate their parents. There’s no hope for those children, for its difficult to stop doing what you’ve learned to do from childhood. So it was a mercy that God commanded them to be killed. They might’ve spent their whole lives struggling and being bitter in their difficulty with learning a new concept of what’s moral.Firstly, he commands killing children in verse 6, which I regard as unjustifiably evil. Secondly, I still have trouble thinking of the slaughter of people for abandoning a religion as anything less than evil. What did the children do to deserve being killed? I’m sorry, but again, I see the killing of children as evil.
Then I guess you need to talk to Sisera’s mother about why she figured her son would be treating women as spoils of war. Sisera was not Jewish; he was Pagan, as far as I can tell. He’d have no qualms about doing this, and his mother obviously had no qualms with thinking it.Treating women as spoils of war seems like a type of rape to me.
You cannot argue with God’s plans. Why he let those nations invade Jerusalem and do those awful things, is something we should ask God when we get to Heaven. For now, all we can do is thank God for helping the Israelites fight the invaders and put an end to the violence and rape. To blame God for what sins people do is VERY silly.I guess when I read about God gathering nations to fight against Jerusalem in order to take the city, plunder houses, and ravish women that God was approving of or assisting the foreigners.
So you are saying that a 2 year old, a 6 year old, an 11 year old, who grow up in a bad home have no chance of ever negating what they’ve observed from their parents in their early years? Are you in fact saying that the next 50+ years of their life are irrelevant because the “damage has already been done”, and that nothing, not even placement of these children with Catholic families, would have changed that?There’s no hope for those children, for its difficult to stop doing what you’ve learned to do from childhood. So it was a mercy that God commanded them to be killed. They might’ve spent their whole lives struggling and being bitter in their difficulty with learning a new concept of what’s moral.
Faith and intellect are two different things. Jesus said unless we are like little children, we cannot enter the Kingdom. Faith does not require high education. A simple mind can accept God easier than a complicated one.Lastly, I’m a Catholic theology graduate. I went to Catholic university when I was eighteen because I wanted to make sense of life and understand my Catholicism more. I studied with some of the best Catholic minds in the world today. So, if I’m struggling as much as I am with these questions, what hope is there for the billions of simpler less educated people out there who are trying to think through these issues objectively? Isn’t God setting them an impossible task?
Looking at creation is a good place to start if you want to discover God. Wonder is the basis of worship.One can see God every where, there is no way to deny this fact.
When I look at the galaxy, the beautiful mountains and magnificent oceans, the numerous kind of trees, flowers, and animals, the complicated and amazing human body and soul, or even a flower pedal, I see the Wisdom, I know there is a Creator, the God.
I’m not the OP but I’m not sure what you meant by your last question. Just this week I was talking with a woman (Protestant) who was saying that her 40+ year old son doesn’t go to church nor has he or his wife brought their kids up in church. She was very sad about it and said something about how once he went to college, that was it for him. She thinks there’s something about having a college education that ruins people’s faith. Do you feel the same way?Oh my, what a distressing post! I don’t want to derail the OP topic, but I would love to hear more about how this happened to you. Was it gradual? Did you read or hear something that drew you away from your faith? Was there some type of “higher education” involved?![]()
I wouldn’t suggest this is always the case. However, for an interesting illustration given to us by the OP:She thinks there’s something about having a college education that ruins people’s faith. Do you feel the same way?
I can’t p(name removed by moderator)oint exactly when I started to openly question the faith. I think it must have begun at university. People would come to me and ask me my opinion on complex matters. I tried my best to answer them with the mind of the Church, but I became aware of the weakness of my position and the strength of their arguments. In my studies too I was beginning to learn to think critically and increasingly becoming aware of the holes in the Faith.
Nevertheless, I soldiered on. I had bad experiences with faithless nuns, priests and laity; I attended my share of scandalous lectures and liturgies. I reacted to all this at the time by focusing on getting my degree over with, telling my examiners what they wanted to hear, and mixing in my spare time in increasingly conservative and traditionalist circles.
I’ve read enough about the scandalous behavior of “teachers” in “Catholic” universities to understand that a young persons still-forming faith can be seriously undermined by the opinions of liberal professors.After a while I discovered there were just as many troubled souls in conservative and traditionalist camps as there were in the liberal camp. There didn’t appear to be much critical thinking or scholarship going on either; this made me wonder if these groups had any intellectual rigour. I continued on regardless, but the doubts kept nagging, and I guess I just began giving in to them.
Okay. Well, you posted this:Yes, I’ve seen that link before. It didn’t seem to have any points that I hadn’t heard before.
There are multiple instances where God commands and/or approves of killing children (cf. Ezekiel 9:5f, Jeremiah 51:22, Isaiah 13:15f, 1 Samuel 15:2, Joshua 6:20, and many more). There are cases where God approves of rape (Exodus 21:7f, Judges 5:30, Zachariah 14:2, etc.).
And the question in the link I gave you was:I’m not arguing that God–if there is a God–is evil. Only that the God described in the Old Testament approved of some things that are very hard to accept. The Church says that using simple blastocysts consiting of a small number of cells for scientific research is wrong, but the Old Testament approves of slaughtering whole nations. There seems to be a big disconnect there.
Seems like a pretty similar question and Jimmy thoroughly and completely dissects this question and answers it thoughtfully. If you have “heard this all before” than why do you feel your questions are still unanswered?How could a God that supposedly loves us perform genocide on us at the same time?
I’m a 46 y/o cradle Catholic who was agnostic for a period of time, during my early adult years. It wasn’t a choice I made; one can’t choose or not choose what they believe or don’t believe any more than they can choose to like or dislike the color blue. I got tired of people who had the attitude I was doing something evil by not being convinced of the same beliefs they had. Over time my beliefs eventually changed and I do believe in God now but again, that wasn’t a choice, either, although I longed for God, or something to believe in even when I wasn’t sure I believed in Him.I don’t think most atheists or agnostics “choose” to not believe. For them, they “choose” not to believe in God in the same way most people choose not to believe in Santa Claus.
I didn’t mean the previous post to be distressing. Like I said, when I admitted it to myself, I found a bit of peace.
I have to agree with this. If any of you have been reading the Jesus’ Tomb thread you might see some parallels to what’s being discussed here. Forgive the cliche’, but God gave me a brain and He expects me to use it. To do otherwise leads some people to the sort of tragedies you mentioned above, though I’m not suggesting the Catholic Church is in any way like the cults you spoke about. Still, to blindly follow without question is to not use the amazing brain the Lord blessed us with.I’m sorry but that’s like belonging to a cult. You can’t give up your responsibility to make moral decisions just like that. I know people like direction but that sort of philosophy leads to the Poisoned Kool-Aid or stockade siege scenario.
.
Do you mean the people who were judgemental prior to me becoming agnostic or during that period when I was unsure?Faith1960, would you say that people being overly judgmental and prescriptive affected your faith at all during those early adult years?
If you look at the comments section there, you can see that this isn’t a cut and dried “answer”. There are a lot of issues that remain.Seems like a pretty similar question and Jimmy thoroughly and completely dissects this question and answers it thoughtfully. If you have “heard this all before” than why do you feel your questions are still unanswered?
You are correct to a certain extent. In other words, faith is a gift from God. Those who have it believe, those who don’t have it don’t believe. BUT…1) When God does grant the gift of faith, one does have to choose to accept it, in accord with free will; God doesn’t force His grace on anyone. 2) Faith is nourished and increased through prayer and acts of faith; in other words, we must exercise our faith if we want to keep it. And that also takes a choice. So there’s a fine balance here.It wasn’t a choice I made; one can’t choose or not choose what they believe or don’t believe any more than they can choose to like or dislike the color blue.
I feel the same way sometimes. On some things it seems like the deeper I go, the more complexity I find. When I get really frustated and feel my mind clouding over, I try to just trust my past self to have made rational decisions - and I figure that even if I can’t prove this-or-that is true, I can at least postulate that it is and see how the chips fall. (Most the time, I think my doubts have more to do with emotions and my general disposition than anything rational. Thank goodness for CS Lewis - have you tried him at all?) When it comes to positions on moral issues that are linked to my faith, I figure “if there’s any doubt, don’t do it” is the way to go.
Then again, I’ve seen on a few occasions that there are serious parts of me that don’t want to believe in God. I wonder how much of my doubts are rooted in that.
Well, the problem with saying that is that very often the doctrines that are the most fragile and questionable are the ones labelled “not for debate”.My response: We have brains and are supposed to use them, but not all issues about doctrine and morals are up for debate.