A
Augusta_Sans
Guest
Enlighten me.Those are nice, but you’re missing the mark
Enlighten me.Those are nice, but you’re missing the mark
But the playfulness and all that sometimes takes a good 2 or MORE years to get to. I have said it before in these forums and I’ll say it again, I believe for MOST couples, the first year of marriage is THE hardest. My first year was utterly miserable, well make that the first 18 months to two years actually. And the sexual chemistry, and getting all of that ‘down’ so that we were in sync with each other took that long too.
I think what you’re hearing people remember is how they are looking back on their relationship in the early years, which isn’t necessarily how it actually WAS. 20 years out you may fee nostalgic because of what you’ve become together and the times you’ve gone through, but time has a way of making memories look rosier than they really were literally, kind of like women forget the pain of childbirth; you have to if you’re going to move on in life. Just becasue someone tells you they had fun playful close loving times early in marriage, doesn’t meant they also didn’t have hard, distant, struggling times.
That’s great !! and yes, you’ll know, THAT’S the thing: there is no end to what one may discover when actually listening to his spouse: the more you know, the more there is to know. It is soooo beautiful to realise that, should you, any day, get the impression that you’ve “seen it all”, you just need to really sit together, get the talking on again, and… bam, you’ll see new things !More baby steps.
We’ve been dialoguing every day. Last night we learned that we both were terrified to learn how to drive. It was fun for us to learn something new about each other after all this time. It’s heartening to know that, no matter how well you know someone, there’s always something more.
HAHAHA ! Again, I’m sooooo seeing myself / ourselves in your situation. When attending a Marriage Encounter weekend a few months before our wedding, we put “communication” as one of our good points.I thought that we were expert communicators (you might remember my reluctance to attend Retrouvaille–“what do WE have to learn?”) but we’re finding out that we were excellent at discussing things but not feelings.
Yes !!!We’re also kind of p(name removed by moderator)ointing the things that spiraled out of control. Basically, we’re discovering that even though we were best friends, we were still living our lives as “married singles.” We always thought that the best marriages were built on the best friendships, but we didn’t really know (and still don’t know) how to take it beyond “just friends”. I’m hopeful that we’ll learn.
Great, too… and actually, reading good books together and talking about one’s feeling and reactions to them is SUCH a great way of tackling sensitive topics in a more open, listening way !He’s reading Holy Sex now. When I read it, I marked the pages that were most interesting to me, so as he reads, we’re discussing both the ones that intrigue him as well as the ones that intrigued me. We’re both excited to learn that, to Catholics, sex is more than “tab A in slot B = orgasm.” Last night’s dialogue question was “what goals do you hope to accomplish over the next few months.” He said that he would like to resume our sexual relationship and have me move back home.![]()
To avoid the sin of scandal, it would be prudent to marry civilly before you resume a sexual relationship.Last night’s dialogue question was “what goals do you hope to accomplish over the next few months.” He said that he would like to resume our sexual relationship and have me move back home.![]()
I am not sure what the process is here since they have a divorce, however, no annulment (correct me if I missed that) so aren’t they still married in the eyes of the Church? I cannot speak to what the steps necessary (from the Catholic Church’s perspective) to “be married again” and resume a sexual relationship. Maybe someone would enlighten me?To avoid the sin of scandal, it would be prudent to marry civilly before you resume a sexual relationship.
As far as the Church is concerned they’re still married, so no scandal as far as the Church is concerned. I can’t speak for people outside the Church, but given today’s attitudes towards sex I doubt there would be a scandle there.I am not sure what the process is here since they have a divorce, however, no annulment (correct me if I missed that) so aren’t they still married in the eyes of the Church? I cannot speak to what the steps necessary (from the Catholic Church’s perspective) to “be married again” and resume a sexual relationship. Maybe someone would enlighten me?
That is what I was thinking…sorry to derail the thread for a moment.As far as the Church is concerned they’re still married, so no scandal as far as the Church is concerned. I can’t speak for people outside the Church, but given today’s attitudes towards sex I doubt there would be a scandle there.
I began entertaining the idea of reconciling with him in October (which is why I came here and posted my original post.) I don’t know exactly when it turned from an idea into a goal.Why did you decide to reconcile with your husband?
We talk almost every single day and wear our hearts on our sleeves. I knew he still loved me and wasn’t even considering dating anyone else.How did you know he would still be there waiting for you?
We were best friend before, during, and after. Our biggest problem is we were never anything but best friends throughout our entire courtship, marriage, divorce, and aftermath. After the divorce, we were still each other’s emotional support on all matters NOT related to our relationship. We both avoided talking about our feelings about our dissolved marriage.What kind of contact did you have after the divorce or type of relationship?
Please reread the following:Sometimes we find something unpleasant because we don’t see a purpose in it. But when we look at certain tasks in the larger view, they don’t seem so useless. Like running a house. No one likes to clean bathrooms. Is that a reason not to do it? But if you look upon it as an act of love for your family, keeping them healthy and keeping the home sanitary, it helps one do it. Somewhere along the line our society began teaching that if we didn’t enjoy doing something then we weren’t obligated to do it.
But when we see the enjoyment it brings to others, we can learn to enjoy what we are doing for them.
It’s like the prayer of St. Francis:
"It is in giving that we receive. "
The more we lose ourselves, the more we find ourselves.
To recap:I am a little annoyed with the process, but am committed to it. I do not like dialoguing or discussing my feelings (feels like a waste of time), though I really enjoy reading and talking about his feelings so I do look forward to that. I think sharing his feelings with me is liberating for him.
Yes.Hopefully you are enjoying the time you guys are spending together even if you don’t enjoy the dialouging.
Yeah, but have you talked about them with him? I think you mentioned that was a weak spot previously. There’s a world of difference between “talking about your feelings” and actually talking through your feelings for someone with that person. The latter offers more powerful oppertunities to gain insights.Yes.And again, I do enjoy 50% of dialoguing, I just am tired of talking about my feelings. Probably because I’ve been in counseling whenever I’m in school (it’s free to college students) so I’ve talked about my feelings a billion times.