P
phillylawyer
Guest
You are sweet. And yes, that does bring cheer to my heart! Go Pope Francis!!
You are sweet. And yes, that does bring cheer to my heart! Go Pope Francis!!
I agree with all of the above. And it was refreshing to see your post as I havenât found many Catholics today taking your POV. Especially if this forum is representative. In any case God bless you.I do favor a single-payer system, but Obamacare is what everybody has to work with now. You shouldnât feel guilty for using it.
And as a tax payer in a developed nation I would expect my tax dollars to be spent providing a certain level of medical care to those who canât afford it. It is the same as I expect fire and police protection regardless of anyoneâs ability to pay their fair share. I view it as money well spent if I get to benefit from a country without a sick and diseased population.
i also favor a single payer system (with some hesitation). My biggest hesitation is, under the current direction of our country, can you possibly imagine single payer being supported without that insurance also cover abortion? I canât. Itâs a foregone conclusion that in todayâs political climate, along with single payer comes federally funded abortion.I agree with all of the above. And it was refreshing to see your post as I havenât found many Catholics today taking your POV. Especially if this forum is representative. In any case God bless you.
Oh good grief! I spent the last few years listening to how the sky was going to fall because of Obamacare. Now that it is the law and it seems to be somewhat successful, the story is that there is no such thing! Obamacare consists of mandatory medical insurance with private companies - thatâs what it is! There was never any true National Health Insurance because people werenât read for that.Sorry, last comment. Itâs actually been liberals and supporters of Obama trying to make this exact point that there is no such thing as âObamaCareâ health insurance.
Here is Senator Angus King on it:
âYou know, thereâs no such thing as Obamacare,â King told Fox News Sunday. âYou canât sign up for âObamacare.â You sign up for an Anthem policy or an Aetna policy or a WellPoint policy. Itâs private insurance,â he said.
cnsnews.com/news/article/susan-jones/sen-angus-king-theres-no-such-thing-obamacare
I see your point.Oh good grief! I spent the last few years listening to how the sky was going to fall because of Obamacare. Now that it is the law and it seems to be somewhat successful, the story is that there is no such thing! Obamacare consists of mandatory medical insurance with private companies - thatâs what it is! There was never any true National Health Insurance because people werenât read for that.
Are you responding to a different post? I donât mean to be rude, but I honestly donât know what you are responding to.Oh good grief! I spent the last few years listening to how the sky was going to fall because of Obamacare. Now that it is the law and it seems to be somewhat successful, the story is that there is no such thing! Obamacare consists of mandatory medical insurance with private companies - thatâs what it is! There was never any true National Health Insurance because people werenât read for that.
I donât know. I know birth control has often been covered long before Obamacare partly because sometimes it is needed for health concerns. Women do have the legal right to choose an abortion without restrictions at least in the first trimester whether we like it or not. So maybe.i also favor a single payer system (with some hesitation). My biggest hesitation is, under the current direction of our country, can you possibly imagine single payer being supported without that insurance also cover abortion? I canât. Itâs a foregone conclusion that in todayâs political climate, along with single payer comes federally funded abortion.
Exactly. This is why, if America ever adopted single payer, politicians and abortion rights groups would insist that single payer insurance policies must cover abortions. This means, unlike (arguably) now, our tax dollars would be required to pay for abortions. One of the reservations I have about single payer, even though in general I think it is the best option to provide insurance for those in need and bring down the spiraling cost of health care in this country.I donât know. I know birth control has often been covered long before Obamacare partly because sometimes it is needed for health concerns. Women do have the legal right to choose an abortion without restrictions at least in the first trimester whether we like it or not. So maybe.
And what about when private charity doesnât provide enough? Just let people starve and go homeless? This is where the GOP stance strongly contrasts with the teachings of Jesus. This forum would make Him sad many times over, I think.:yup:
The government shouldnât be propping up those who do not succeed in the free market. **Private charity and private institutions such as religion should take the torch in helping out those in need. **
That would happen more if the government would just get OUT of it and be a regulator.
I hope youâre being satirical. âDeath panelsâ are like the most ridiculous myth. Itâs like saying, âBeware the Yeti on your next hiking trip.âObama himself hasnât read the bill for âObamacareâ. He doesnât know whatâs in it. And your family signed up for it?
Beware the death panels is all I can say.
It controls cost by denying services. Happens all the time in Canada and the UK.even though in general I think it is the best option to provide insurance for those in need and bring down the spiraling cost of health care in this country.
=Et Cetera;12196985]Also, Obama could cure cancer, world hunger, all diseases, and create peace in the Middle East, and this forum would still condemn him.
What TV channel would that be?Itâs likely due to a lot of the people on here watching a TV channel whose sole purpose seems to be smearing the President as well as any of his followers.
FDS - Fox Derangement Syndrome
Thatâs too general and confrontational, I might add. There are lots of people on here who support President Obama. âThis forumâ hardly has one voice, and the prior comment just seems to elicit sympathy for the President.
What TV channel would that be?
Not everyone agrees with President Obama, and frankly his policies have been one failure after another.
Courage? It takes courage to let the âlosersâ die?The problem is that nobody has the courage to let the losers wither and die. If the winners will be responsible for the losers healthcare eventually it will be cheaper to pay preventative care rather than let things escalate to an emergency. There is such a thing as being penny wise and pound foolish as Easterjoy was pointing out.
I always hear that argument and it fails drastically. Because before Obamacare it happened all the time in the US that people were denied or forced to ration their healthcare services because they couldnât afford the cost. By healthcare I donât mean a trip to the ER when things got dire. Iâm talking about adequate healthcare like preventive care, dr checkups, regular prescriptions, things like that. Obamacare is not perfect. Some still canât afford the cost. But more can.It controls cost by denying services. Happens all the time in Canada and the UK.
Itâs not insurance; itâs the government deciding who lives and who dies.
2 good questions. Which is why I agree.And what about when private charity doesnât provide enough? Just let people starve and go homeless? This is where the GOP stance strongly contrasts with the teachings of Jesus. This forum would make Him sad many times over, I think.
Private charity will do much better than the government, because private charities are bound by the free market forces.=Et Cetera;12196970]And what about when private charity doesnât provide enough? Just let people starve and go homeless? This is where the GOP stance strongly contrasts with the teachings of Jesus.
Again, I wouldnât be generalizing about the forum. Itâs too diverse.This forum would make Him sad many times over, I think.
See post # 59.2 good questions. Which is why I agree.
There is no rightâConstitutional or otherwiseâto an abortion.Women do have the legal right to choose an abortion without restrictions at least in the first trimester whether we like it or not. So maybe.