My girlfriend is a Baptist

  • Thread starter Thread starter Avood
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sounds good…Except the Catholic should be attending Mass every week. 😃 It’s possible that he could attend a Saturday Vigil Mass and then go to the Baptist church on Sunday morning when it’s “her” turn, but alternating Sundays would not work for a faithful Catholic. :tsktsk:
True- missing mass for a Catholic=mortal sin. Missing church for a Baptist= no penalty at all(remember they believe all sins, past, present and future have been taken care of and God can’t punish you for what He chooses to no longer remember). I have been attending the 0700 Sunday morning Mass so I can attend the Baptist church with my husband at 1000. This is temporary until I complete RCIA and then I am done. It is far too aggravating to have to listen to doctrine I no longer believe and the anti-Catholicism that goes along with it.
 
All debating aside, whether or not it is “allowed” is not at issue, but whether it is advisable. The CC says it is permissible, but it is not advised, and actually needs permission from ecclesiastical authority (CCC 1633-34) I think thes pretty well settles the issue. It is not to be advised . “Rome has spoken; the issue is settled”
very well put CW. we put alot more thought into simpler things in life. and i cannot understand why we wouldnt do the same thing here. before i bought a dog, i did the research. i personally thought i would be good with a rottweiler, but after studying different breeds, i found out i was better suited for pit bulls. not everybody is. i wouldnt advise just anyone get this type of dog. it takes a certain personality to raise a happy healthy pit. after putting that much time in effort into the simple act of picking out a dog, why would anybody pick a life partner, without weighing all the pros and cons. to even see if they are suited for marriage. its a heavier choice than our culture makes it out to be. could be thats why we have such a high divorce rate in the west. i wish i would have had the council of Rome before i married. if i would have had that guidance sooner in life, alot of bad things could have been avoided. thank God for Catholic authority. its a benifit. Peace 🙂
 
I don’t understand.
A relationship with Christ Jesus is anything but ordinary.
And how is it contingent upon theology?
For clarity, there is such a thing as ordenary as opposed to extrodenary salvation. But we’re about to take this conversation on a left turn. If you want futher clarification, I invite you to quote my post in a new thread and reask your question where it can be delt with more specifically.
 
“(remember they believe all sins, past, present and future have been taken care of and God can’t punish you for what He chooses to no longer remember).”

I was asking if this idea/belief was considered to be false/a grave misconception?
 
Not true. I was not Catholic when my fiance (cradle Catholic) and I became engaged, and it wasn’t a problem for either of us. One of my favorite “date” activities was going to Mass with him. I would never ask anyone to give up their spiritual beliefs, even if I disagreed with them.

Miz
Absolutely! I respect my beloved’s faith – I feel that his faith makes him the man I have grown to respect and love… just as my faith has made me who I am. To undermine his Catholic faith would be morally wrong, and the inverse is also true. Anyway, re the earlier post, not all Baptists are adhered to contraceptives. I’m not. The more kids, the merrier. I’m also a virgin, so that’s not just Catholics, either. If you really love your partner, you’ll respect what’s important to them, even in sex.
 
… I’m also a virgin, so that’s not just Catholics, either. If you really love your partner, you’ll respect what’s important to them, even in sex.
👍

It may be tempting (especially since it’s apparently no big deal for a 15 year old to have a baby these days), but it’s part of the awesome package you get with marriage.
 
For clarity, there is such a thing as ordenary as opposed to extrodenary salvation. But we’re about to take this conversation on a left turn. If you want futher clarification, I invite you to quote my post in a new thread and reask your question where it can be delt with more specifically.
What is the best way of doing this?
 
“(remember they believe all sins, past, present and future have been taken care of and God can’t punish you for what He chooses to no longer remember).”

I was asking if this idea/belief was considered to be false/a grave misconception?
This “past, present and future” automatic forgiveness is part of the false notion of Once Saved, Always Saved that developed in the 16th century. Jesus and the Apostles never taught it; consequently, Catholicism rejects it.

Peace be with you.
 
Anyway, re the earlier post, not all Baptists are adhered to contraceptives. I’m not. The more kids, the merrier. I’m also a virgin, so that’s not just Catholics, either. If you really love your partner, you’ll respect what’s important to them, even in sex.
Reformed Baptists and some Fundamentalists are known for their love of large families. The Duggars are a well known example. I decided against contraceptives well before I decided to become Catholic. If God considers children to be a blessing (and the Bible clearly says he does), then why would I try to stop or avoid a God-given blessing? (This is not to say I would tell any particular woman she needed to have more children-I have no idea what individual circumstances are). Chemical contraceptives are bad for women and the IUD and the pill are known abortifacients.

I would hope that no one would think that any faith had the corner market on love of virtue and love of children. I pray that you adhere to virtue and honor always.
 
What is the best way of doing this?
One good way is quote the portion of my post you would like addressed as if you were going to reply to this thread. Then select the whole thing, and press ctrl + c to copy it (or right click on the selected text, and select copy). Then back out to the main “non-catholic forum” and click “new post” (or whatever it is). Then give the thread a good title, like “SPLIT: My girlfriend is baptist” so we can identify what the context of your question is. Then go ahead and paste in that text you copied earlier, either using ctrl + v, or right click paste, and type in your questions.

God bless,
 
One good way is quote the portion of my post you would like addressed as if you were going to reply to this thread. Then select the whole thing, and press ctrl + c to copy it (or right click on the selected text, and select copy). Then back out to the main “non-catholic forum” and click “new post” (or whatever it is). Then give the thread a good title, like “SPLIT: My girlfriend is baptist” so we can identify what the context of your question is. Then go ahead and paste in that text you copied earlier, either using ctrl + v, or right click paste, and type in your questions.

God bless,
Then whenever you are ready, its been started.
 
I think you should stop seeing her - it will only be difficulties later on.
 
No one is suggesting that unions between CAtholics will be trouble free, but why invite problems. Why would one enter a relationship that would by its nature introduce avoidable problems?
 
if it did not become a problem, then yours is the exception, not the rule. If is were not an issue, why would the Church caution against it?
 
The “rapture” the way it is understood by evangelicals is a complete fabrication based on taking a couple of verses out of their literary and cultural context
I think we should step back and define our terms. When we say we don’t accept “the rapture” as portrayed by modern Evangelicals, we mean that we don’t accept a “pre-tribulation rapture”. That is, we do not believe the man-made doctrine that Jesus will remove all of the Christians from the earth prior to the final tribulation prophesied by Jesus.

What we do accept and believe is the biblical teaching that, at the second coming (at the last trumpet), all the righteous dead will rise from their graves, then we believers who are still alive will be changed in the twinkling of an eye [to our glorious bodies]. Then we will all be caught up (“raptured”) to meet the Lord in the air.
15 For this we say to you by the word of the Lord, that we who are alive and remain until the coming of the Lord will by no means precede those who are asleep. 16 For the Lord Himself will descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of an archangel, and with the trumpet of God. And the dead in Christ will rise first. 17 Then we who are alive and remain shall be caught up together with them in the clouds to meet the Lord in the air. And thus we shall always be with the Lord. 18 Therefore comfort one another with these words.
  • 1 Thess 4:15-18
51 Behold, I tell you a mystery: We shall not all sleep, but we shall all be changed— 52 in a moment, in the twinkling of an eye, at the last trumpet. For the trumpet will sound, and the dead will be raised incorruptible, and we shall be changed. 53 For this corruptible must put on incorruption, and this mortal must put on immortality. 54 So when this corruptible has put on incorruption, and this mortal has put on immortality, then shall be brought to pass the saying that is written: “Death is swallowed up in victory.”[a]
55 “ O Death, where is your sting?
O Hades, where is your victory?”
  • 1 Cor 15:51-55
 
there certainly is less stress, being single and celibate. i wouldnt have it any other way. sometimes i miss having a girlfriend. especially when i see a very pretty woman… but then it think of all the headaches, stress, and garbage that go with a relationship, and guess what? i get over those temptations very quickly!😛 Peace 🙂
 
,she is a Baptist ,
Well, that’s gotta be taken care of, huh?

Truth is, the only thing that matters here is what the children end up as–and this is a very simple equation which you can see at work in the dozens of mixed marriages throughout this country.

The way the equation works is like this: whichever parent’s culture/religion erects dominating religious images in the child’s nascent mental-emotional landscape will determine which the child grows to identify with.

Don’t believe me?–look at the interminable line of celebrities who have had mixed secular Jewish-Christian parentage. Secular Judaism in America doesn’t boast an especially strong gravitational field, in religious terms–most Jews who describe themselves thusly would feel out of place even at Temple. But yet, the experience of being ‘labeled Jewish,’ going on a Birthright trip, and experiencing a traditional meal commands much more psychological impact than simply ‘going through the motions’ to enter the Church (i.e., Baptism, &c.–give or take a step). Naturally, most end up around their 20s and 30s describing themselves as Jewish.

So, what I am saying, is that the biggest concern–the Catholic belief of your children–has hopeful probabilities, even with one of those 50-50 upbringings. The Baptist way of life is disintegrating, even in the American heartland, and Catholicism–if anything–is on the wax.

These are dark days for mainstream Protestants, and as long as we can still keep our Cathedrals, our Magisterium, and our priests, the Catholic world will remain at the heart of Christ’s Church.

Just stand firm, and remember not to make concessions… but still be gentle. Things will work themselves out, by hook or by crook. 😉
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top