No more eye rolling. Furtive glancing may be acceptable…
Also look after and console the woman who complained. How can you help her?
No…I mean, not if you mean the behavior going on about this incident. No furtive glancing. That is just covert aggression. Either talk to him about what upset you or don’t, but do not let the sun go down on a grudge. If this kind of thing were to happen again, I’d suggest just making yourself scarce, just as you would if you came around the corner on someone having a private cell phone conversation. Try to avoid hearing what it is better not shared with you and try to avoid being used as a pawn in anyone’s petty public disputes. Just leave.
If the woman is not demented, he did have the authority and duty to correct her. He did it in a poor way, but his refusal to accept her excuses for violating the sacred silence of adoration when there wasn’t a fire or threat to life but only a matter of her personal comfort was not out of line in and of itself. She was the one who was out of line by making excuses for why she needed to violate the sacred silence in order to lodge a complaint that could have waited for a more suitable time.
In other words, they were both wrong. It is reasonable to pass over the faults of both of them and it would be a work of mercy to console either one of them if they are beating themselves up about their lapses, but it would be out of place to help them make excuses for themselves based on the lapse of the other one.
If the woman has enough going on mentally to be at adoration at all, she needs to accept that her hearing is not what it was and that she should not speak out during adoration, but find another way to communicate. She should accept this correction, not argue with it. She should also accept that there is no perfect temperature for the adoration chapel, and someone is going to have to live with a temperature that they don’t like. (At least if it is too cold, people can put on more clothing. Those who are too hot hardly have that option, do they, LOL?)
As for the priest, of course he shouldn’t have loudly corrected an adult in front of everyone if he could avoid it at all, but the thread has been well over that. Just as he has the greater position of trust and is rightly held to a higher standard of behavior than other adults by virtue of his pastoral office, just so he has a greater authority and the woman owes it to him to accept the temperature he set with obedience, rather than quibbling with him–also in public, I might add, which is not how someone in a position of authority ought to be treated, either.