…I did not mean to be offensive at all, just wanted to hear of other people’s experiences…I guess if she did have a personality disorder then it would explain 20 years for me and a lifetime for my husband on why she acts the way she does. I hope that makes sense…
Yes. Here is the thing: The key is not in getting a “label” for everyone. The key is to treat others with a balance of mercy and justice that allows you to treat everyone the same. It takes both firmness and generosity.
This is how I’ve found that knowing about sociopaths helps me even when I’m not dealing with sociopaths: even non-sociopaths will sometimes press for personal advantage in inappropriate ways, because sociopaths aren’t the only ones who can be self-centered, willing to deceive to gain an advantage, or choose not to care about anyone else for a little while. Knowing how to deal with alcoholics helps me even when I’m not dealing with alcoholics, because alcoholics aren’t the only ones who let their obsessions with one certain thing lead to neglect of the needs of others. Know how to deal with a borderline personality will help even when you are not dealing with a borderline personality. Why? Because while there are very emotionally labile people and very steady people, most people bounce around somewhere between the extremes,
including each of us. Listen to what Our Lord had to say about the Father: his sun shines and his rain rains down on the just and the unjust alike. Justice and mercy, the same for everyone.
I mean that when you run across someone who uses a lot of foul language, you keep in mind both that their habitual behavior is inappropriate
and that they may have a limited amount of self-control, that they may be suffering some kind of enslavement. You base your expectations of how they will act in the future on how they have acted in the past: those are their limitations. You don’t have to be the detective and figure out what that is, but just handle them based on their behavior in a way that is suitable whether or not their behavior is their “fault.” You don’t give them permission to cross boundaries, but enforce the boundaries without hurting them. I mean this: if you have deer mowing down your garden, the answer is not to shoot the deer or just wave goodbye to all your lettuce and snap peas. The answer is a deer fence, a very tall fence that lets light into the garden but keeps intruders out. If the problem is rabbits, you would have the same boundary, but you’d have to resort to a different sort of fence. If nothing has been bothering your garden, maybe you have no “fence,” but you still know where the boundary is, the place where your jurisdiction starts or ends. If the deer or the rabbits are starving, you can get some hay or something and take care of them outside the fence, but you have to eat, too.
This requires both justice–enforcing boundaries even when the intruder has limited capacity not to cross them–and mercy–seeing to the needs of others without judging why their behaviors are what they are when we don’t have authority to mold their behaviors directly.
Teachers, coaches, pastors, and parents bringing up children, for instance, have the authority and the duty to look into why their charges behave in a certain way. They have a duty to intervene when one of their charges needs to improve their behavior or their attitude, to learn about and sometimes correct their perceptions of themselves and the world, to teach them to act in appropriate ways, to research the reasons they fail, to help them to find the help they need to overcome deficits in self-control and self-care, and so on. Most of the rest of us, however, will not have any peace unless we let go of concerning ourselves with being everyone else’s pastor or mother or teacher or coach and simply deal with others with as much justice and mercy as we can muster.
If someone comes to you struggling because they are always violating other people’s boundaries, you can suggest different ways they might cope with that, but in the end you have to allow them to be the captain of their own destiny and the master of their own problems. If someone not under your jurisdiction and not posing a threat of serious harm to themselves or others doesn’t ask for your advice, though, consider that they may not
want your advice. Put boundaries on yourself, too, then. Do not thirst for control over others, but be willing to generously give them as much room as you reasonably can.
Of course, if someone starts behaving in ways that are very out of character and counter-productive, it is OK to discern that it is time to make an inquiry–hey, this is not like you, are you OK? Are we OK? After all, sometimes it is not the other person who has changed, but you who have changed, and you are seeing their response to the change in
you.
This also requires that we enforce integrity on our own actions–we don’t give ourselves permission to occasionally do what those with mental disorders might habitually do because they don’t have the capacity to do better. If you let yourself tell lies once in awhile, how do you draw a boundary with a sociopath? If you expect others to allow you to harm yourself if you want to or don’t think anyone should adjust their expectations of you when you are emotionally labile, how do you draw a boundary with a borderline personality? If give yourself permission to leave graciousness behind when someone offends you, what are you going to expect when you commit a faux pas? This isn’t just a matter of mercy or justice, but mercy and justice, and as much as we each can muster, with the expectation of needing forgiveness, needing to openly and without making excuses admit we’ve done wrong and expressing sorrow, and making some kind of amends for our offenses when it is all over.