Stephen168
New member
I think you are right if that is all Catholic20064 was saying. It seems to me, what is being said is more anti-cleric than anti-celibacy.This is unfair to Catholic20064.
People who think this way certainly can still call themselves Catholic. Celibacy is a discipline that can be changed. Therefore someone holding the position that it should be changed is not committing a sin or being a “bad” catholic.
The Catholic Church needs to seriously consider enabling more **unpaid lay married men **to act in the role of priest **like the LDS Church does. **
Why can’t married men perform priestly functions? Why couldn’t an **unpaid lay person perform the duties of a priest **if the congregations were smaller?
Let the** lay married men become unpaid priests** and give up their lay status.
What it tells me is the Catholic priesthood as presently constituted is seriously failing in its work. ………. That may mean changing some traditions which are hampering the work – there is no reason unpaid married male clergy could not be a part of that solution unless those in power are more concerned about maintaining their grip on that power than they are about bringing people to God.
And so ends the Year of the Priest.I look forward to the day when married men are allowed to become priests within the Latin Rite. I believe many faithful married men would make wonderful priests. While there is a place for a professional priesthood, I do think that** unpaid men could be called to the priesthood** in order to make the mass and other sacraments more accessible in areas where there are shortages of priests. It would strengthen the church to increase the availability of the sacraments.