G
guanophore
Guest
I had this discussion in mind on Friday. The Catholic school kids come to Mass on Friday morning, and Monsigniour lets them ask him three questions after the homily. One little girl asked why women can’t be priests. The church does not believe she has the authority to ordain priests, since there is no precedent for it. I got to wondering, what did Jesus talk about after His resurrection?Contarini, you say you are not suggesting that Jesus and the apostles acted out
of coincidence by selecting male apostolic successors. But in the same breath you
ask how do I know that Jesus just didn’t pick twelve people at random at that place
and time. I would consider the random selection of twelve males, and not any females
included, a remarkable coincidence, unless Jesus had a reason for selecting only males.
I’m afraid you contradict yourself, leaving your argument in shambles.
I fail to see any faulty analogy on my part. For we are still left with the biblical fact
that Jesus asked us to address God as our Father. Notwithstanding
God’s spiritual transcendence, our Lord did not ask us to call God our Mother. Nor
did he address his heavenly Father as Mother. Again, there was no random choice
of words on our Lord’s part. The paternal appellation was used by Jesus for a reason.
Of course, our Lord refrained from getting into needless explanations about
his preference for the male gender when addressing God and choosing his apostles.
He simply left us an example to follow by his solemn words and deeds. The Catholic Church
recognizes and espouses our Lord’s wishes without the rationalizations Protestants
are noted for, fallible speculations on their part that explains the doctrinal divisions and discord
in the Protestant movement of a plurality of Churches. The Sacred Magisterium infallibly
teaches that females cannot be ordained as priests primarily because Jesus left us no example.
Nor did the apostles and the early Church. I have my sacred Traditions which are based on
Sacred Scriptures to guide my beliefs. I do not have to speculate and rationalize like you do.
Our discussion is getting nowhere, so I will end it now on my part. God bless you.![]()
Acts 1:3
3 To them he presented himself alive after his passion by many proofs, appearing to them during forty days, and speaking of the kingdom of God."
And why did he not, during that time, ordain another apostle? Why did he leave this unfinished for Peter to do? Could he not have chosen a woman at that time? Why not Mary, to whom He revealed Himself first?
He chose not to do this, and the spirit that has been leading the church since the ascention chose not to do so. Many special women have been chosen, annointed, empowered, and received revelations…
No ordination…
:byzsoc: