E
Efrain
Guest
Because she is a Protestant herself.What makes you think SinginBeauty is talking about Protestants specifically?
Edwin
Because she is a Protestant herself.What makes you think SinginBeauty is talking about Protestants specifically?
Edwin
Above, you offered to give the history of the Goths. I think that would be interesting to read. What is the history of the Goths?You are just trying to be a bully “I am calling your bluff”
Who cares. Your ignorance shows in the fact that you have thrown up a smoke screen and have not answered any of my questions. You simply go on the attack like a vulture looking for crumbs of rotten meat to make yourself look glorius taking away the questions asked. Is that the best you can do. Are you a Jesuit. You certainly act like one.
Bet you would like another inquisition. Then only you could ask the question and give the answers and then burn me at the stake.
And how is that relevant?Because she is a Protestant herself.
Sorry Edwin! I just have to laugh!You are just trying to be a bully “I am calling your bluff”
Who cares. Your ignorance shows in the fact that you have thrown up a smoke screen and have not answered any of my questions. You simply go on the attack like a vulture looking for crumbs of rotten meat to make yourself look glorius taking away the questions asked. Is that the best you can do. Are you a Jesuit. You certainly act like one.
Bet you would like another inquisition. Then only you could ask the question and give the answers and then burn me at the stake.
Oh, not everyone here is Catholic…Contarini said:Exactly. I have no problems with Catholics saying that Anglicanism is heretical. I have a problem with Catholics misrepresenting Anglicanism or assuming that just because I’m not Catholic therefore I am hostile to Catholicism. I became Anglican to get closer to Catholicism!
Edwin
No, I’m trying to get to the truth. Post your evidence, or at least explain what you are talking about. It is not my fault that you can’t do this–calling me names will not help you.You are just trying to be a bully “I am calling your bluff”
What questions? The only question you have asked me is how I know what I know about the Goths. And since you made the claim first, you have to back it up first. I’m simply challenging you in the light of common knowledge, which you can acquire by picking up any book (or even no doubt reading Wikipedia) about the late Roman Empire, or early Christianity, or Germanic languages.Your ignorance shows in the fact that you have thrown up a smoke screen and have not answered any of my questions.
It’s probably not funny to Lively Stone. Many fundamentalists believe that Jesuits regularly impersonate members of other churches.Sorry Edwin! I just have to laugh!
The idea of an Anglican-Jesuit is funny to me…
How does that lyric from that song “Mr. Grinch” (Dr Seuss) go? I think it something like “I wouldn’t touch you with a thirty-nine-and-a-half foot pole!”It’s probably not funny to Lively Stone. Many fundamentalists believe that Jesuits regularly impersonate members of other churches.
You should read the Chick tract on the origins of the KJV sometime. It’s one of the less offensive (relatively!) and more hilarious tracts. It claims that many of the KJV translators were Jesuits, but King James posted guards to stand over them and make sure they didn’t change the translation. There is a cool picture of very grim-looking pikemen glaring at villainous Jesuit translators. The tract does not explain whether these were unusually well-educated pikemen, who understood Greek and Hebrew and thus could check the accuracy of the translation!
Edwin
I used to get those tracts all the time, thought they were great, now I consider them blasphemeous!How does that lyric from that song “Mr. Grinch” (Dr Seuss) go? I think it something like “I wouldn’t touch you with a thirty-nine-and-a-half foot pole!”
That’s how I feel about Chick and his tracks. However, I’m personally trying to get over that feeling. After all how can I “defend” my faith (Catholicism) if I don’t know what “offense” has up their sleeve?
Well have a good one Edwin and God Bless.
Oh, I feel the same way. I almost kept this particular one, because as I said it was a relatively innocuous and very funny example. (My wife–then my girlfriend or fiancee, I can’t remember which–found it inside a book in the stacks of the Duke Divinity School library where she worked. Apparently someone was going around sticking these tracts into the books with the idea of converting the liberals of the Divinity School, or something.) But I didn’t like to keep it around. And something like the “Death Cookie” tract–well, let’s just say that Lively Stone might be confirmed in his fears of my inquisitorial tendencies if he saw how I respond to that piece of filth and blasphemy!How does that lyric from that song “Mr. Grinch” (Dr Seuss) go? I think it something like “I wouldn’t touch you with a thirty-nine-and-a-half foot pole!”
That’s how I feel about Chick and his tracks.
You asked a question I answered.And how is that relevant?
Not at all I never said such a thing.Are you suggesting that Protestants think the Body of Christ is confined to Protestants?
Protestants hold a wide range of different views. I do not claim to know all about Protestants but I do understand the fundamentals and causes of the reformation. I understand the doctrines of Sola Scriptura and Sola Fide which are held with most Evangelicals. On the other hand I will admit that my knowledge of “high churches” is somewhat limited.You really don’t know much about Protestants, do you? (Sure, some Protestants think this, but most do not.)
[/QUOTE]You asked a question I answered.
Right, but you don’t know that SinginBeauty is one of them.But it wasn’t an adequate answer, because you have no reason to think that by “the Body of Christ” SinginBeauty meant “Protestants.” Therefore your statement was illogical and unjust.
Also, many evangelicals believe that the Body of Christ is the Invisible Church, so they might not want to say that organized churches are “part” of the Body (because some members of any given church are likely not to be true members of the Body).
Edwin
Why would anyone know this, since you have given no evidence for it?Dont you know that by quoting the CCC is the SAME as quoting Joseph Smith, Mohammad, Jim Jones, David Koresh and other people who claim to be THE “church” and lead God’s people astray?.
I never said or thought such thing. I understood very well that SinginBeauty meant Protestants and Catholics as being the Body of Christ. So how is my statement illogical or unjust?But it wasn’t an adequate answer, because you have no reason to think that by “the Body of Christ” SinginBeauty meant “Protestants.” Therefore your statement was illogical and unjust.
I know for a fact that SinginBeauty is not one of them. I never thought or claimed otherwise. Maybe you need to re-read our posts.Right, but you don’t know that SinginBeauty is one of them.
If thats the case we must find a disorganized and disfunctional “church” to belong to the Body of Christ.Also, many evangelicals believe that the Body of Christ is the Invisible Church, so they might not want to say that organized churches are “part” of the Body (because some members of any given church are likely not to be true members of the Body).
Then what was the point of saying that Protestants only went back 500 years or so? In SiB’s theology, the Body of Christ could quite easily exist long before there were any Protestants.I never said or thought such thing. I understood very well that SinginBeauty meant Protestants and Catholics as being the Body of Christ.
Or we should accept the fact that we belong to churches all of whose members are not part of the Body. However, generally evangelicals think that you should try to ensure that as many as possible are.If thats the case we must find a disorganized and disfunctional “church” to belong to the Body of Christ.
Who needs to force? Mary was visited by an angel. What would YOU do? Say “no”? She submitted to God’s Will. That’s it.So are you saying that Mary DID NOT have free will??
Are you saying that God forced Mary to conceive??
Pentecostals was with Jesus. The Church was born on Pentecost.Then what was the point of saying that Protestants only went back 500 years or so? In SiB’s theology, the Body of Christ could quite easily exist long before there were any Protestants.
Or we should accept the fact that we belong to churches all of whose members are not part of the Body. However, generally evangelicals think that you should try to ensure that as many as possible are.
I do not agree with this theology–I’m just describing it. I grew up believing it, until a professor in college challenged it in ways I could not refute.
Edwin
Some of the canons and traditions of the RCC contradicts Scripture and yet, because your pope says so, you put his words above the Word.Why would anyone know this, since you have given no evidence for it?
Edwin
Pentecostals was with Jesus. The Church was born on Pentecost.
No, we listen to the words of the Pope and Bishops precisely *because *THE WORD (Jesus, through the Holy Spirit) guides them (not so much the Pope as an individual) and protects them from error, as he promised to do. So The Word speaks now through their words - how else do you think he is still with us and still guiding us? Through your thousands of separate churches no two members of whom agree on even the most basic points if you ask them?Some of the canons and traditions of the RCC contradicts Scripture and yet, because your pope says so, you put his words above the Word.