Nancy Pelosi Ditches Catholic Credentials, Can't Say if Jesus Has Right to Life

[juliee]

Nancy Pelosi Ditches Catholic Credentials, Can’t Say if Jesus Has Right to Life

Washington, DC – Nancy Pelosi further ditched her Catholic credentials again as she was unable to answer a reporter’s question about whether Jesus Christ should have had his right to life protected from conception.

LifeNews.com/nat6607.html

 

[JackVk]

Interviewer:“When did Jesus have the right to life?”
Pelosi:“Umm, umm, no comment.”

Pro-life cause proven right once again

 

[Carlan]

Nancy Pelosi Ditches Catholic Credentials, Can’t Say if Jesus Has Right to Life

Washington, DC – Nancy Pelosi further ditched her Catholic credentials again as she was unable to answer a reporter’s question about whether Jesus Christ should have had his right to life protected from conception.

LifeNews.com/nat6607.html

She was probably taken aback by being bated with such a question.
what would have been more appropriate, and would have rec’d an immediate reply, may have been to as.ask her if all of her six children had a right to their life.
Carlan

 

[gamewell45]

Nancy Pelosi Ditches Catholic Credentials, Can’t Say if Jesus Has Right to Life

Washington, DC – Nancy Pelosi further ditched her Catholic credentials again as she was unable to answer a reporter’s question about whether Jesus Christ should have had his right to life protected from conception.

LifeNews.com/nat6607.html

Out of curiosity, just what are “Catholic Credentials”??

 

[gamewell45]

She was probably taken aback by being bated with such a question.
what would have been more appropriate, and would have rec’d an immediate reply, may have been to as.ask her if all of her six children had a right to their life.
Carlan

I am speculating when I say this, but she most likely felt it was no one’s business but her own.

 

[qui_est_ce]

Out of curiosity, just what are “Catholic Credentials”??

Thou shalt not kill.

 

[Aboveallbereal]

There is subjective opinion and objective fact.

Ms. Pelosi apparently believes in God and Christ but rejects the teaching magisterium of the Church. Thus due largely to accident of birth she is a nominal catholic but is a de facto protestant Christian accepting Christ ( apparently) but rejecting the magisterium.

Quite why there is so much time spent agonising about Protestants who for some personal reasons self define as Catholic is beyond me. Nancy Pelosi is not a Catholic. She is a protestant without the honestly or self knowledge to accept that truth and publicly disown a Church she rejects.

 

[Carlan]

There is subjective opinion and objective fact.

Ms. Pelosi apparently believes in God and Christ but rejects the teaching magisterium of the Church. Thus due largely to accident of birth she is a nominal catholic but is a de facto protestant Christian accepting Christ ( apparently) but rejecting the magisterium.

Quite why there is so much time spent agonising about Protestants who for some personal reasons self define as Catholic is beyond me. Nancy Pelosi is not a Catholic. She is a protestant without the honestly or self knowledge to accept that truth and publicly disown a Church she rejects.

Ms Pelosi,is a Catholic, as far as you and I as members of the public can determine.
She does, from all accounts, appear to be a Catholic dissident,but still, that is not for us to judge. We do not kneel beside her or any one else in the confessional only the Priest in Persona Christe.
Peace, Carlan

 

[Newbie2]

There is subjective opinion and objective fact.

Ms. Pelosi apparently believes in God and Christ but rejects the teaching magisterium of the Church. Thus due largely to accident of birth she is a nominal catholic but is a de facto protestant Christian accepting Christ ( apparently) but rejecting the magisterium.

Nancy Pelosi is not a Catholic. She is a protestant without the honestly or self knowledge to accept that truth and publicly disown a Church she rejects.

:clapping:

Ms Pelosi,is a Catholic, as far as you and I as members of the public can determine.
She does, from all accounts, appear to be a Catholic dissident,but still, that is not for us to judge. We do not kneel beside her or any one else in the confessional only the Priest in Persona Christe.
Peace, Carlan

Confession requires true repentance and attempts at conversion. Her continued public support of abortion and deliberate public misrepresentation of Church teachings does not indicate any such thing.

My bad, perhaps, but I would not kneel next to her at mass, I’d find somewhere else to sit. That woman’s attitude toward the public, the unborn and the Church literally sickens me.

In any case, I will continue to pray for public officials who don’t “get” the Gospel message.

 

[Edward_H]

We need to pray more…and for more miracles. I am praying for a great conversion in her heart before she meets her maker.

 

[Rence]

Nancy Pelosi Ditches Catholic Credentials, Can’t Say if Jesus Has Right to Life

Washington, DC – Nancy Pelosi further ditched her Catholic credentials again as she was unable to answer a reporter’s question about whether Jesus Christ should have had his right to life protected from conception.

LifeNews.com/nat6607.html

Of course she was “unable to answer”, she was probably taken by surprise and knew she was simply being bated. What does Jesus’ right to life have to do with abortion? Nothing. Why? Because: Mary consented to conceive Jesus and knew she wanted to have him. Abortions done to day are done for various reasons, not one of them being that God Himself asked them to bear the Savior of the world. They were also not Immaculately Conceived, as Mary WAS Immaculately Conceived.

Nancy Pelosi was voted in office and has a responsibility to vote according to what her voters want, and she does. If you want Nancy Pelosi to vote differently, evangelize her supporters and those who voted her in.

 

[Newbie2]

Of course she was “unable to answer”, she was probably taken by surprise and knew she was simply being bated. What does Jesus’ right to life have to do with abortion? Nothing. Why? Because: Mary consented to conceive Jesus and knew she wanted to have him. Abortions done to day are done for various reasons, not one of them being that God Himself asked them to bear the Savior of the world. They were also not Immaculately Conceived, as Mary WAS Immaculately Conceived.

Nancy Pelosi was voted in office and has a responsibility to vote according to what her voters want, and she does. If you want Nancy Pelosi to vote differently, evangelize her supporters and those who voted her in.

Yes, it was a leading question, baiting if you prefer. The point of the question was to point out that everyone has the right to life, the wanted and the unwanted.

Catholic politicians have a duty to their God before their duty to the people who elect them. I believe it was JPII that put that on paper. Since Senators and Representitives from other parts of the country affect all of us, we have every right to let her and others know how we feel.

 

[Rence]

Yes, it was a leading question, baiting if you prefer. The point of the question was to point out that everyone has the right to life, the wanted and the unwanted.

Catholic politicians have a duty to their God before their duty to the people who elect them. I believe it was JPII that put that on paper. Since Senators and Representitives from other parts of the country affect all of us, we have every right to let her and others know how we feel.

If Muslim or Jewish or Protesant politicians felt that they had a duty to their religion before their duty to the people, imagine the ramifications. Since Senators and Representatives from other parts of the country affect all of us, we SHOULD let them know how we feel and we should expect them to do something about it. However, our Senators and Representatives have a duty and responsibility to those who elected them, to actually do their job and represent the voters who elected them. I sure don’t want my rights dictated to me by someone of the Muslim faith based on his or her religious beliefs, and I’m quite sure many feel the same way about politicians of the Catholic faith. This country is not a Catholic country, but a melting pot of those with different religions, and even no religion.

 

[Carlan]

If Muslim or Jewish or Protesant politicians felt that they had a duty to their religion before their duty to the people, imagine the ramifications. Since Senators and Representatives from other parts of the country affect all of us, we SHOULD let them know how we feel and we should expect them to do something about it. However, our Senators and Representatives have a duty and responsibility to those who elected them, to actually do their job and represent the voters who elected them. I sure don’t want my rights dictated to me by someone of the Muslim faith based on his or her religious beliefs, and I’m quite sure many feel the same way about politicians of the Catholic faith. This country is not a Catholic country, but a melting pot of those with different religions, and even no religion.

Oh

OH! if only all of us would simply put our common sense to work, concerning the beliefs of a diverse population and the Government officials who represent them.Peace , Carlan

 

[Aboveallbereal]

Ms Pelosi,is a Catholic, as far as you and I as members of the public can determine.
She does, from all accounts, appear to be a Catholic dissident,but still, that is not for us to judge. We do not kneel beside her or any one else in the confessional only the Priest in Persona Christe.
Peace, Carlan

Actions speak louder than words Carlan.

Ms. Pelosi by her actions represents herself as a Christian who explicitly rejects the magisterium on the matter of the sacredness of life. Thus she is objectively a Protestant protesting both belief and the superiority of her own conscience over the teaching of the Church.

In eras when the Church had more self confidence and wasn’t bending over backwards to accomodate humanism she would have been excommunicated for publically bringing scandal to the Church which is what she does by continuing to be a member of a Church she explicitly and actively reviles.

She is not a “catholic dissident” whatever that wooly meaningless oxymoron may mean. She is a cradle catholic de facto Protestant.

 

[the_phoenix]

Ms. Pelosi by her actions represents herself as a Christian who explicitly rejects the magisterium on the matter of the sacredness of life. Thus she is objectively a Protestant protesting both belief and the superiority of her own conscience over the teaching of the Church.

How exactly ought Ms. Pelosi to be defined as a Christian, as in a follower of Christ?
She sure does Protest, like a Protestant, by her attitude the teachings of the Catholic Church.
That said, how is it at all Christian for her to be unable to answer, or to be “taken aback” by,
the question as to whether and when Jesus had the right to life?

Wouldn’t you think a CHRIST-ian would think Christ deserved the right to life,
and even be able to communicate such without being taken aback?

 

[Aboveallbereal]

How exactly ought Ms. Pelosi to be defined as a Christian, as in a follower of Christ?
She sure does Protest, like a Protestant, by her attitude the teachings of the Catholic Church.
That said, how is it at all Christian for her to be unable to answer, or to be “taken aback” by,
the question as to whether and when Jesus had the right to life?

Wouldn’t you think a CHRIST-ian would think Christ deserved the right to life,
and even be able to communicate such without being taken aback?

One can deduce from evidence Phoenix that in truth the lady, in common with most soi disant catholic Democrats, is in truth a liberal humanist prepared to entertain the possibility of Christian truth but unprepared to allow that possibility impact on her real true liberal humanist worldview. Christianity a nice iea but not to be entertained when its demands clash with the morms and moeurs of liberal humanism.

This is the likely truth of her position if we can deduce anything from evidence of actions.

 

[the_phoenix]

One can deduce from evidence Phoenix that in truth the lady, in common with most soi disant catholic Democrats, is in truth a liberal humanist prepared to entertain the possibility of Christian truth but unprepared to allow that possibility impact on her real true liberal humanist worldview. Christianity a nice iea but not to be entertained when its demands clash with the morms and moeurs of liberal humanism.

This is the likely truth of her position if we can deduce anything from evidence of actions.

Thanks for clarifying your views. I think such clarification is much needed these days. As are prayers for Nancy Pelosi’s salvation … (and hey, adding in a prayer or three for my salvation wouldn’t hurt either).

Nice meeting you, Aboveallbereal.

 

[DOShea]

Nancy Pelosi was voted in office and has a responsibility to vote according to what her voters want, and she does. If you want Nancy Pelosi to vote differently, evangelize her supporters and those who voted her in.

Not so about responsibility to vote according to what her voters want. Suppose they decided slavery was a good idea… should Nancy vote in favor of it? How about the freedom to murder already born children where no one questions the validity of their protection under the law? Voters can want things that are not good, which is why our Founding Fathers went to such great pains to stress the value of morality, and placed the source of that morality beyond man, who would otherwise feel free to legislate it or rewrite it. You can see what we have today in a society that not only refuses to value morals, but mocks anyone who does as though they are stone-age people trying to harness fire. And a day doesn’t go by when some aspect of this isn’t legislated by our government, the effect being public law moves further and further away from anyone’s sense of morality.

If this legal relativism is good, then why obey any laws? Why not just accept that some don’t like them, and use Nancy’s philosophy that every man is his own nation, his own supreme court, his own Savior?

 

[beehumble]

Of course she was “unable to answer”, she was probably taken by surprise and knew she was simply being bated. What does Jesus’ right to life have to do with abortion? Nothing. Why? Because: Mary consented to conceive Jesus and knew she wanted to have him. Abortions done to day are done for various reasons, not one of them being that God Himself asked them to bear the Savior of the world. They were also not Immaculately Conceived, as Mary WAS Immaculately Conceived.

Nancy Pelosi was voted in office and has a responsibility to vote according to what her voters want, and she does. If you want Nancy Pelosi to vote differently, evangelize her supporters and those who voted her in.

Nobody has the repsonsibility to vote for evil even if that is what her voters want (I’d love to hear an elected official try that one on God, and it reminds me so much of the Nazi concentration camp guards’ saying ‘I was just doing my job and following orders as I tortured and killed these innocent Jewish children.’ At Auschwitz they have a room of gassed toddlers’ clothes - piled from floor to ceiling. Other rooms with such clothes were long cleaned out but they kept one as a reminder. It is pure evil.)

Abortion is from Satan - it is intrinsically evil (i.e no good can ever come from it). Anyone who supports abortion in any way is working on behalf of Satan. Where Pelosi ends up, whether she repents or has repented or not etc is between her and God. But her past positions in full support of abortion were definitely sinful and evil. She is one of the reasons the Vatican warned that the US Democrat party was in danger of becoming the party of death. Any Catholic Democrats reading this, I’m sorry but your party left you a long time ago. You have to choose party or Church, since the party has plank in support of abortion (not to mention gay marriage, another evil from Satan).

Many abortions are done out of greed and selfishness - not wanting to sacrifice career and money so just ‘abort’ (i.e. kill) him or her. To support abortion for political expediency - i.e to win votes - is an evil of an altogether higher kind (if there could be such a thing) that takes one right into Lucifer’s den in a chair sitting alongside him.

Jesus said to love our enemies in which He meant pray for our enemies. So we need to pray for her and all in support of abortion that they see the light before it is too late for them.

God bless you.