P
PaulinVA
Guest
Luckily we do not yet live in Trumpistan.
- Status
R
redal
Guest
And, you also speak for Progressives…Wow,!
M
Maximus1
Guest
Ever notice there was always a window for people to get out of Russia, or Tibet, or Germany, and they failed to see they were already there and didn’t recognise it.
M
Maximus1
Guest
Their opinions require they conduct exhaustive conversations with imaginary progressives
D
dvdjs
Guest
This pretty much sums up conservative talk radio and social media.
H
Horton
Guest
As though the Dems have a chance in November
The Dems couldn’t even count votes in Iowa, how in the world can they win an election? With Mayor Pete and Bernie Sanders as the front runners, Trump has it made.And please don’t start with conspiracy theories of foreign interference in elections by Trump & team. We all know it’s the radical left wing liberals who play dirty.
R
RuthAnne
Guest
Trump was tried before the senate and found “not guilty”. In November he will be tried before the People and will again be found “not guilty”. Get used to it. He’s going to be around until 2025.
M
Maximus1
Guest
Found not guilty?
Why would his winning an election mean that?
Is Putin found not guilty when he wins?
Why would his winning an election mean that?
Is Putin found not guilty when he wins?
R
redal
Guest
Parties don’t count votes in the General Election, so your point is, well, pointless!
H
Horton
Guest
Did you not comprehend what I wrote? Where in my statement did I say the dems count votes in the general election. I very specifically stated they couldn’t count votes in IOWA.
So that makes you point pointless.
D
dvdjs
Guest
What you said was"
You juxtaposed the idea that state party had difficulties counting votes in Iowa, to the prospects of the “Dems” winning the national election in November. But it is seem to be more of a non sequitur than a logical link.
Yes. Schiff and his cronies decided Bolton and Giuliani and Mulvaney were not needed.
If the prosecution decides not to call witnesses, why should the defendant?
So did the House. Again, all Schiff had to do was call the witnesses he wanted, subpoena them, then follow the normal adjudication procedures. He didn’t.
Look at the statements by progressives here. Draw your own conclusions.JonNC:
And, you also speak for Progressives…Wow,!
R
redal
Guest
No…it was uncomprehendable.
R
redal
Guest
Jon, concluding the statements by those you perceive as progressives here as reflecting the real progressive movement would be like me taking the opinions here of even those who proclaim to be conservatives as the authoritative voice of American conservatism.
P
ProVobis
Guest
You may have a point there. It took them over a month to count all the Clinton votes. There were that many.
Last edited:
H
Horton
Guest
So now you think you are intelligent enough to know what I meant in a comment I wrote? WOW!
I really shouldn’t have to explain this but I will, then you can have your last word. And please never tell me what I am thinking again.
In this part I make the claim that Democratic party officials could not count the vote in Iowa.
In this part I make the statement they could not manage to win an election. Stay with me now, here is where you keep getting confused…it is an if/then type statement. The not being able to count votes in Iowa indicates a level of incompetence. Being incompetent in Iowa indicates they very well will be incompetent in other areas, such as managing to win an election.
D
dvdjs
Guest
Not at all. I saw and summarized what you wrote, and noted what I thought when I read it. I did not say anything about what you thought.
I appropriate your explanation, but do not see what the competence of Iowa party officials in counting caucus votes has to do with the competence to win a national election. Different people involved.
Last edited:
P
ProVobis
Guest
Wait till they get to Florida.
- Status