P
philipmarus
Guest
I was reading Seattle Catholic in which a link directed me to a “list” of Catholics disciplined during Pontificate of Pope John Paul II on the National Catholic Reporter:
(ncronline.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2005a/022505/022505h.php
The list reads like Martyology Report. While there I stumbled upon
NCR Home Page a “Blueprint for Vatican III”. I knew the NCR was Cafeteria Catholicism but I had no idea their dissent was this extreme. I could not believe some of this
Here:
natcath.org/NCR_Online/archives/050302/050302a.htm
Highlights of the NCR’s Blueprint for Vatican III
It means opening all church offices to women. It means shifting the weight of power away from Rome and church pulpits to the people of God. It means getting rid of all parent-child terminology like “Father” (Holy and otherwise), and attendant behaviors.
*The church’s position on contraception is untenable. *
The church does not understand marriage, let alone the complicated cultural, psychological and spiritual conditions that make a marriage no longer viable.
We must search for a coherent and persuasive moral stance on sexual morality: marriage and its support systems, family planning, reconciliation after divorce, homosexual activity, natural law.
Respondents wanted the widest possible participation of all the church in the next council, laity – single and married – and women religious and priests present as a group in proportion to the number of bishops present. A cardinal in a developing country wrote that all religions should be invited “and have the right to vote.”
Well, I bet all this never happens*.* Anyways the last one above (about the Cardinal from Developing world) sounds like something out of the Book of Revalations.
(ncronline.org/NCR_Online/archives2/2005a/022505/022505h.php
The list reads like Martyology Report. While there I stumbled upon
NCR Home Page a “Blueprint for Vatican III”. I knew the NCR was Cafeteria Catholicism but I had no idea their dissent was this extreme. I could not believe some of this
Here:
natcath.org/NCR_Online/archives/050302/050302a.htm
Highlights of the NCR’s Blueprint for Vatican III
It means opening all church offices to women. It means shifting the weight of power away from Rome and church pulpits to the people of God. It means getting rid of all parent-child terminology like “Father” (Holy and otherwise), and attendant behaviors.
*The church’s position on contraception is untenable. *
The church does not understand marriage, let alone the complicated cultural, psychological and spiritual conditions that make a marriage no longer viable.
We must search for a coherent and persuasive moral stance on sexual morality: marriage and its support systems, family planning, reconciliation after divorce, homosexual activity, natural law.
Respondents wanted the widest possible participation of all the church in the next council, laity – single and married – and women religious and priests present as a group in proportion to the number of bishops present. A cardinal in a developing country wrote that all religions should be invited “and have the right to vote.”
Well, I bet all this never happens*.* Anyways the last one above (about the Cardinal from Developing world) sounds like something out of the Book of Revalations.
