A
okNo. I said, “Neo-con to me…” not “Neo-cons are…”
Sounds good.How about:
Avoid categorizing people by a term which could be considered derogatory (e.g., Nazi or neocon) unless they have embraced that title. In which case, you may qualify them with the term as long as you preface it with the word “avowed.” Posters are asked to use their best judgement when posting articles using such terms.
Will that work?
Or Left and Right and we are not French!Sounds good.
And - We’re still free to refer to each other as “conservative” or “liberal” two equally pejorative terms.
Conservative and liberal are both equally accepted terms to describe political ideologies. Granted they could be used in a perjorative sense, so I recommend that everyone follow the forum rules and play nice. I would recommend that we follow one of the conduct rules and not abbreviate it, thus using the word Neo-conservative. Typing it out may result in a decrease in the opportunism to use it as a slander.Sounds good.
And - We’re still free to refer to each other as “conservative” or “liberal” two equally pejorative terms.![]()
French? you know Freedom fries = French friesOr Left and Right and we are not French!![]()
I think that as long as it is taken as a slur it should be avoided. There are many other words or phrases we can use to get our point through to others. Why take the chance of offending someone needlessly?I have read the wikipedia entry. I feel that the pejorative tone associated with ‘neocon’ is simply the sneer attached when addressing people who follow neocon political philosophy: the same sneer attached to the legitimate term ‘libertarian.’ The sneer is not going to go away simply by forbidding the use of the term ‘neocon.’
If neocon in and of itself meant something disrespectful then I would be more hardline about forbidding the use of the term. But it has no such intrinsic meaning. If a decision is made to forbid the term then what are we going to call ourselves/them? The new right? Nouveaux conservateurs? It ends up being six of one and half a dozen of the other imho.
Perhaps the problem also lies in the overfamiliar abbreviation of ‘neo-conservative.’ But we have already had that out. That is already a rule and has only to be applied.
I am not aware of the indirect slur against Jews. I would like to know more about that because, if this is the case, I am definitely against using ‘neocon.’ I think the test is whether the term can be used legitimately or is always a slur.
IMHO this is the best way to handle it. Just as we do not let other abbreviations just ban this one. Then the intent is clear.Conservative and liberal are both equally accepted terms to describe political ideologies. Granted they could be used in a perjorative sense, so I recommend that everyone follow the forum rules and play nice. I would recommend that we follow one of the conduct rules and not abbreviate it, thus using the word Neo-conservative. Typing it out may result in a decrease in the opportunism to use it as a slander.
Like what? What precise term can you offer to replace ‘neocon’?I think that as long as it is taken as a slur it should be avoided. There are many other words or phrases we can use to get our point through to others. Why take the chance of offending someone needlessly?
‘Avowed’ neocon works for me. And ‘avowed neo-conservative’ works even better for me. Indeed having to type it out may have us avoiding it altogether. Now if only we could find very long words for other suspect terminology!How about:
Avoid categorizing people by a term which could be considered derogatory (e.g., Nazi or neocon) unless they have embraced that title. In which case, you may qualify them with the term as long as you preface it with the word “avowed.” Posters are asked to use their best judgement when posting articles using such terms.
Will that work?
Ani Ibi said:‘Avowed’ neocon works for me. And ‘avowed neo-conservative’ works even better for me. Indeed having to type it out may have us avoiding it altogether. Now if only we could find very long words for other suspect terminology!
neo- // comb. form
1 new, modern.
2 a new or revived form of.
[Greek from neos ‘new’]
Sounds like a contradiction in terms to me, bit like:conservative // adj. & n.
adj.
1 a averse to rapid change. b (of views, taste, etc.) moderate; avoiding extremes (conservative in his dress).
2 (of an estimate etc.) purposely low; moderate, cautious.
3 (Conservative) of or characteristic of Conservatives or the Conservative Party.
4 tending to conserve.
That’s Fidel Castro before he was excommunicatedAth-Cath (Atheistic Catholic)
I wonder what happened to:I do not agree that the description “feminazi” should not be applied to those women who further the evil of abortion.
The Nazis not only operated death/concentration camps, they engineered abortion and mutilation of God’s babies. What is partial birth abortion? How do you identify those women who use “nice” political power to demand this evil continue as a “good thing”.
Maybe the term hurts somebody’s feelings? Oh, thats not “nice”.
Should their efforts be respected? If a woman is able to openly expound on her view that an abortion or murder of a baby that is fully able to sustain life is “her right” then she is identifying herself as a Nazi imitator.
Does identifying a woman as a feminazi cause people to run to her aid and comfort her? May they all trip and fall!

I think that Clinton would call herself a feminist. But I do not think Clinton would call herself a Nazi. And therein lies the rub.I do not agree that the description “feminazi” should not be applied to those women who further the evil of abortion.