J
josephdavid
Guest
Interesting report:
epinet.org/issuebriefs/222/ib222.pdf
epinet.org/issuebriefs/222/ib222.pdf
I can’t speak for society. I’m confident another government program or increased spending is not the answer to the problem.So what as society are going to do about it?
Good.yes to an extent I can agree.
Lazy? Hmmm. Ineffective and slowed down by bueracratics? I can agree with that.The problem is the Government is getting lazy.
When was this?Before it was generous to the poor
That’s one solution. I prefer that solution to the federal government.So the excuse is “give up” stop spending on it and let the states do it.
I don’t know of a single state government that has ever said, “we have enough money”.The problem is the State needs the money and the other problem is no one is planning do really doing it.
Which is why I feel poverty issues are always better dealt with locally.The poor has to rely on few charities that are basically bankrupt in most cases.
Doesn’t sound fatalistic to me. From where I sit it reads like a desire for socialism–which I respectfully reject as a valid solution to anything.Sorry to sound so fatalistic. But regardless it needs to be a collective effort of both Government and the individual. After all the Government is a collection of individuals representing the indivual and the whole society.
Socialism as a whol hearted solution? No I do not buy into that either but a mixture of capatilism and socialism may be good.From where I sit it reads like a desire for socialism–which I respectfully reject as a valid solution to anything.
Any portion of a bad thing is never a good thingSocialism as a whol hearted solution? No I do not buy into that either but a mixture of capatilism and socialism may be good.
A little of socialism can keep the few in check to benifit the entire society.
In practice, a little socialism keeps the many in check to benefit the few.Socialism as a whol hearted solution? No I do not buy into that either but a mixture of capatilism and socialism may be good.
A little of socialism can keep the few in check to benifit the entire society.
The problem is so big that it can not be effectively dealt with at a local level. It takes the government to organize and get things done. All socialism is not bad. Nor is laissez faire capitalism a good thing. It amazes me how many people had rather people go hungry and homeless than benefit from any program that might have a bit of socialism in them. The poor loose out and the suffering increases, but, hey, they can comfort themselves by knowing that they don’t live in a soicialist society.yes to an extent I can agree. The problem is the Government is getting lazy. Before it was generous to the poor but wiht poor planning. So the excuse is “give up” stop spending on it and let the states do it. The problem is the State needs the money and the other problem is no one is planning do really doing it.
The poor has to rely on few charities that are basically bankrupt in most cases.
Sorry to sound so fatalistic. But regardless it needs to be a collective effort of both Government and the individual. After all the Government is a collection of individuals representing the indivual and the whole society.
I have a cousin who lives in eastern KY, up in the mountains. There is no industry there. The one small manufacturing plant where she has worked for years (at minimum wage) will be closing soon and moving to Mexico - so even those low paying jobs will be gone. As long as they can get it done cheaper somewhere else, they will. Thus the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. When enough people in this country loose their jobs, their pensions and their health care they might wake up. Until then most people just have tunnel vision - which is sad because with this system all but the wealthy will eventually lose.We are pretty much on same page which is encouraging in my view.
As for apprentiships? I work in manufacturing (both as engineer and management). There is virtually no apprentiships and little investment in manufacturing. The manufactures who are thriving in U.S. you find investment in productivity and training. The ones who just ship things off to China do not.
People need to get their heads out of the sand. How willl they feel about social programs when it’s them or a loved one who needs the program? This could easily happen. You lose your job or your health care and can’t find another job at all or only one with low pay and no benefits. How do you pay your mortgage? Will you lose your house? What if you get sick? People who don’t need help need to realize that it is only by the grace of God that they are not the ones on the street.Why do we Americans always wait until something bites our 6 before we react?
We see the problem but we ignore it because either it takes away from entertainment or it costs money.
Lose what?Until then most people just have tunnel vision - which is sad because with this system all but the wealthy will eventually lose.
Lose their gains. You see life is a circle. How you treat people will eventually come back to haunt/reward you. Both here on earth and in front of Our Father.Lose what?
What gains?Lose their gains.
Really? Is this in the CCC?You see life is a circle.
I agree completely. This is why we tend to treat people better than we treat ourselves and don’t expect the government to do it for usHow you treat people will eventually come back to haunt/reward you. Both here on earth and in front of Our Father.
explotation of workers? That one always kills me. I know of 4 people personally, who started with WalMart as hourly workers 10+ years ago who are now store managers and district managers. I was married to one of them so I have 1st hand experience of how Wal-Mart generally treats their employees in Ohio, Kentucky, WV, VA, NC and SC.With regards to earthly cycles. Look at Wal Mart. Their greed and exploitatioin of workers is beginning to haunt them.