New denomination: Passion for Truth Ministries

  • Thread starter Thread starter MBinSTL
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

MBinSTL

Guest
I’m curious whether any other forum participants have encountered a new and growing “denomination” called Passion for Truth Ministries?

About a month ago, a Catholic friend of mine (I’m Catholic too) saw an advertisement for an upcoming big conference PFTM would be holding at a conference center in downtown St. Louis (where we both live). Registration was free, so we decided to attend, listen, ask questions, poke around, etc. We began researching their materials online and learned a lot at the conference too, which was held last weekend. It turns out the group is headquarter in the greater St. Louis area, but this is the first year they’ve held their annual conference in town. ]

What we found was very interesting. The founder is an ex-Catholic turned Evangelical Protestant more than two decades ago, and having encountered the early Church Fathers in his own deeper studies a few years ago, rather than it being a motivation for him to return home, it launched him on a path of creating a new religious movement, though it retains a number of Protestant distinctives. He’s attracted a lot of interest from individuals participating in a variety of other movements-denominations, but most especially Messianic Judaism (in an overt way) and Seventh Day Adventism (this connection is not overt, but cross-referenced Google searches and some off-the-cuff conversations indicate strong connections). Many of these folks are now helping him to lead the movement, write its materials, give presentations, etc.

Essentially, this group rejects the early Church Fathers as a corruption of the apostolic Christian Faith by way of their introduction of Greek philosophy and a disdain for Jewishness (that’s the claim, anyway). They even make rumblings, though not stated quite as strongly as this hellenization-corruption hypothesis, that the Greek manuscripts of the New Testament are a corruption and that Christians need to somehow recover or re-construct the Aramaic and Hebrew “originals” of the New Testament. They see this early hellenization as principally responsible for all the so-called corruption that follows (sacraments, indulgences, etc.), and they understand historically that things only began to get turned around at the time of the Reformation in the 16th Century. But it’s only now, in the present century, that a true restoration of biblical Christianity is set to begin, and they’re going to lead it!

What are the elements of this so-called restoration? Basically, Christians need to become much more attuned to their Jewish roots: observing the Sabbath and not Sunday, studying the Torah and the Talmud and other Jewish texts and theology, shedding all influence of Greek philosophical-cultural thought from A.D. 90+. It’s a bit of a “judaizing” movement, though that’s not perhaps the best way to describe it.

The interesting thing, is that of the dozens of “joiners” we talked to one-on-one at the conference, we met only one person who wasn’t an ex-Catholic or soon-to-be ex-Catholic – and these folks were from all over the USA. So there is something about this group’s message that is ringing a bell with post-V2 Catholics. As it’s in our own backyard, the little group of amateur apologists I hang around with is going to try to meet this “challenge” head on and see if we can’t engage in what we’ll aim to be charitable, friendly but frank dialogue with leadership of PFTM.

We need though to come up with an apologetic that goes to the heart of the hypotheses and “first principles” on which this movement is built. Unfortunately, the typical maneuver of appealing to the witness of the early Church Fathers is a non-starter as they reject those writings outright as a corrupted form of Christianity. 😦

So we’ll need a different approach… Your ideas and insights are most welcome! 😃
 
How about start with Paul and Hebrews? You didn’t mention it, but how do they feel about circumcision, by the way?
 
Please tell me they are not dispensationalists/pre-trib rapturists. :bighanky:
 
How about start with Paul and Hebrews? You didn’t mention it, but how do they feel about circumcision, by the way?
Great point! I say, get 'em drunk and they’ll admit that they’re working toward it!

The bottom line is that, once you reject the authority given by Christ to His Church, and seek to be lead by the ego, the door is wide open. This group appears to simply be an amalgam, or collection (perhaps the result of static cling) of various and disparate protestant groups to emulate the reconstitution and reunification (ex: Anglican reunion) evident in the Catholic Church. Its very existence is made possible by the entropic nature of non-Catholic Christianity, since it consists of incredulous members from all manner of denominations.

Just watch: they will soon splinter. It’s entropy.
 
I’m curious whether any other forum participants have encountered a new and growing “denomination” called Passion for Truth Ministries?
At first, before I saw the word “denomination,” my first thought was maybe it was a ministry to support the “servant of truth” aspect of Benedict XVI. Oops! My mistake!:o
But it’s only now, in the present century, that a true restoration of biblical Christianity is set to begin, and they’re going to lead it!
As did Luther, Joseph Smith, et al. . . .:rolleyes: Wonder what they have to say about this from Matthew 16:
*15
He said to them, “But who do you say that I am?”
16
Simon Peter said in reply, “You are the Messiah, the Son of the living God.”
17
Jesus said to him in reply, “Blessed are you, Simon son of Jonah. For flesh and blood has not revealed this to you, but my heavenly Father.
18
And so I say to you, you are Peter, and upon this rock I will build my church, and the gates of the netherworld shall not prevail against it.
19
I will give you the keys to the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven; and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.” *

and Matthew 28 -
18:
* Then Jesus approached and said to them, "All power in heaven and on earth has been given to me.
19
Go, therefore, and make disciples of all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the holy Spirit,
20
teaching them to observe all that I have commanded you. And behold, I am with you always, until the end of the age."*
The interesting thing, is that of the dozens of “joiners” we talked to one-on-one at the conference, we met only one person who wasn’t an ex-Catholic or soon-to-be ex-Catholic
😦 Sigh . . . why am I not surprised?
We need though to come up with an apologetic that goes to the heart of the hypotheses and “first principles” on which this movement is built. Unfortunately, the typical maneuver of appealing to the witness of the early Church Fathers is a non-starter as they reject those writings outright as a corrupted form of Christianity. 😦

So we’ll need a different approach… Your ideas and insights are most welcome! 😃
Always up for a challenge! :knight1::knight2:

Forgive my goofy comments here and there in the above;). On a serious note, my first apologetic instinct would be to read good Catholic books about our Jewish roots - to find the spot in time where these folks claim some sort of divergence or break occurred, and go from there.
 
MBinSTL I think you highlight the good reasons why us catholics not knowledgeable enough in our faith should not get involved in ‘other denominations’.

For us to represent the Catholic Church (and that is what I presume you and your friend were doing there) we need to know about our own faith.The Apologetics we have right here at CAF such names as Jimmy Akin and Karl Keating (the founder of CAF) go and debate on Radio Shows and TV shows because they have good knowledge of our faith.

It becomes dangerous when us ‘not so knowledgeable’ catholics embark on debate or visit other denominations as we do not have the knowledge. So my advice to you would be study your own faith more, read some of the apologetics works Jimmy Akin has writtten many books,one that comes to mind is his report on Mormons.He explains it really well.
In the end our lack of understanding of our own faith is what draws us away to other denominations,like this so called leader of this new denomination.The lesson for us all is to learn our own faith
see quote below…I know it is about mormons but it is relevant to this ‘new denomination’ you mention

[With all the talk in the media about Mormonism, more and more people are curious about Mormonism and are visiting Mormon web sites.

But these web sites are deceptive. They do not explain the true beliefs of Mormonism. They try to convince readers that Mormonism is a Christian faith—in fact, the true Christian faith!

As one Mormon web site put it, “Mormonism is the religion most consistent with biblical Christianity. We do not apologize for our beliefs. The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints is the only true Christian church on the face of the earth.”

The problem is … people fall for it—especially Catholics.

In fact, Mormons count Catholics as their main target.

Over half of the current converts to Mormonism are Catholics.

Mormons target Catholics who don’t know their faith.

Sadly, that’s the majority of our fellow Catholics. They’ve been nearly defenseless against Mormon propaganda.

Until now.

With our new special report on Mormonism, we can “inoculate” Catholics from the half-truths and skewed history presented by Mormon missionaries.

By getting this report into the hands of Catholics all across America, we can bolster the faith of Catholics and keep them from leaving the Church.]

It is available right here at CAF

www.catholic.com/projects/mormonism.asp -

God bless
 
This may not be topic-related specifically, but, to be honest, I am hurt, almost physically, when I hear of someone leaving the Faith.

In regard to the question, since they are “Judaizing”, reach them like you would the Jewish. I found some decent sources from the Fathers of Mercy, about a quarter of the way down under the heading of ‘Jewish Roots of Catholicism & Outreach to Jews)’ fathersofmercy.com/links/catholic_links.
 
This may not be topic-related specifically, but, to be honest, I am hurt, almost physically, when I hear of someone leaving the Faith.
Me, too.😦 I even kind of freak when someone hints at it.:eek: I have had to learn to remain calm…:o
In regard to the question, since they are “Judaizing”, reach them like you would the Jewish. I found some decent sources from the Fathers of Mercy, about a quarter of the way down under the heading of ‘Jewish Roots of Catholicism & Outreach to Jews)’ fathersofmercy.com/links/catholic_links.
There’s this book from Ignatius Press called Salvation Is From the Jews that is on my to-read list. That may be helpful, also research about “Messianic Christianity” denominations and groups, which are becoming popular. IMO, I think we would do well as Catholics to know our Jewish roots and appreciate them, and if done properly, this would add richness to our appreciation of Catholicism without causing us to want to leave it or anything.🙂

After all, one of the great spiritual battles in contemporary society is the Judeo-Christian tradition against neo-paganism.

And who can forget Pope John Paul II’s visit to the Wailing Wall in Jerusalem?
 
Perhaps you should contact the archdiocese and inquire about bringing Rosalind Moss from CAF to St. Louis for a highly publicized talk. 🙂
 
Perhaps you should contact the archdiocese and inquire about bringing Rosalind Moss from CAF to St. Louis for a highly publicized talk. 🙂
BOOM. Do it. She is awesome. And I’m pretty certain she is now a sister (actually a mother!).

It’s very good of you to want to do some apologetics in this area. My initial reaction was to be angry at their arrogance, but that doesn’t save any souls.😦 We need good charitable apologists. You are in my rosary prayers tonight.

God bless!
 
How about start with Paul and Hebrews? You didn’t mention it, but how do they feel about circumcision, by the way?
This, in a nutshell, is how PFT is approaching the New Testament:

(1) Try to reconstruct the NT text in question into Aramaic and/or Hebrew.
(2) Refer to the Hebrew Torah and Tanakh and gather all the information from those OT sources that might bear on the particular NT text, e.g. with respect to word usage and meanings and concepts in Jewish theology and culture, possibly looking to the Talmud as well.
(3) Use the information gathered in (1) and (2) as an interpretive key to the NT text in question.

The resulting interpretation is what they consider to be a reliable understanding of the NT scriptures. If it matches up with what other post-apostolic Christians have said or written, great; if not, then it goes to show (so they think) where and how the hellenized Christians departed from their Jewish roots.

As to the finer points of Jewish ritual observance, my impression is that they don’t think those things (like circumcision) are necessarily binding on their Gentile members (per Acts of the Apostles). On the other hand, they think certain things are immutable, such as the observance of Shabbat (over and against the Sunday worship of hellenized Christians).
 
Please tell me they are not dispensationalists/pre-trib rapturists. :bighanky:
No, so far I have not gotten the impression that they are dispensationalists (quite the opposite, in fact) nor that they believe in “the Rapture” as such.
 
Great point! I say, get 'em drunk and they’ll admit that they’re working toward it!

The bottom line is that, once you reject the authority given by Christ to His Church, and seek to be lead by the ego, the door is wide open. This group appears to simply be an amalgam, or collection (perhaps the result of static cling) of various and disparate protestant groups to emulate the reconstitution …
Your insights are correct, I think. The nature of authoritative interpretation of the apostolic teaching – namely, who has that authority and what are the marks of that authority – is a key point on which PFT seems to be glossing over some real and difficult problems.

The leadership of PFT has “inherited” from its Protestant-theological roots the concept of sola scriptura, and that principle is at work in full-force in how they decide on all manner of doctrinal issues. This is something that my friend brought up in his discussion with PFT leadership and I think his dialogue with them on that point is still ongoing.
 
…On a serious note, my first apologetic instinct would be to read good Catholic books about our Jewish roots - to find the spot in time where these folks claim some sort of divergence or break occurred, and go from there.
This is a good suggestion, and it’s already one of the avenues my apologist friends and I are pursuing.

We’ve found this to be a good starting point:

The Mystery of Israel and the Church: online lecture series, printed books.
 
MBinSTL I think you highlight the good reasons why us catholics not knowledgeable enough in our faith should not get involved in ‘other denominations’.

For us to represent the Catholic Church (and that is what I presume you and your friend were doing there) we need to know about our own faith.The Apologetics we have right here at CAF such names as Jimmy Akin and Karl Keating (the founder of CAF) go and debate on Radio Shows and TV shows because they have good knowledge of our faith.
You make an excellent point, and I would encourage all the readers here to carefully consider your advice.

In my case and that of my amateur apologist friends, we’ve all got about 10 years worth of self-study of Catholic apologetics, Sacred Scripture, Catechism, history, theology, etc. One member of our group even has a master’s degree in Catholic theology. So we’re on fairly solid ground in terms of our Faith.

Perhaps even more importantly, we all try to keep up strong prayer lives rooted in the Sacraments and devotion to Christ in the Blessed Eucharist, and to his Blessed Mother. Without those things, well, it would probably all be an exercise in futility and very dangerous to our souls. 😃
 
Perhaps you should contact the archdiocese and inquire about bringing Rosalind Moss from CAF to St. Louis for a highly publicized talk. 🙂
Good suggestion. Actually, Sister Rosalind Moss currently lives in St. Louis (that’s where I live)! She was hoping to get her new religious order of sisters underway here in this archdiocese, but it didn’t work out and she’ll be moving on. You can read about that here: Advent/Christmas 2010 - Newsletter - Daughters of Mary, Mother of Our Hope.

In any case, the Association of Hebrew Catholics has been holding annual conferences (at which Sister Rosalind usually speaks), the most recent one was in October 2010 here in St. Louis. In talking to the leaders of PFT, we mentioned the AHC and hopefully they’ll look into it, and perhaps even attend their next conference with open hearts and minds. Please pray for that!
 
Your insights are correct, I think. The nature of authoritative interpretation of the apostolic teaching – namely, who has that authority and what are the marks of that authority – is a key point on which PFT seems to be glossing over some real and difficult problems.

The leadership of PFT has “inherited” from its Protestant-theological roots the concept of sola scriptura, and that principle is at work in full-force in how they decide on all manner of doctrinal issues. This is something that my friend brought up in his discussion with PFT leadership and I think his dialogue with them on that point is still ongoing.
This movement, as with all other “bible” movements, is destined to instability, division and ultimate failure, lacking a true foundation. It is safe to say that all sola scripturists believe that the bible is a foundation. Logic dictates that the bible is not a foundation, since it is not a living source which can be turned to with certainty on questions of either faith or morals. It can be interpreted to mean nearly anything. The truth it represents is a good foundation, but that truth needs a living authority to interpret it. Of course, that authority resides only in one Church - which bible Christians obstinately refuse to explore.

As a principle, “bible Christianity” is not of God, but of man, who rejected the authoririty which God in Christ placed in His one Church, replacing it with the internal authority of the self. Jesus did not found “bible” anything. He founded a Church, which persists, just as He promised. He gave authority to His Church, and it is the early Church’s members, acting under that same authority who then produced scripture. Thus, the scripture has no authority of it own, but reflects the authority bestowed upon its authors by Christ. It does not exist as a basis, but as a vital component of the whole of the Church. Sola scriptura sects are, to a greater or lesser extent, victims of their founder’s egos, which lead them away from the authority of the Church that Christ founded. Theological entropy followed.

Does PFT seriously think that the “original” Greek and Aramaic texts still exist? Not even Saint Jerome had access to them, relying on copies of copies and translations. Thus, this is yet another man-made attempt to reverse engineer Christianity into something that they can live with - something whose primary requirements are that it be the truth, but not Catholic. I cannot wish them luck in that regard. I pray that they ultimately are lead to the truth, as Dr. Scott Hahn and Dr. Francis Beckwith reasoned for themselves.
 
MB in STL makes a good statement—going back to Jewish roots. Have you ever heard about the doctoral thesis that a guy named something like Samuel Bacceochi did for graduation in Rome?
He was a Seventh Day Adventist and got a Papal medal for it. He traced thru the Vatican records to show when Rome changed from Saturday to Sunday. I understand he was the only such ever allowed enrollment. He died a few years ago.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top