Sounds that way notice they didn’t give any examples just “It’s bad!”Again they criticize a book I bet they haven’t read. Like the whole Harry Potter thing.
The “Twilight” books were written by a Mormon. The previous most popular vampire series, “Interview With The Vampire,” was written by a Catholic (Anne Rice.)Again they criticize a book I bet they haven’t read. Like the whole Harry Potter thing.
Yeah, seems to me that the biggest lesson from the movie is that werewolves don’t wear shirts, but only denim cut offs.The “Twilight” books were written by a Mormon. The previous most popular vampire series, “Interview With The Vampire,” was written by a Catholic (Anne Rice.)
All of the major characters in “Twilight” are, apparently, virgins. Which I don’t think accounts for the terrible review the movies get: rather, I think they really are turkeys despite the intricacies of the plot. Who wants to see a bunch of bare-chested guys running around the wilderness? They’re “chick flicks” for 12-year old girls. And their mothers.
It is bad. No its worse than that… Its lame. Lame beyond belief.A lame book written by a lame writer who had to steal lame ideas from another lame book. If i was rich. I would bu y the rights to the movies/books. And do a cross over. Blade v twilight. Although it wouild be a short movie/book. Cause wesley snipes would kill all those posers in about ten minutes. One more gripe about these pathetic movies. With all the money the first movie raked in. You think they would do a better job with the werewolves. Honestly i’ve seen more believable werewolves from those old black n white werewolf movies of the 30’s.Sounds that way notice they didn’t give any examples just “It’s bad!”
I’ve heard that the majority of the audience is female.They’re “chick flicks” for 12-year old girls. And their mothers.
Um, I believe the picture at the top was from the MOVIE and the review was the MOVIE.Again they criticize a book I bet they haven’t read. Like the whole Harry Potter thing.
Good question.Why is it that fans of this book are so defensive that they automatically assume that this review was done without the materials being viewed? A little too defensive I think.
They could make werewolves not wearing denim cutoffs but it would be censured, ya think?Yeah, seems to me that the biggest lesson from the movie is that werewolves don’t wear shirts, but only denim cut offs.![]()
Kind of like how you’re criticizing an article you clearly haven’t read? :tsktsk: This review is about the film New Moon, not the book on which it was based.Again they criticize a book I bet they haven’t read. Like the whole Harry Potter thing.
Cool!One monsignor is the whole Vatican now? I love how the press gets one quote and makes a whole story around it. The same article says the Catholic church condemned Halloween as anti-Christian. It making the church look like a bunch of fundamentalists.![]()
Very well, I also admit I have not seen the movie, and I don’t think the whole Edward watching Bella is in there, but still, Vampires are still “good” and chaste werewolves are still running around without shirts for middleschoolers. How is this a morale Catholic movie?Kind of like how you’re criticizing an article you clearly haven’t read? :tsktsk: This review is about the film New Moon, not the book on which it was based.
Because the report was very vague about what was wrong with it. Saying it has occult vampires just isn’t enough. I mean consider Gandalf in Lord of the Rings he was a wizard, then have other characters, themes and beliefs straight out of Celtic and Germanic Paganism.Why is it that fans of this book are so defensive that they automatically assume that this review was done without the materials being viewed? A little too defensive I think. And the report was specific about occult characters, vampires.
The Vampires are in Voltari Italy not the Vatican.It does have vampires who live in the vatican… but there’s no sex in it, it’s a really innocent movie. This isn’t going to make me not see it, its only a film…