THE lesson of the Fr. Marcel Maciel / Legionaries debacle was that you can’t judge a man’s holiness by what he says or by what his followers say or do.
The allegations against Fr. Corapi are not Insufficient Holiness. Only on CAF can one be formally prosecuted or informally persecuted for Insufficient Holiness in the limited perceptions of those who have Insufficient Knowledge of the state of anyone else’s soul, including that of a priest who led a rather unconventional life and did not pretend to live otherwise. (Said that monastic life --although appealing in some respects-- was not for him, said that he did not have the calling to,
nor the virtue for, parish ministry, etc.) He should not be condemned for being allowed to live this rather unconventional ministry by his very Order which is now his accuser.
I am not impatient with concerns that people have; I am a little impatient with those who privately transformed him into something he never pretended to be, and are now joining condemning voices because (surprise!) he has turned out not to meet their fantasies in terms of poverty (for example). Look, if I were upset with/troubled by his dying his beard etc., then I actually wouldn’t watch/listen to such a person because it would distract me from the message. So I appreciate that for some that struck an off-chord, perhaps, but again he is not being formally charged with Vanity. My gosh, I could name a few priests & bishops who have far outdone him in vanity, but naturally I won’t.
I really think that for many, this does have to do with perspective. I am not shocked by priests who appear to be more worldly than some, more vain than some, more independent than some. If the Roman Catholic Church ordained him, and sustained him in a maverick lifestyle, that was the choice of the church and the Order, and they should have, and should now, take responsibility for that level of previous allowance of theirs, and/or neglect to supervise, correct, and disallow.