Brumano,
John Corapi joined the SOLT of his own free will. He agreed to be obedient to that order. He has not been obedient. The statement from SOLT is just the documentation of his disobedience. Or what they know at this point of his disobedience.
Well I don’t claim to know but neither does anyone else except of course Fr. Corapi and certain SOLT members if there was or was not at the time of Fr.'s entrance into their Prelature or over the course of time, discussion of any special conditions regarding the nature of Fr’s vocation or other unique considerations, which I’m sure any individual brings to any religious community, which may have resulted in a mutually agreed; adjustment, maybe we could call it, of certain community regulations in his case.
There are certain facts that figure into this charge of disobedience as to whether it is now or will remain a valid charge, okay? Fact: Fr Corapi lived as he did outside of the community houses while satisfying whatever requirements his community superiors allowed and either formally or tacitly agreed to cicumstantially over the course of what is now around twenty five years I think, you know that’s a long time in our short lives don’t you think, and that twenty fives years of this arrangement means something, it establishes something does’nt it ? This constitutes an agreement of some type, no matter who does or does not wish to recognize it, that’s why I call it a fact; because it already has taken place. So if at this point in time one party to that existing agreement wishes to make claim and demand compliance to some item of that entire existing agreement which they have for whatever reason not made demand on for 25yrs. it isn’t automatically the other party’s wrong doing if they appeal to a higher authority for a ruling prior to complying or if under the circumstances they wish to terminate the agreement in total.
This does not make Fr. guilty of anything; including disobedience.