It goes without saying, of course

(we’re getting a refill on that tomorrow hopefully)
An extreme case, it is. But at what point is “within reason”?
- Say she isn’t pregnant, but still has vomiting and migraines. Is this within reason?If I was in this situation and my DH wanted some…(not that he would in this condition), I’d flat out tell him…you’ve got to be kidding me!
- Say it’s just migraines. Is this within reason?Migranes are real…may mother had them and would pass out at the drop of a hat. If I had one, too bad, so sad.
- Say it’s severe cramps. Is this within reason?I haven’t had severe cramps for the last 21 yrs. Amazing what a hysterectomy can do to alleviate that. However, when I did have severe cramps, the answer would be, no.
I suppose what I’m getting at is as men we’ve had to exercise self-control and respect towards women throughout our lives being single. I don’t think it’s appropriate to change that once you get married by demanding the “debt” be paid unless it is through mutual consent.
Mutual consent is the best sex, period.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying if a woman isn’t receptive that a husband can’t try to ply the romance (apparently women like romance) to…scratch the itch. But there are times when a women says no, she means no and as men we should suck it up, exercise some self-control and fight our issues.
A married couple made vows forsaking all others…that still holds true. My advice, it’s gets better after a woman turns 40…45 better and after 50…well…wow.
Romance doesn’t hurt…my DH and I would take mini vacations alone when the kids were school-age and up through high school.
And under no circumstances should a man physically force himself upon a woman, wife or no, who says no and with no consent from her. I’m assuming everyone can be agreed on that one.