T
thrasher59
Guest
No, they weren’t wearing hats. Veils are proper for Mass.
Ah. Things are becoming clearer now.If you are comfortable with the abominations of Vatican II, have fun.
Maybe I´m just naive but having in mind how humbling Confession is, I don´t believe most people would go through that without intending to do better.Why?
It’s reasonable for the priest to try to help him in this way.
Well, you’re not the priest. It might be better if you don’t assume that whatever the priest does for you should be done for all. Priests are trained on these matters, including how to really help people who are trying to escape sinful habits. Sometimes people need and even want that kind of help.So, I don´t see the need for testing the penitents´ sorrow for their sins.
That’s not consistent with what canon law says about delaying absolution.Kima:![]()
Well, you’re not the priest. It might be better if you don’t assume that whatever the priest does for you should be done for all. Priests are trained on these matters, including how to really help people who are trying to escape sinful habits. Sometimes people need and even want that kind of help.So, I don´t see the need for testing the penitents´ sorrow for their sins.
Once again, are you a priest? And even if you’re a priest, are you the priest in this situation?That’s not what canon law says about delaying absolution.
I won’t repeat the citation.
Indeed. Speck meet plank.And since head coverings are not required, perhaps best not to be criticizing the women who are not wearing them —but who are showing up for Mass.
allows you take Communion unworthily
If that’s the case, then the Church disagrees with you, as She has declared these to be admissible.I’m not going to argue, but if you approve of altar girls, eucharistic ministers, Communion in the hand, etc., then I TOTALLY disagree.