E
estesbob
Guest
Well for once I missed youI WALKED AWAY AND LOOK What HAPPENED
OK PEOPLE the topic police is back–
Let us get back to the Eucharist.![]()
Well for once I missed youI WALKED AWAY AND LOOK What HAPPENED
OK PEOPLE the topic police is back–
Let us get back to the Eucharist.![]()
I debated with him before but like the Pharisees my words falls on deaf ears. So he will not listen. Dave Armstrong was right concerning Protestant Apologists like believers. They just refuse to listen to our understanding of Scripture particularly the Real Presence, which I think is the Key for Christian Unity.Good luck getting believers to buy your explanation, Manny. I’ll refer you to this thread, if you have the time and patience for it.
AWE Im hurt you only missed me onceWell for once I missed you![]()
You are forgiven. It is so easy to get derailed. All it takes is one comment. It is sooooo hard to ignore it and move past itALLFORHIM, please accept my apology for contributing to this derailment!![]()
We bring out the “best” in each other.AWE Im hurt you only missed me once
Am I that annoying![]()
![]()
LOLWe bring out the “best” in each other.![]()
Bravo!Jesus = Living Bread (John 6:51)
Living Bread = Flesh (John 6:51)
Flesh = Meat (John 6:55)
Meat = work of God (John 4:34) Already explained.
Work of God = believe on Jesus (John 6:28-29)
Believe on Jesus = have everlasting life (Jhn 6:40) Everlasting life is the result of eating his flesh.
Living Bread = NOT AS YOUR FATHERS DID EAT MANNA, AND ARE DEAD (John 6:58)
The bible can indeed be used to prove any predetermined theology, can’t it?
Using this same formula, an atheist could use the bible to prove his atheism:
God = Word (John 1:1)
Word = flesh (John 1:14)
Flesh = no avail (John 6:63)
Therefore, God is of no avail.
I echo the words of the Ethiopian eunuch, who said to Philip when asked by him if he understood the scriptures that he was reading, “How can I, unless someone guides me?” Acts 8:31
No, not everyone has the authority to interpret scripture.
I have learned to place my trust in Jesus Christ and His church, which is “the pillar and foundation of truth” (I Timothy 3:15)
Let’s reproof this shall weBravo!
I was looking for something just like this to illustrate the ABSOLUTE ABSURDITY of the previously posted syllogism.
Well done! :clapping:
The flesh which Jesus spoke in John 6:63 is not his own. It is the flesh of man. He did not say, My flesh profiteth nothing. He said, “the flesh profiteth nothing.”Let’s reproof this shall we
God = Word (John 1:1)
Word = flesh (John 1:14)
Flesh = no avail (John 6:63)
Therefore, God is of no avail.
Jhn 6:63
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, [they] are spirit, and [they] are life.
Flesh profits nothing because the words are spirit. To believe on Him is spirit and it is life. Jesus explained perfectly as to the meaning of this.
Flesh = Meat (not carnal flesh that profits nothing) = Work of God = Believe on Him = everlasting life
If ‘the flesh’ in general is of no profit, then is the incarnation, life, crucifixion, death, burial and resurrection of Jesus of no profit? After all, these things happened in ‘the flesh,’ and it is quite clear from the context of the New Testament that it had to take place this way.Jhn 6:63
It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, [they] are spirit, and [they] are life.
Flesh profits nothing because the words are spirit. To believe on Him is spirit and it is life. Jesus explained perfectly as to the meaning of this.
It is a fairly common interpretation that I used to hear when I attended evangelical churches, and it completely ignores the entire context of the Bible.The flesh which Jesus spoke in John 6:63 is not his own. It is the flesh of man. He did not say, My flesh profiteth nothing. He said, “the flesh profiteth nothing.”
That is a completely false exegesis. Perhaps, one of the worst interpretation I have ever heard of.
Jesus was saying that the words are spirit. He was referring to spiritual flesh and a spiritual drink. Not the eucharist and not wine.The flesh which Jesus spoke in John 6:63 is not his own. It is the flesh of man. He did not say, My flesh profiteth nothing. He said, “the flesh profiteth nothing.”
That is a completely false exegesis. Perhaps, one of the worst interpretation I have ever heard of.
You ignore everything in red letters and this exercise proves it. Forget that His flesh is meat indeed, forget that his meat is the work of god, forget the believing in him results in everlasting life. Just as Jesus said.It is a fairly common interpretation that I used to hear when I attended evangelical churches, and it completely ignores the entire context of the Bible.
If the flesh truly profits nothing in a general sense, then why did Jesus have to die for our sins? If his flesh profits us nothing, then all Christians are in a hopeless and pitiful state indeed!You ignore everything in red letters and this exercise proves it. Forget that His flesh is meat indeed, forget that his meat is the work of god, forget the believing in him results in everlasting life. Just as Jesus said.
Jesus had to pay for our sins on the cross with His blood for the remission of sins. We are now freed from sin if we turn to Him in faith. Jesus ate His meat by doing the will of the Father. Now, we must eat our meat by believing in Jesus to have everlasting life.If the flesh truly profits nothing in a general sense, then why did Jesus have to die for our sins? If his flesh profits us nothing, then all Christians are in a hopeless and pitiful state indeed!
You then go on saying:God = Word (John 1:1)
Word = flesh (John 1:14)
Flesh = no avail (John 6:63)
Therefore, God is of no avail.
Flesh profits nothing because the words are spirit. To believe on Him is spirit and it is life. Jesus explained perfectly as to the meaning of this.
You then cite John 3:15, John 3:18, 3:36, which has nothing to do with John 6 with Jesus Bread Discourse.Flesh = Meat (not carnal flesh that profits nothing) = Work of God = Believe on Him = everlasting life
No Manny, I didn’t write that. I was reproofing it.believers,
If I were to agree with you, your interpretation brings a lot of erroneous ideas concerning Jesus Christ.
You wrote:
You then go on saying:
You then cite John 3:15, John 3:18, 3:36, which has nothing to do with John 6 with Jesus Bread Discourse.
If you say that Jesus’ own flesh profit nothing, then his Death on the Cross is in vain, and so is our belief in Him.
In John 6:63 it is the spirit that gives life. For one without the spirit, the body is dead. For example, someone is shot in the head, he is dead. His spirit that gave the body to come alive is elsewhere.
Jesus discourse to the 70 disciples is to specifically about His Flesh. His flesh that will be given up for us all so that sins maybe forgiven. So Jesus flesh profit us by redeeming us. He also would remain with us until the end of age. Jesus would substantially present. He may appear to be bread and wine, but his substance is changed. It is not mere bread or wine anything. He is Jesus.
That is why Jesus said, "For my flesh is meat indeed: and my blood is drink indeed. He that eateth my flesh, and drinketh my blood, abideth in me, and I in him (John 6:56-57).