No room for Pro Life Democrats

  • Thread starter Thread starter dmelosi
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Republicans haven’t done much to actually stop abortion, and abortion rates have been lower under Democratic presidents, so I’m not too worried. And the conservative Democrats in the South mostly became Republicans, with exceptions like Byrd.

(I’d consider myself an independent)
 
Yes it has, but now they are saying it loud. They are going further and further to the left.
As long as Catholics and other faithful continue to make lame excuses as well as faux victim hood on the altars of social media and Thanksgiving dinner in order to hype up problems from race to worker’s rights to remain in anti-life parties, then this will only get worse and worse.
 
The Republicans haven’t done much to actually stop abortion, and abortion rates have been lower under Democratic presidents, so I’m not too worried. And the conservative Democrats in the South mostly became Republicans, with exceptions like Byrd.

(I’d consider myself an independent)
You are an independent, but why are you not too worried?

Do you think nominating judges has anything to do with abortion?
Do you think that there would be more or less abortions if there were more restrictions?
Why do you think almost every democrat senate or congressman has a 100% naral rating?
 
As long as Catholics and other faithful continue to make lame excuses as well as faux victim hood on the altars of social media and Thanksgiving dinner in order to hype up problems from race to worker’s rights to remain in anti-life parties, then this will only get worse and worse.
I agree with an exception. Democrats usually have someone test the waters with a statement like Dean made, then follow up with it being part of the platform.

I believe that there will be some Catholic democrats this will drive away.
 
You are an independent, but why are you not too worried?

Do you think nominating judges has anything to do with abortion?
Do you think that there would be more or less abortions if there were more restrictions?
Why do you think almost every democrat senate or congressman has a 100% naral rating?
Not really, since they generally uphold the status quo when it comes to abortion. For anything substantial to happen, we would need either judicial activism or some sort of really good case.
Restrictions don’t happen in a vacuum. Fewer restrictions and better access to birth control and sex ed could result in fewer abortions than the type of restrictions that will not be struck down by the courts combined with bad or no sex ed and worse access to contraceptives. Almost all later term abortions are due to health issues for the mother or baby or women who didn’t realize they were pregnant. I do favor restrictions and holding clinics to high standards if it is to remain legal.
Also, Northern Ireland prohibits abortion and women just travel to England or order dangerous illegal pills. Just making it illegal won’t get rid of it, it will just mean illegal pills and people travelling to Mexico and Canada. Or to other states if it’s only illegal on the state level.
Probably because the party has made being pro choice a litmus test for being nominated.
 
Hasn’t this been true for quite some time though?
I was a born and raised Democrat until it became clear to me abortion on demand was the No. 1 priority, and practically the only thing the party actually stood for. That was some years ago. To that, they have since added gender-bending.

I would imagine most prolife Dems figured it out some time ago, but even here on CAF we still see some people defend the party and claim to be prolife themselves.

I’m not quite as sure the Dem coalition is what Dean thinks it is, though. I think more and more people are figuring out that the Dem party actually stands for nothing at all other than building fake coalitions based on slogans and nothing more.

Possibly even young people will figure out that the slogans are hollow and mean nothing. And if Blacks and Hispanics figure it out in the next few years, I’m not sure even Madison Avenue can keep people from figuring out how hollow it really is.
 
The Republicans haven’t done much to actually stop abortion, and abortion rates have been lower under Democratic presidents, so I’m not too worried. And the conservative Democrats in the South mostly became Republicans, with exceptions like Byrd.

(I’d consider myself an independent)
I left the Dem party, but did not become a Repub or a self-described independent. I’m just me.

But with abortifacient meds and an aging population, a declining surgical abortion rate tells us nothing.
 
Do you think nominating judges has anything to do with abortion?
Abortion became legal by a 7-2 SCOTUS decision with 5 of the 7 being Republican appointees. And for many of the years in the over 4 decades since, Republican appointed judges have held control in the SCOTUS.
 
Abortion became legal by a 7-2 SCOTUS decision with 5 of the 7 being Republican appointees. And for many of the years in the over 4 decades since, Republican appointed judges have held control in the SCOTUS.
So you answer is no that judges make no difference?
 
I was a born and raised Democrat until it became clear to me abortion on demand was the No. 1 priority, and practically the only thing the party actually stood for. That was some years ago. To that, they have since added gender-bending.

I would imagine most prolife Dems figured it out some time ago, but even here on CAF we still see some people defend the party and claim to be prolife themselves.

I’m not quite as sure the Dem coalition is what Dean thinks it is, though. I think more and more people are figuring out that the Dem party actually stands for nothing at all other than building fake coalitions based on slogans and nothing more.

Possibly even young people will figure out that the slogans are hollow and mean nothing. And if Blacks and Hispanics figure it out in the next few years, I’m not sure even Madison Avenue can keep people from figuring out how hollow it really is.
From your perspective, you’d better hope people don’t figure out the Republican Party’s mantra is make the rich even richer with tax cuts as if they aren’t already rich enough while leaving sick people without healthcare coverage.
 
From your perspective, you’d better hope people don’t figure out the Republican Party’s mantra is make the rich even richer with tax cuts as if they aren’t already rich enough while leaving sick people without healthcare coverage.
Do you find it alarming what Dean said and the way the democratic party is headed?
 
I was a born and raised Democrat until it became clear to me abortion on demand was the No. 1 priority, and practically the only thing the party actually stood for. That was some years ago. To that, they have since added gender-bending.

I would imagine most prolife Dems figured it out some time ago, but even here on CAF we still see some people defend the party and claim to be prolife themselves.

I’m not quite as sure the Dem coalition is what Dean thinks it is, though. I think more and more people are figuring out that the Dem party actually stands for nothing at all other than building fake coalitions based on slogans and nothing more.

Possibly even young people will figure out that the slogans are hollow and mean nothing. And if Blacks and Hispanics figure it out in the next few years, I’m not sure even Madison Avenue can keep people from figuring out how hollow it really is.
Either the young will figure it out along with the rest or they will be body-slammed by reality.
 
Do you find it alarming what Dean said and the way the democratic party is headed?
I’m more alarmed by where the Republican Party wants to take America. For instance making the rich richer as if they aren’t already rich enough while not adequately caring for the lives of the sick of those not rich.
 
I’m more alarmed by where the Republican Party wants to take America. For instance making the rich richer as if they aren’t already rich enough while not adequately caring for the lives of the sick.
Well that answers my question.
 
I’m more alarmed by where the Republican Party wants to take America. For instance making the rich richer as if they aren’t already rich enough while not adequately caring for the lives of the sick of those not rich.
That’s what Democrats are doing, and people who are overtaxed to pay for pet projects to make liberals feel good inside don’t always room to spare for charity.
 
That’s what Democrats are doing, and people who are overtaxed to pay for pet projects to make liberals feel good inside don’t always room to spare for charity.
So you must believe the rich aren’t already rich enough and need even more money for charity and supposedly to trickle down upon the masses and you must think charity alone can pay for the medical costs in the 21st century of everyone in need.
 
Do you find it alarming what Dean said and the way the democratic party is headed?
I think a lot of Democrats don’t care as long as they get their special rights and check in the mail from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.

That’s why whenever they are asked what a “fair share” is, how far creeping-sharia or breakdown of sexuality morality goes, they never have a direct answer.

Just look at all the responses…oh, what, living together and playing house? Ok! So-called gay marriage? Why, that’s just two consenting adults!!👍 Making Little Sisters of the Poor pay for condoms?..don’t they just like have to like sign something or whatever/contraception reduces abortions…so yeah…60 genders, well, I guess gender is just discovered after all!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top