N
narrowpath
Guest
You protestants always talk about how catholics dodge the ‘how to be saved’ issue. The problem is that we have different interpretations of this doctine. Many protestants believe that we just need to confess Jesus with our mouths and are then saved forever. The catholic belief is that we need to be baptised with water(funny how protestants always skip that part) and the Spirit (The holy spirit, of course). We need to be in a state of grace at death.Yeh that was actually it. God was able to speak to him through the Scriptures about how to be saved in the way they were in Acts. Notice in Acts where the word ‘saved’ or ‘eternal life’ is used and you will see it was instant. You don’t even like to talk about being saved. I think it is because what is happening in the RCC is NOT what was happening when Peter preached and people were saved. It all made sense to him via God’s word.
I don’t know where you go to church, or what catholic worship you have seen. I can actually agree that we need a real revival of spirit in the Church. But I still will not leave the catholic church, because it is the Church. And he who reject the Church, rejects Jesus, and rejects the Father.“He who listens to you listens to me; he who rejects you rejects me; but he who rejects me rejects him who sent me.” -Luke 10:16
I also don’t think that there are 40,000 holy spirits, one for each protestant denomination to help them interpret the scriptures.
On that note, a question about the scriptures: What did christians do in the 350 years before the New Testament was put together? With texts like the Epistle of Barnabas, the Shepherd of Hermas, and others (they do contain orthodox christian doctrine, btw), and books that would be in the NT being doubted? How did they know what scriptures to be inspired by?