Non-Catholic Exclusion of the Eucharist

  • Thread starter Thread starter always687
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Hey guys. So my boyfriend of one year is a Nondenominational Evangelical Free Christian, and he feels very discriminated against by the Catholic Church because he isn’t allowed to receive Communion. How do I explain to him in a gentle way why he can’t, and convince him he isn’t being “discriminated against”? Nothing I’ve tried has worked. The fact that we believe the Eucharist is the actual body and blood of Christ is irrelevant to him. He thinks that he should be allowed to receive because he’s a Christian. I don’t know what to do or say anymore…
Are you sure you want to be courting a person who is not Catholic? This problem you are having right now is only a tiny glimpse of the troubles you will have if you marry this man and struggle to reconcile religious differences for the rest of your life.
 
Just because they chose to call themselves by a particular name does not reflect in he truth. They really think they are the only Christians to exist. You may know of them they nhave a university at Malibu.
As I said, it’s likely just the ones you’ve know. That’s the thing with Non-Denominational Chrisitians, you have no idea what their beliefs will encompass, what their worship style is, etc… just by the names of their churches. Some are in the Pentacostal tradition, many more are in the Baptist tradition, some are in the reformed tradition, some are something else entirely, or nothing at all. About the only thing that unifies them is they are generally speaking, Christian. But not all identify solely as Christian. Some do identify as non-denominational. Some identify with the faith tradition that their church may have sprung from even if no longer an official part of that tradition. It really does vary. Clearly you’ve run into many non-denoms who don’t think anyone but those in their church or style of church are Christian. But that’s in no way a comprehensive opinion of Non-denominational Christianity.
 
So it would be more universally-accurate to just say that receiving the Catholic Eucharist is an implicit act that one believes everything the Catholic Church teaches, and it’s therefore wrong to do it unless it reflects one’s true beliefs.
Of course, do most Catholics even believe everything the Catholic Church teaches?
 
Of course, do most Catholics even believe everything the Catholic Church teaches?
Yes? At least they’re supposed to.

And a Catholic in a state of mortal sin, which I imagine they’d argue can result in not following the Church’s teachings, is not supposed to receive the Catholic Eucharist any more than a non-Catholic should.
 
Yes? At least they’re supposed to.

And a Catholic in a state of mortal sin, which I imagine they’d argue can result in not following the Church’s teachings, is not supposed to receive the Catholic Eucharist any more than a non-Catholic should.
Can what a Catholic believes (as opposed to what they do), cause them to be in a state of mortal sin? For example, if a Catholic believes that using contraception is OK (just as a matter of personal belief, not as an action on their part), would that cause them to be in a state of mortal sin?
 
That’s why I don’t understand why anyone has an issue with this.
Because some think it a sin to split the Body of Christ, and hence not recognize Him at communion (and hence their philosophy of open communion) which is what they see Paul warning against in Corinthians. The Didache put emphasis on Baptism as the differentiation of who would and would not be allowed to participate in the Eucharist, many feel that is the way it should be now, or else it is a tacit teaching that not all Christians are part of the Body.
 
Can what a Catholic believes (as opposed to what they do), cause them to be in a state of mortal sin? For example, if a Catholic believes that using contraception is OK (just as a matter of personal belief, not as an action on their part), would that cause them to be in a state of mortal sin?
An active Catholic may want to amend what I’m going to say, but if you consider Catholics consider contraception to be a mortal sin. And if you support contraception you’d be supporting a mortal sin. I believe a Catholic would believe that to also be a mortal sin, yes. As such someone who supports contraception shouldn’t be receiving communion.
 
For those of you still struggling on understanding why this is a stumbling block for non- Catholics–

Say hypothetically you were traveling and thus attended Mass at a new parish. When it came time to recieve the Eucharist, you were told that you were not allowed, because you didn’t belong to this parish of “true Catholics”.

That is what it is like as an Evangelical to go to a Catholic Church and be denied the Lord’s Supper.
I am sorry but that doesn’t really clear it up. First off, we don’t need to swipe our Catholic membership card before receiving the Eucharist. So why would we be told we are not allowed? Secondly any parish that would say we are not a part of the “true Catholic” church wouldn’t be part of the Catholic church. Finally, the most important part of the issue is why would you want to receive the Eucharist in the Catholic church, when you don’t believe in the real presence in the Eucharist? Say I came from a very small parish and we all gathered around the altar and received the Eucharist together. Would it be OK for me to walk up beside your church’s leader to receive as I am use to in my church? Of course it wouldn’t it would be disrespectful for me to expect you to bend to my beliefs.

When you are in someone else house you need to respect their rules and their beliefs, even if you don’t agree with them, not change the rules and beliefs to suit your wants and needs.
God Bless
 
Because some think it a sin to split the Body of Christ, and hence not recognize Him at communion (and hence their philosophy of open communion) which is what they see Paul warning against in Corinthians. ** The Didache put emphasis on Baptism as the differentiation of who would and would not be allowed to participate in the Eucharist, many feel that is the way it should be now, or else it is a tacit teaching that not all Christians are part of the Body**.
Well Catholics don’t believe other Christians are full members of Christ’s Church (body). So then by your logic, you can see why they don’t let us non-Catholics participate in the Catholic Eucharist.

We may disagree, consider it insulting, etc… but that’s their position. They view not themselves as cutting us off from the Body of Christ, but rather than we’ve cut ourselves off from the Body of Christ by not being members of what they view as the one true church of Christ on Earth which they view as fully present ONLY in the (Roman) Catholic Church and her Eastern Catholic Churches in communion with Rome.

Any Catholic can feel free to amend or correct anything I’ve said, but that’s my understanding of the crux of the issue based on my own schooling and of course hanging around here too much.
 
Doesn’t mean they don’t exist. My cousin is non-denominational, and describes himself as nondenominational or Christian interchangeably depending on the context.

As a more likely to happen hypothetical, lets say you’re a Catholic or Anglican such as myself, and you travel to visit a Lutheran Church in the Missouri Synod. You would be told you would be unable to receive their communion there (regardless of any restrictions your own faith might have on the matter). And it makes sense when you think about it, you’re not in communion with that church.

That’s why I don’t understand why anyone has an issue with this. It’s not like this is a unique trait of the Catholic Church. Many Christian denominations do not allow anyone but professed members in communion with their church to partake in communion, even among a single faith family. For example a member of the ELCA can’t receive at a LCMS church even though they’re both Lutheran.

To look at it in a more basic way. You don’t walk into someone else’s house you’re visiting and assume you’re going to be invited to stay for dinner. Many faiths will allow you to stay for dinner, or even invite you to specifically to dinner… but not all. You have to respect their wishes in that even if you don’t agree with it. And I’m saying this as a member of a faith with an open communion policy (to any baptized Christian) who much prefers this model. I may not particularly like the closed communion model, but I absolutely understand the reasons behind it and at the very least can respect and abide by it.
The reason that some people, especially the non-denominationals, struggle with this is because we learn of communion as a time for all Christians to come together at the Lord’s Table. It’s quite confusing, especially those who don’t know a ton about the Catholic Church as to why they as baptized Christians would be denied a seat at the table.

It pretty much flies in the face of everything they’ve learned. I my case all I was told is “you’re not Catholic, you’re not allowed”. That can really pull an myriad of reactions from people if they don’t understand. Even when you explain Catholic Communion to some people they still might not get it, or feel dejected, unwelcome, etc… because the closed communion is such a different practice than what they’re used to and really, might be the only thing they know.
Are you sure you want to be courting a person who is not Catholic? This problem you are having right now is only a tiny glimpse of the troubles you will have if you marry this man and struggle to reconcile religious differences for the rest of your life.
When I read stuff like this on here, I really wonder how my marriage has been able to last 13 years. 🤷
 
The reason that some people, especially the non-denominationals, struggle with this is because we learn of communion as a time for all Christians to come together at the Lord’s Table. It’s quite confusing, especially those who don’t know a ton about the Catholic Church as to why they as baptized Christians would be denied a seat at the table.

It pretty much flies in the face of everything they’ve learned. I my case all I was told is “you’re not Catholic, you’re not allowed”. That can really pull an myriad of reactions from people if they don’t understand. Even when you explain Catholic Communion to some people they still might not get it, or feel dejected, unwelcome, etc… because the closed communion is such a different practice than what they’re used to and really, might be the only thing they know.

When I read stuff like this on here, I really wonder how my marriage has been able to last 13 years. 🤷
Suppose that’s fair. But at the same time a little education goes a long way. Catholics are by no means the only denomination who practice closed communion. And frankly Catholicism has more reasons than most of the other Christian denominations to practice a closed communion. And many of those reasons are laid out pretty clearly and gently in the Missal on the very first page. Is it a little jarring to be denied a place at Christ’s table, absolutely. But then if you’re not Catholic you’re clearly a guest in their church, and if for no other reason you have to respect their belief on the matter even if you disagree with their reasons.

And this is by no means a one way street. A Catholic would similarly not go into a non-denominational church and partake in their communion/table service either and knowing that might help a non-denominational Christian a bit better. At it’s core non-Catholic Christians have to understand the Catholic view on their faiths. That none are the fullness of Christianity. We may disagree with them, but it is what it is. They have their belief and as guests in their churches we do well to abide by their position on the matter.
 
I am sorry but that doesn’t really clear it up. First off, we don’t need to swipe our Catholic membership card before receiving the Eucharist. So why would we be told we are not allowed? Secondly any parish that would say we are not a part of the “true Catholic” church wouldn’t be part of the Catholic church.
Ok, thanks for letting me know. I’ll try to clear it up (again, I’m trying to explain the Evangelical viewpoint here so you can better understand it, and then better make yourselves understood).

Recapping my previous post–
Say hypothetically you were traveling and thus attended Mass at a new parish. When it came time to recieve the Eucharist, you were told that you were not allowed, because you didn’t belong to this parish of “true Catholics”. That is what it is like as an Evangelical to go to a Catholic Church and be denied the Lord’s Supper.
The above scenario makes zero sense to the Catholic mind: why in the world would one parish deny communion to other Catholics? Why would their priest stand up and say “Please don’t join us if you belong elsewhere”, or that you’re “not truly Catholic”? Are people whom act this way even really part of the Catholic church?

**None of this makes any sense-- which is exactly the point. **

Evangelicals consider all Christians to be in communion. For them, to be denied the Lord’s Supper at your church makes zero sense, just like it makes zero sense for a Catholic to be denied the Lord’s Supper at a different parish. It’s confusing, hurtful, feels needlessly discriminatory, and cutting off part of the Body of Christ.
Finally, the most important part of the issue is why would you want to receive the Eucharist in the Catholic church, when you don’t believe in the real presence in the Eucharist?
Evangelicals doesn’t view the bread and wine as Christ’s literal body. Rather they view the Lord’s Supper as a joining of all Christians coming to the Lord’s table-- true Christian unity. By excluding them, it feels like you are shunning them from the Christian family.
Say I came from a very small parish and we all gathered around the altar and received the Eucharist together. Would it be OK for me to walk up beside your church’s leader to receive as I am use to in my church?
If you claim to be a Christian at an Evangelical church you are EXPECTED to come and sit besides the church members, even if you are a visitor to this particular congregation. In the Evangelical view, the only reason a person would refuse is because they are not Christian.
When you are in someone else house you need to respect their rules and their beliefs, even if you don’t agree with them, not change the rules and beliefs to suit your wants and needs.
God Bless
I’m not saying that the Evangelical or Catholic view is right. I’m just trying to explain the Evangelical view so that Catholics like the OP can better understand and better explain their view.
 
=Padres1969;13750741]
As a more likely to happen hypothetical, lets say you’re a Catholic or Anglican such as myself, and you travel to visit a Lutheran Church in the Missouri Synod. You would be told you would be unable to receive their communion there (regardless of any restrictions your own faith might have on the matter). And it makes sense when you think about it, you’re not in communion with that church.
Probably, but not necessarily.
That’s why I don’t understand why anyone has an issue with this. It’s not like this is a unique trait of the Catholic Church. Many Christian denominations do not allow anyone but professed members in communion with their church to partake in communion, even among a single faith family. For example a member of the ELCA can’t receive at a LCMS church even though they’re both Lutheran.
Maybe, but not always. I myself was in that position years ago when we moved to where we live now. The only Lutheran Church in the area is Missouri Synod. When we first attended, we spoke with the pastor, and after a brief discussion, he welcomed us to receive.

The point is that the LCMS practices “close” communion, which is not entirely closed communion. there is some leeway that the pastor has when deciding things under certain circumstances. I have seen ELCA members commune, Anglican members commune, even a few Episcopalians :eek: :D.
But the issues are the same: unity of belief, and protecting the souls of those who do not discern the true body and blood.
To look at it in a more basic way. You don’t walk into someone else’s house you’re visiting and assume you’re going to be invited to stay for dinner. Many faiths will allow you to stay for dinner, or even invite you to specifically to dinner… but not all. You have to respect their wishes in that even if you don’t agree with it. And I’m saying this as a member of a faith with an open communion policy (to any baptized Christian) who much prefers this model. I may not particularly like the closed communion model, but I absolutely understand the reasons behind it and at the very least can respect and abide by it.
I think this is the point: when you visit someone’s house you abide by their wishes.

Jon
 
Can what a Catholic believes (as opposed to what they do), cause them to be in a state of mortal sin? For example, if a Catholic believes that using contraception is OK (just as a matter of personal belief, not as an action on their part), would that cause them to be in a state of mortal sin?
Is such a person encouraging others to use contraception and causing confusion/scandal in the Church because of their beliefs?
 
Well Catholics don’t believe other Christians are full members of Christ’s Church (body). So then by your logic, you can see why they don’t let us non-Catholics participate in the Catholic Eucharist.

We may disagree, consider it insulting, etc… but that’s their position. They view not themselves as cutting us off from the Body of Christ, but rather than we’ve cut ourselves off from the Body of Christ by not being members of what they view as the one true church of Christ on Earth which they view as fully present ONLY in the (Roman) Catholic Church and her Eastern Catholic Churches in communion with Rome.
But that’s not what you initially stated about those on “the other side,” you said, “That’s why I don’t understand why anyone has an issue with this.” I explained why some have issues with it.

We all agree on the RCC position, so that’s not in question.
 
Are you sure you want to be courting a person who is not Catholic? This problem you are having right now is only a tiny glimpse of the troubles you will have if you marry this man and struggle to reconcile religious differences for the rest of your life.
When I read stuff like this on here, I really wonder how my marriage has been able to last 13 years. 🤷
👍 🙂 My wife is Catholic and we’ve been married for almost nine years. With God all things are possible, amen! In all honesty, my wife is probably a better Christian then I’ll ever be.

In His Grace
 
Since the topic is CATHOLIC Communion, isn’t it reasonable for the Catholic church to assume they are correct about THEIR OWN belief system?

If I walked into a Baptist church right now and told them they need to start baptizing babies, how do you think that would work out for me?
Considering the series of posts preceding, this is an exceptionally measured and charitable post.

And spot on.

Jon
 
Evangelical and Pentecostal and non denominational Christians don’t believe Christ is truly present in the Eucharist…so why would they want to participate…they also don’t follow the teaching of the Catholic Church…some of who consider the Catholic Church an apostate church…so again…why would they want to participate in the Eucharist…become Catholic and you will be able to
 
Ok, thanks for letting me know. I’ll try to clear it up (again, I’m trying to explain the Evangelical viewpoint here so you can better understand it, and then better make yourselves understood).

Recapping my previous post–

The above scenario makes zero sense to the Catholic mind: why in the world would one parish deny communion to other Catholics? Why would their priest stand up and say “Please don’t join us if you belong elsewhere”, or that you’re “not truly Catholic”? Are people whom act this way even really part of the Catholic church?

**None of this makes any sense-- which is exactly the point. **

Evangelicals consider all Christians to be in communion. For them, to be denied the Lord’s Supper at your church makes zero sense, just like it makes zero sense for a Catholic to be denied the Lord’s Supper at a different parish. It’s confusing, hurtful, feels needlessly discriminatory, and cutting off part of the Body of Christ.

Evangelicals doesn’t view the bread and wine as Christ’s literal body. Rather they view the Lord’s Supper as a joining of all Christians coming to the Lord’s table-- true Christian unity. By excluding them, it feels like you are shunning them from the Christian family.

If you claim to be a Christian at an Evangelical church you are EXPECTED to come and sit besides the church members, even if you are a visitor to this particular congregation. In the Evangelical view, the only reason a person would refuse is because they are not Christian.

I’m not saying that the Evangelical or Catholic view is right. I’m just trying to explain the Evangelical view so that Catholics like the OP can better understand and better explain their view.
Your example is still confusing because you are trying to compare a Catholic being denied at a Catholic Church to an Evangelical being denied at a Catholic Church. Seems like apples and oranges to me.

But I get the point you are trying to get at, which is feelings. I think you summed it all up perfectly by stating that they view it differently and they feel shunned if we don’t use their definition of communion and allow them to partake. However, if We were in their church we would be EXPECTED to follow their rules if the tables were turned.

I appreciate your stand on not taking a side who is correct. I do understand the Evangelical view is not the same as the Catholic’s view. This difference is the reason why we are not “in communion” with the others church. So I would kindly ask what would your advice be on a Catholics explanation to an Exangelical, which would come across as not shunning them?

Thank you.
 
I appreciate your stand on not taking a side who is correct. I do understand the Evangelical view is not the same as the Catholic’s view. This difference is the reason why we are not “in communion” with the others church. So I would kindly ask what would your advice be on a Catholics explanation to an Exangelical, which would come across as not shunning them?
  1. Most important: you must love them. First Corinthians 13:1 is key-- if you have not love you are nothing but sounding brass.
  2. Try to understand them and approach their views respectfully. That doesn’t mean you have to agree with them, but you must be respectful and loving. Seek first to listen, then to speak.
  3. When you get to the actual explaining, bring your Good to the table and leave insults in the trash.
  4. Share with the other person how you believe that the Eucharist is literally the body of Christ and what receiving it means. You want to make your explanation charitable, bringing your Good, and clearly showing the distinction between the different views.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top