Non-Catholic Exclusion of the Eucharist

  • Thread starter Thread starter always687
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Understood! Btw way a holy Good Friday and a most Happy Easter with brightest blessings to you and yours!
To you as well. It’s going to be an amazing Tridium with my formal reception finally happening on Saturday night during the Easter Vigil. We ran through it as a practice run on Wednesday before Tenebrae and it seems like it’s going to be a beautiful service (as was Tenebrae for that matter) with quite a few confirmations, baptisms, and 3 of us being received.
 
To you as well. It’s going to be an amazing Tridium with my formal reception finally happening on Saturday night during the Easter Vigil. We ran through it as a practice run on Wednesday before Tenebrae and it seems like it’s going to be a beautiful service (as was Tenebrae for that matter) with quite a few confirmations, baptisms, and 3 of us being received.
Oh wow! I am somewhat familiar with the process. Congratulations and I will try to keep you in mind in my Sat prayers. And I am sure a very exciting time and beautiful, special Easter it will be for you.
 
But what if someone on vacation attended your parish and was not accustomed to bowing? Memaw noted their pastor has refused Communion to anyone who does not hold their hands properly or does not bow. Would yours do the same to one who stopped by to fulfill their Mass obligation along their travels? Say a Ravens, Bengals or Browns fan perhaps 😉
I already stated it isn’t a strict requirement in my Parish. I can’t really speak for Memaw’s pastor refusing someone based on proper hands. However, I can say no pastor is perfect. Maybe he was having a bad day. 🤷

Just wanted to add, I was at mass in a few parishes in Italy and even though I didn’t speak the language I new exactly what was going on in the mass and wasn’t refused communion.
 
I already stated it isn’t a strict requirement in my Parish. I can’t really speak for Memaw’s pastor refusing someone based on proper hands. However, I can say no pastor is perfect. Maybe he was having a bad day. 🤷

Just wanted to add, I was at mass in a few parishes in Italy and even though I didn’t speak the language I new exactly what was going on in the mass and wasn’t refused communion.
Good for you. And indeed I had forgotten the part about your priest not refusing someone who doesn’t bow. Happy Easter!
 
I looked into it a bit more and I guess bowing in the OF of the Roman Rite was added to the mass last fall (2015)? Along with not returning to your pew to pray after receiving, embracing rather than shaking hands during the peace, and holding your hands up during the our father?

In my admittedly limited experience to Catholic mass since these changes were brought about (don’t know the exact date they were made), acceptance has not been universal at all. I mean heck, acceptance of the last set of changes made to the mass in 2011 has not been universal. I still here “and also with you” at Catholic masses among other things. It would seem an odd thing to deny the Body of Christ to a Catholic who is either unfamiliar with the bowing addition or simply hasn’t memorized it into their long remembered motions during the mass. :confused:

It hardly seems a proper identifier of who is and isn’t Catholic (never mind worthy to receive).
Would be nice if you would get your facts straight. Everyone returns to their pew after receiving, shaking hands at the sign of peace is proper, and holding hands up during the Our Lord’s Prays is NOT in the Rubrics, even tho many Catholics do that. It is just something that got started by individuals and is not actually part of the Mass. I have NO idea why Fr. gave them a Blessing instead of the Host but I do know he must have had a very good reason and they seemed to be OK with it. He may have asked them something, I don’t know. I just know that somehow he knew they shouldn’t receive Communion. A Catholic would know how to receive the Host properly. The changes are proper and if understood properly one would know why. Interesting how non-Catholics seem to know so much and yet so little about the Catholic Faith. God Bless, Memaw
 
I have noticed that our Pastor at times refuses Communion to anyone who does not hold their hands properly or bow. He lays the Host back down and gives them a Blessing instead. I set right in front so I notice. He also talks quite often about the blessing of frequent Confession. God Bless, Memaw
I should make it clear that I am only saying what I think. Maybe they didn’t say Amen, I don’t know He is careful about how hands are held, no “one” handed receiving etc. It hasn’t happened often but he is a Canon Lawyer so I am sure he knows what he is doing. Much more than you or I do. You’d be surprised how some approach Communion. If they are carrying a small child that starts to grab for the Host, he will give them Communion on the tongue instead. God Bless, Memaw
 
I should make it clear that I am only saying what I think. Maybe they didn’t say Amen, I don’t know He is careful about how hands are held, no “one” handed receiving etc. It hasn’t happened often but he is a Canon Lawyer so I am sure he knows what he is doing. Much more than you or I do. You’d be surprised how some approach Communion. If they are carrying a small child that starts to grab for the Host, he will give them Communion on the tongue instead. God Bless, Memaw
Ok. Or maybe they were only asking for a blessing instead of Communion… ?

Would you care to ask him about this?

And I don’t think we should resign ourselves that a priest always is right, because he knows more than us. We all have the Holy Spirit able to guide us. And I don’t mean that in the Protestant way. I mean, we must always seek the Holy Spirit’s guidance in our conscience and understanding. A priest requires our obedience and submission as our pastor, but he can act against the Church and God… he is not immune.
 
Ok. Or maybe they were only asking for a blessing instead of Communion… ?

Would you care to ask him about this?

And I don’t think we should resign ourselves that a priest always is right, because he knows more than us. We all have the Holy Spirit able to guide us. And I don’t mean that in the Protestant way. I mean, we must always seek the Holy Spirit’s guidance in our conscience and understanding. A priest requires our obedience and submission as our pastor, but he can act against the Church and God… he is not immune.
No I won’t ask him, he knows what he is doing. Most Priests are faithful priests and unless I see one doing something very wrong I wouldn’t jump to conclusions. I was just trying to make the point that sometimes priests can and should protect the Sacred Host from abuse. God Bless, Memaw
 
No I won’t ask him, he knows what he is doing. Most Priests are faithful priests and unless I see one doing something very wrong I wouldn’t jump to conclusions. I was just trying to make the point that sometimes priests can and should protect the Sacred Host from abuse. God Bless, Memaw
I was suggesting that you ask him for your own understanding and confirming for those who read this thread. You were the one sharing to others that he witheld Communion from someone for not holding their hands a certain way. This led to people thinking the Church Teaches it’s a mortal sin to hold their hands “the wrong way”.

Now you say you really don’t know why he witheld. But that’s good to know, at least.
 
Would be nice if you would get your facts straight. Everyone returns to their pew after receiving, shaking hands at the sign of peace is proper, and holding hands up during the Our Lord’s Prays is NOT in the Rubrics, even tho many Catholics do that. It is just something that got started by individuals and is not actually part of the Mass. I have NO idea why Fr. gave them a Blessing instead of the Host but I do know he must have had a very good reason and they seemed to be OK with it. He may have asked them something, I don’t know. I just know that somehow he knew they shouldn’t receive Communion. A Catholic would know how to receive the Host properly. The changes are proper and if understood properly one would know why. Interesting how non-Catholics seem to know so much and yet so little about the Catholic Faith. God Bless, Memaw
MeeMaw, I got my facts straight based on the articles I linked to previously. And as we later discussed, it may have been a parish or diocese specific thing.
 
I was suggesting that you ask him for your own understanding and confirming for those who read this thread. You were the one sharing to others that he witheld Communion from someone for not holding their hands a certain way. This led to people thinking the Church Teaches it’s a mortal sin to hold their hands “the wrong way”.

Now you say you really don’t know why he witheld. But that’s good to know, at least.
Any Catholic would know that if you see a priest refuse someone Communion, there MUST be a serious reason. My own understanding is, he knows what he’s doing. I don’t have to question everything I see a priest do. I only shared that so some would know there are legitimate reasons why one could be refused Communion. Also if one is setting in the front pew and see this take place one can only surmise why? How we hold our hand or approach Communion in the Hand can tell a lot about if one knows what they are doing. Or if one does not say Amen or bow. And yes bowing is required now. There are times when he says something to the communicant and they then hold their hands properly and he gives them Communion. I wish all were as careful about it as Fr. is. God Bless, Memaw
 
Would be nice if you would get your facts straight. Everyone returns to their pew after receiving, shaking hands at the sign of peace is proper, and holding hands up during the Our Lord’s Prays is NOT in the Rubrics, even tho many Catholics do that. It is just something that got started by individuals and is not actually part of the Mass. I have NO idea why Fr. gave them a Blessing instead of the Host but I do know he must have had a very good reason and they seemed to be OK with it. He may have asked them something, I don’t know. I just know that somehow he knew they shouldn’t receive Communion. A Catholic would know how to receive the Host properly. The changes are proper and if understood properly one would know why. Interesting how non-Catholics seem to know so much and yet so little about the Catholic Faith. God Bless, Memaw
I’m not certain when the article linked to by Padres was written. It appears 2015 but I am confused because it cites Anthony Pilla, bishop of Cleveland and the first Sun of Advent as Nov 30. But Pilla is a retired Bishop Emeritus of Cleveland and the first Sun of Advent 2015 was the 29th.

In any case apparently according to the article, the changes were implemented in all parishes in the Diocese of Cleveland and it says Catholics are about to experience major changes in the Communion rite as dioceses begin implementing the updated General Instruction of the Roman Missal.

From the article, "Diocesan bishops are now putting in place the changes approved by the Vatican and then by U.S. bishops with adaptations for American culture.’

“Other changes include: Asking worshippers to raise both hands upward at the “Our Father.” In some churches, people have a custom of holding hands during the prayer. The raised arms go back to the way Jesus and early church members prayed, diocesan liturgists said. They are a symbol of surrender to God and Christian belief in Jesus’ victory over death.”

If holding hands upward is not part of the Mass Rubrics, why then are bishops implementing these changes approved by the Vatican. asking their flock to raise both hands upward?
 
I looked into it a bit more and I guess bowing in the OF of the Roman Rite was added to the mass last fall (2015)? Along with not returning to your pew to pray after receiving, embracing rather than shaking hands during the peace, and holding your hands up during the our father?
No it was not added last fall. Here is an article that addresses bowing of the head dated from 2005. I am not sure when it began. I remember we use to genuflect but that was considered to cause people to fall then we were instructed to bow. I haven’t heard of embracing as the sign in the US is shaking hands. As to standing until all have received communion this article addresses that. One should not speculate on what they think they see.
 
Hey guys. So my boyfriend of one year is a Nondenominational Evangelical Free Christian, and he feels very discriminated against by the Catholic Church because he isn’t allowed to receive Communion. How do I explain to him in a gentle way why he can’t, and convince him he isn’t being “discriminated against”? Nothing I’ve tried has worked. The fact that we believe the Eucharist is the actual body and blood of Christ is irrelevant to him. He thinks that he should be allowed to receive because he’s a Christian. I don’t know what to do or say anymore…
Coming from someone who has grown up in the Evangelical world, it’s not something that is easy to understand from that perspective. I think the fact hat most Evangelicals do not see Communion in the same way as Catholics and other apostolic Christians do plays a big factor. He really needs a full immersion into Catholic theology to understand the fundamental importance of the Eucharist in Catholic life, because it really isn’t considered of great importance in Evangelical circles (in fact, my own experience is that Communion has always been taken monthly, in some cases even less frequently).

I think it might help to offer also that not all Catholics will always take Communion during Mass if they haven’t confessed their mortal sins, this might at least help him see that it’s not something that Catholics “do” to non-Catholics. And I would mention that Catholics take seriously the warning from Paul that he might drink judgment upon himself if he partakes in it.

Most of all, he should simply accept that he cannot participate because that is simply Catholic teaching and that he should abstain from it out of respect for you and your faith.
 
Most of all, he should simply accept that he cannot participate because** that is simply Catholic teaching **and that he should abstain from it out of respect for you and your faith.
For clarification it is not a “simply Catholic teaching”. The Eucharist is a divine revelation believed in and practiced since the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

It is a divine revelation revealed by God to the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.

See; Jesus reveal it in all the gospels at the last supper. See 1 Corinthians 5, 10, 11 on how Catholics continue to practice this biblical Apostolic faith in the Eucharist.

The Eucharist is not a Catholic teaching. The Eucharist is the summit of our Apostolic faith in practice. The Eucharist is a divine revelation.

Simply stated as Jesus revealed; Our Catholic Eucharist is for the baptized in full communion with the Saints in heaven on earth in the Eternal New and Everlasting covenant of God, in His body and blood.

Peace be with you
 
The conversation going on here came to mind as I stood last night - mid Vigil - on the steps of our church, listening to the Easter Sermon of St John Chrysostom. It is perhaps one we should all recite each Easter:

"Are there any who are devout lovers of God?
Let them enjoy this beautiful bright festival!

Are there any who are grateful servants?
Let them rejoice and enter into the joy of their Lord!

Are there any weary with fasting?
Let them now receive their wages!

If any have toiled from the first hour,
let them receive their due reward;

If any have come after the third hour,
let him with gratitude join in the Feast!

And he that arrived after the sixth hour,
let him not doubt; for he too shall sustain no loss.

And if any delayed until the ninth hour,
let him not hesitate; but let him come too.

And he who arrived only at the eleventh hour,
let him not be afraid by reason of his delay.

For the Lord is gracious and receives the last even as the first.
He gives rest to him that comes at the eleventh hour,
as well as to him that toiled from the first.

To this one He gives, and upon another He bestows.
He accepts the works as He greets the endeavor.
The deed He honors and the intention He commends.
Let us all enter into the joy of the Lord!

First and last alike receive your reward;
rich and poor, rejoice together!
Sober and slothful, celebrate the day!
You that have kept the fast, and you that have not,
rejoice today for the Table is richly laden!

Feast royally on it, the calf is a fatted one.
Let no one go away hungry. Partake, all, of the cup of faith.
Enjoy all the riches of His goodness!"

Happy Easter, friends.
 
Hey guys. So my boyfriend of one year is a Nondenominational Evangelical Free Christian, and he feels very discriminated against by the Catholic Church because he isn’t allowed to receive Communion. How do I explain to him in a gentle way why he can’t, and convince him he isn’t being “discriminated against”? Nothing I’ve tried has worked. The fact that we believe the Eucharist is the actual body and blood of Christ is irrelevant to him. He thinks that he should be allowed to receive because he’s a Christian. I don’t know what to do or say anymore…
I do not think you can help him much on this. If he felt discriminated because he could not (not allowed) to receive Communion in a Catholic Church, he has valid reason to feel so. Non-Catholics (with exceptions e.g. the Orthodox) are not allowed to receive Communion in a Catholic Church.

Being a Nondenominational Evangelical Free Christian, Catholic mass and specifically its Communion is one of Catholic practices he would disagree with. And it is not going to be the end of it for him.

If you really have to explain to him the Catholic mass, so be it but there is no way that he would agree with you on the mass itself. That is why you are a Catholic and he is not. Watering down the doctrine of the Holy Eucharist so that it is more palatable to non-Catholics is not right. It is what it is. Probably it can be sensitive for both sides, emotion can always find its way in such an important matter such as this, and for that you can be as objective as possible.

The important thing is he gets the correct information on Catholic Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist rather than what he thinks it is. You can emphasize the fact that even Catholics themselves should not receive Communion if they are not practicing or not in a state of grace. He then can take it on from that. Will he disagree with the concept of our Holy Communion? I am sure he does.

Why is it a problem? Is he investigating Catholicism with an intention perhaps to enroll for RCIA?

God bless.
 
For clarification it is not a “simply Catholic teaching”. The Eucharist is a divine revelation believed in and practiced since the resurrection of Jesus Christ.

It is a divine revelation revealed by God to the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church.

See; Jesus reveal it in all the gospels at the last supper. See 1 Corinthians 5, 10, 11 on how Catholics continue to practice this biblical Apostolic faith in the Eucharist.

The Eucharist is not a Catholic teaching. The Eucharist is the summit of our Apostolic faith in practice. The Eucharist is a divine revelation.

Simply stated as Jesus revealed; Our Catholic Eucharist is for the baptized in full communion with the Saints in heaven on earth in the Eternal New and Everlasting covenant of God, in His body and blood.

Peace be with you
I think you’re reading a little more into my post than you should.

An Evangelical is not going to view the Eucharist the way you do, however true it is. My intention in that last sentence is to suggest that the fact that the Church teaches that non-Catholics should not partake of the Eucharist should be reason enough to not do so, out of respect, regardless of whether one believes it or not.

…And with your spirit ;).
 
The conversation going on here came to mind as I stood last night - mid Vigil - on the steps of our church, listening to the Easter Sermon of St John Chrysostom. It is perhaps one we should all recite each Easter:

"Are there any who are devout lovers of God?
Let them enjoy this beautiful bright festival!

Are there any who are grateful servants?
Let them rejoice and enter into the joy of their Lord!

Are there any weary with fasting?
Let them now receive their wages!

If any have toiled from the first hour,
let them receive their due reward;

If any have come after the third hour,
let him with gratitude join in the Feast!

And he that arrived after the sixth hour,
let him not doubt; for he too shall sustain no loss.

And if any delayed until the ninth hour,
let him not hesitate; but let him come too.

And he who arrived only at the eleventh hour,
let him not be afraid by reason of his delay.

For the Lord is gracious and receives the last even as the first.
He gives rest to him that comes at the eleventh hour,
as well as to him that toiled from the first.

To this one He gives, and upon another He bestows.
He accepts the works as He greets the endeavor.
The deed He honors and the intention He commends.
Let us all enter into the joy of the Lord!

First and last alike receive your reward;
rich and poor, rejoice together!
Sober and slothful, celebrate the day!
You that have kept the fast, and you that have not,
rejoice today for the Table is richly laden!

Feast royally on it, the calf is a fatted one.
Let no one go away hungry. Partake, all, of the cup of faith.
Enjoy all the riches of His goodness!"

Happy Easter, friends.
I’ve arrived back to the thread after your post, but hope you enjoyed a Happy Easter, ComplineSanFran! An Easter Sermon of St John Chrysostom full of joy! Brightest blessings!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top