A
Augustus24
Guest
Vatican II was fifty years ago while your statement indicated “various permutations” as if major changes in doctrine occurred regularly and recently.
I will admit we changed some wording in the Mass last year but it was to return to a more faithful translation of the original. No change in doctrine.
I’m anxious to know why you, Augustus24, recent member of CAF believe that you know more than all of the Cardinals and the Pope regarding what Catholic doctrine “should be?”
Why you, who do not claim to be a Catholic think that the Church “needs reform?”
Lisa
Yes it was, and for 50 years those dissenters like the ones I mentioned have been actively ignored or silenced by the powers that be. 50 years is pretty recent in church history reckoning.Vatican II was fifty years ago while your statement indicated “various permutations” as if major changes in doctrine occurred regularly and recently.
Yes, I like the new translation better. But, would you like me to show you were there has been a distinct change in Catholic doctrine?I will admit we changed some wording in the Mass last year but it was to return to a more faithful translation of the original. No change in doctrine.
Yes of course. I think it needs reform because I have seen how Catholic rigidity on these issues have caused undue harm, and damage to people trying to live out the Catholic faith. A discipline or doctrine of the Church should never hurt someone or cause them damage in any way.I’m anxious to know why you, Augustus24, recent member of CAF believe that you know more than all of the Cardinals and the Pope regarding what Catholic doctrine “should be?”
Why you, who do not claim to be a Catholic think that the Church “needs reform?”