M
Mickey
Guest
LOL! Webster’s won’t help you on this one. Martin Luther also tried.We are saved by faith alone…
We are saved by grace, though faith, and our good works are the fruit of that faith.
LOL! Webster’s won’t help you on this one. Martin Luther also tried.We are saved by faith alone…
Actually, no, we are not. Did you know that the only place in the Bible where it says “faith alone” is where it totally refutes this heresy?We are justified and thereby treated as if we were righteous… Cool, huh? We are saved by faith alone…
Merriam Webster
Main Entry: jus·ti·fy
Pronunciation: \ˈjəs-tə-ˌfī\
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): jus·ti·fied; jus·ti·fy·ing
Etymology: Middle English justifien, from Anglo-French or Late Latin; Anglo-French justifier, from Late Latin justificare, from Latin justus
Date: 14th century
transitive verb
1 a: to prove or show to be just, right, or reasonable
b (1): to show to have had a sufficient legal reason (2): to qualify (oneself) as a surety by taking oath to the ownership of sufficient property
2 a archaic: to administer justice to
b archaic: absolve c: to judge, regard, or treat as righteous and worthy of salvation
Sorry Janet. Your version of justification is incorrect.We are justified and thereby treated as if we were righteous… Cool, huh? We are saved by faith alone…
Merriam Webster
Main Entry: jus·ti·fy
Pronunciation: \ˈjəs-tə-ˌfī\
Function: verb
Inflected Form(s): jus·ti·fied; jus·ti·fy·ing
Etymology: Middle English justifien, from Anglo-French or Late Latin; Anglo-French justifier, from Late Latin justificare, from Latin justus
Date: 14th century
transitive verb
1 a: to prove or show to be just, right, or reasonable
b (1): to show to have had a sufficient legal reason (2): to qualify (oneself) as a surety by taking oath to the ownership of sufficient property
2 a archaic: to administer justice to
b archaic: absolve c: to judge, regard, or treat as righteous and worthy of salvation
Most Protestants believe that Christians are justified by faith alone, and generally attribute this teaching to Paul. The obvious problem with this view is that neither Paul nor any other New Testament writer ever says we are justified by faith alone. In fact, Paul uses the word “faith” over two hundred times in the New Testament, and he never qualifies “faith” with the words “alone” or “only.” Since Paul uses uses the word “alone” more than any other New Testament writer, one would think that he would have modified the word “faith” with the qualifier “alone” at least once if he were teaching justification by faith alone. In fact, the only time the phrase “faith alone” (in Greek, pistis monon) occurs in the Scriptures is, as Holly has already mentioned, is when James says, “A man is justified by works and not by faith alone” (James 2:24).I agree. That is why we are saved by faith alone, but towards men this faith is visible in works. They are the physical evidence and the fruit of our faith. They are however not the grounds of our salvation.
Yes… as I said, I can agree to that… The works are the fruits, but we are first saved and then we bring good fruit… without salvation there are no good fruits and good fruits do not bring forth salvation, because they are not good (a bad tree can only bring forth bad fruit)LOL! Webster’s won’t help you on this one. Martin Luther also tried.
We are saved by grace, though faith, and our good works are the fruit of that faith.
I’ll repost my repost… just for you.Actually, no, we are not. Did you know that the only place in the Bible where it says “faith alone” is where it totally refutes this heresy?
(James 2:24 RSV) You see that a man is justified by works and not by faith alone.
In all honesty, I was doing a Yahoo Search on something and this site -CAF- was one of the first few hits on the first page.In reading another thread, I see that some non-Catholics who post here are annoyed at the vigor with which Catholics defend the faith.
I’m wondering, were you surprised (when you first came here) that Catholics defend the faith? Were you surprised that Catholics aren’t really that open to the evangelical efforts of those outside the CC? Did you expect Catholics to be more willing to compromise on doctrine?
first of all i never said you had to accept my view as the truth i dont lnow were you are getting that. the cc teaching to you is the truth and that is fine with me never said anything different. i have accepted the confession but show me were it says in th e bibleto tell a priest your sins it dont say that does it or that you have to tell anyone your sins does it Acts 10:43 he is the one all the prophets testified about saying that everyone who believes in him will their sins forgiven through his nameWhen someone comes here and opposes a CC teaching by quoting scripture, It’s not that supporting a view with scripture is good for us but not for you, it’s that the scripture that’s quoted doesn’t say what you (non-Catholic Christians) believe it does.
And while you are here claiming that we have to accept your view as truth, do you accept that what the CC teaches is the truth? We’re supposed to accept, as a truth, that you have assurance of forgiveness for serious sins by confessing directly to God. Do you accept, as equally true, that you must confess mortal sins in the sacramental Confession?
On truth. There can only be one truth. If it’s red, saying that it’s blue is incorrect. We have opposing views on forgiveness of sins. Can both views be true?
This is all that is meant, here, by “truth”. There is no secret meaning.
The NNC forces Catholics to defend their faith by thinking our beliefs is contrary to the Word of God. It’s a lot of deceptions.In reading another thread, I see that some non-Catholics who post here are annoyed at the vigor with which Catholics defend the faith.
I’m wondering, were you surprised (when you first came here) that Catholics defend the faith? Were you surprised that Catholics aren’t really that open to the evangelical efforts of those outside the CC? Did you expect Catholics to be more willing to compromise on doctrine?
That post have a lot errors and a lot of verses that promote the false MAN-MADE doctrine of faith alone.I’ll repost my repost… just for you.
Read. (including the end)… That helps a lot… I did write about this passage…
Acts 11:26 when he found him he brought him back to Antioch. both of them stayed here with the church for a full year teaching great numbers of people. it was there at Antioch that the believers were first called Christians2000 years—beginning with Jesus Christ—to the apostles—to the bishops and priests.![]()
About 110 AD, in Antioch, the Bishop there by the name of St. Ignatius of Antioch (Disciple of St. John the Apostle) called Christian Church Catholic.Acts 11:26 when he found him he brought him back to Antioch. both of them stayed here with the church for a full year teaching great numbers of people. it was there at Antioch that the believers were first called Christians
Antioch in Pisidia was a Galetian city were Paul preaached, started a church, and was persecuted. To this and mearby chruches, he weote the Bool of Galatians Acts 13 2Timothy 3:11 Antioch in Syria was a major city and early center of Christianity. Jesus’ followers were first called Christians there, and from ther the first foreign missionaries wer sent Acts 11:26, 13:1-4
Chapter 7. Let us stand aloof from such heretics
They abstain from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they confess not the Eucharist to be the flesh of our Saviour Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins, and which the Father, of His goodness, raised up again. Those, therefore, who speak against this gift of God, incur death in the midst of their disputes. But it were better for them to treat it with respect, that they also might rise again. It is fitting, therefore, that you should keep aloof from such persons, and not to speak of them either in private or in public, but to give heed to the prophets, and above all, to the Gospel, in which the passion [of Christ] has been revealed to us, and the resurrection has been fully proved. But avoid all divisions, as the beginning of evils.
Chapter 8. Let nothing be done without the bishop
See that you all follow the bishop, even as Jesus Christ does the Father and the presbytery as you would the apostles; and reverence the deacons, as being the institution of God. Let no man do anything connected with the Church without the bishop. Let that be deemed a proper Eucharist, which is [administered] either by the bishop, or by one to whom he has entrusted it. Wherever the bishop shall appear, there let the multitude [of the people] also be; even as, wherever Jesus Christ is, there is the Catholic Church. It is not lawful without the bishop either to baptize or to celebrate a love-feast; but whatsoever he shall approve of, that is also pleasing to God, so that everything that is done may be secure and valid.
Let me do it for you too…Most Protestants believe that Christians are justified by faith alone, and generally attribute this teaching to Paul. The obvious problem with this view is that neither Paul nor any other New Testament writer ever says we are justified by faith alone. In fact, Paul uses the word “faith” over two hundred times in the New Testament, and he never qualifies “faith” with the words “alone” or “only.” Since Paul uses uses the word “alone” more than any other New Testament writer, one would think that he would have modified the word “faith” with the qualifier “alone” at least once if he were teaching justification by faith alone. In fact, the only time the phrase “faith alone” (in Greek, pistis monon) occurs in the Scriptures is, as Holly has already mentioned, is when James says, “A man is justified by works and not by faith alone” (James 2:24).
rev kevin-No not suprised that they won’t accept my view said:Because there can only be one TRUTH on any specific issue, and Jesus mandated that on all matters of FAITH and Morals, that thee single truth would reside in the ONLY Church that He founded.
Mt. 16: 18 “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."***
Please note the extensive use of “singular terms” I, rock, you, Peter, My, Church are all singular and very specific and clear.
Actually BOTH, because God’s truth is the TRUTH of HIS Catholic Church.I agree that opposing views can’t both be true, but what makes yours the truth and not others. Who’s truth, God’s truth or the catholic church truth?
Sure we can, and have in Mt. 16 above. Why? Because from the time of Christ death and resurrection until about the- mid 1,600’s THEE ONLY Christian Church in existence was thee one we know today as the CC.I have not had one iota of proof that ya’l religion is the true religion. You can’t point to the dogma or the truth but y’all can’t point it out in the bible where it says that the “Catholic religion” is the true religion. I have never seen the word Catholic in the bible I have seen Christian or Christianity which is what I am Christian, but not Catholic why?
The term “Catholic” which means “Universal” did not apply for nearly 200 years while thee Church was in fact becoming universal. We were first called Catholic around the year 150 AD. By the year 325AD, thanks to the Emperor Constantine, who had conquered the entire known world, and through the influence of his mother who was a devout Christian / Catholic and converted her son; he forced the “entire world” to practice Catholicism.
Rev. Kevin; again look at Mt. 16 above. That is you’re God speaking! “I [God] you [Peter] My Church, bind and loose [power of Governance] keys to the kingdom” all specifically from Christ to St. Peter and extremely clear and concise mandates!If it is the true religion it should be there but its not why? I have others point to Israel but still not proof. Who says Catholic is the true religion. I never read in the bible where Jesus, God or anyone else says that the Catholic religion is the true religion.
Sorry Kevin, unless you’re talking to FORMER catholic fallen away priest, I find this extremely hard to believe. I too know priest who claim to be catholic, but are NOT! Catholicism has requirements that many are unwilling to pay the price of admission and the continuing Do’s!I know priests that accept other points of views and they are your leaders and yet a layman won’t, go figure, they will but y’all won’t well who is right there y’all or the priest? I have talked to not just one priest but around 30 to 50 from all over the U.S. and they all accept other points of views.
Mt. 16: “24 Then Jesus told his disciples, "If any man would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. For what will it profit a man, if he gains the whole world and forfeits his life? Or what shall a man give in return for his life?”
And isn’t it interesting that that this message follows only a few verses after Christ Himself founds His ONLY Christian Church?
Love and prayers Kev![]()
Because there can only be one TRUTH on any specific issue, and Jesus mandated that on all matters of FAITH and Morals, that thee single truth would reside in the ONLY Church that He founded.
Don’t say the Catholic church. See below Church
Mt. 16: 18 “And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it. 19 I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."***
Please note the extensive use of “singular terms” I, rock, you, Peter, My, Church are all singular and very specific and clear.
All fine but I, rock, you, Peter don’t mean catholic church It just says church not specific to what church
Church-summoned assembly, congregation. Believers who join together in a cerain location Matthew 18:17, 1Corinthians 4:17. Also means all Christians everywhere, of all ages, of all times 1Corinthians 10:32, Ephesians 1:22-23. In the Bible,Church is not a building. Church is the Christians who inhabit it Romans 16:5. New Teatament picture of the church include the bride of Christ Ephesians 5:25,27. the people of God 1 peter 2:9;-10and the body of Christ Romans 12:5, 1 Corinthians12:12, Ephesians 4:16. In the NT, church members sccepted Jesus Christ as Lord and Savior, pictured this commitment in baptism, agreed to believe in tand behave like Christ, and committed to share Christ an da ministry like His wiht others Matthew 28:19-20, Acts 1:8.
Actually BOTH, because God’s truth is the TRUTH of HIS Catholic Church.
See above Church
Sure we can, and have in Mt. 16 above. Why? Because from the time of Christ death and resurrection until about the- mid 1,600’s THEE ONLY Christian Church in existence was thee one we know today as the CC.
See FORCED below
The term “Catholic” which means “Universal” did not apply for nearly 200 years while thee Church was in fact becoming universal. We were first called Catholic around the year 150 AD. By the year 325AD, thanks to the Emperor Constantine, who had conquered the entire known world, and through the influence of his mother who was a devout Christian / Catholic and converted her son; he forced the “entire world” to practice Catholicism.
So the Catholic church was named by a man and he “forced” the “entire world” to practice catholicism.
FORCED-compell by force, invountary, done or produced with effort, exertion, or pressure.
I notice the word “forced” so inother words your church was “forces” upon the “entire world” {no choice}. So Peter was not the founder of the Catholic church it was “forced” upon the “entire world” by the Emperor Constantine, a mear man.So the argument that the Catholic church was founded since the time of Jesus and the Apostiles 2000 years age is not true. Constantine uses Christianty for political reasons.{I did a little research on him} Thanks to Constantine for “forcing” the religion on the “entire world.” “Forcing” and that is a good thing to “force” the “entire world” even if they didn’t want to be Catholic they were “forced.” Do you like being “forced” to do what you don’t want to do, to have “no choice” to have “no say so” in your religion. Would you accept being “forced” into another religion in todays society. You know having “no choice” you can’t be Catholic anymore because you were “forced” into another religion. And you call this “good.” I believe If you would sing a different tune if you were “forced” to leave the Cahtolic faith and “forced” into another faith. And you have the gull to tell me that your “forced” Catholic faith is
the “true” faith. And you spew that it is the “true” faith founded by Peter the Apostle, man give ne a break, even he wasn’t “forced” to follow Jesus. Jesus didn’t tell him, “you better follow mt or eles” or “I’m forcing you Peter to follow me” You just blew any argument about your faith being the “true faith.” Faith is NOT FORCED on anyone.
Rev. Kevin; again look at Mt. 16 above. That is you’re God speaking! “I [God] you [Peter] My Church, bind and loose [power of Governance] keys to the kingdom” all specifically from Christ to St. Peter and extremely clear and concise mandates!
Sorry Kevin, unless you’re talking to FORMER catholic fallen away priest, I find this extremely hard to believe. I too know priest who claim to be catholic, but are NOT! Catholicism has requirements that many are unwilling to pay the price of admission and the continuing Do’s!
Fraid not they are all practicing priests but at least they accept and listen to other points of views, they may not agree but they accept and listen their views which is more than what goes on here.
Ya maybe they don’t want to be FORCED into the requirements and FORCED to pay the admission and the continuing do’s.
Mt. 16: “24 Then Jesus told his disciples, "If any man would come after me, let him deny himself and take up his cross and follow me. For whoever would save his life will lose it, and whoever loses his life for my sake will find it. For what will it profit a man, if he gains the whole world and forfeits his life? Or what shall a man give in return for his life?”
And isn’t it interesting that that this message follows only a few verses after Christ Himself founds His ONLY Christian Church?
But not by FORCE.
The word FORCED is your words not mine so don’t twist it and say I said it no no no you used the word FORCED NOT ME.
Love and prayers Kev![]()
Read #117Hi Kalt,
I’m a former Catholic. I went to Catholic School and Catechism. My whole family is very, very devoutly Catholic…except me. I began to question the Catholic faith when I started reading the scriptures myself, instead of just hearing them at mass. Forgive me for saying so, but I have come to view being born Catholic kind of like being born Jewish. It is almost more of an ethnicity than a religion. I read that Christ clearly tells us to pray only to the Father. I read that Jesus Christ is "the Way, the Truth and the Light. Nowhere does it say that Mary is our intercessor or that saints can hear or respond to our prayers. If we are to take the word of men over the word of God, then we can easily become confused. I have had as many different answers to my questions as there were priests answering them. The scriptures do not waver…men do. I applaud your faithfulness and your firm defense of your faith. However, having been a Catholic for many years (married in the CC and children baptized in the CC) I also know that many Catholics do not question. They are indoctrinated, if you will. I now consider myself a nondenominational christian and have never had stronger faith in my life than I do now. I ask only that you read the scriptures with an open mind and compare what you read to what you have been taught. It took me years, but my understanding of God has never been more clear than it is now.
You were not born Catholic. You were born into a Catholic family. You were born, like us all, a sinner.Hi Kalt,
but I have come to view being born Catholic kind of like being born Jewish.
Jesus didn’t say this though. He did say, “I am the Way the Truth and the* Life *…”I read that Jesus Christ is "the Way, the Truth and the Light.
Then you will understand why I will not be taking your word on this.If we are to take the word of men over the word of God, then we can easily become confused.
The same could be said of any Protestant denomination.I have had as many different answers to my questions as there were priests answering them.
The same could be said of any Protestant denomination.I also know that many Catholics do not question.
The same could be said of any Protestant denomination.They are indoctrinated
I am glad you have had a deeper conversion. A conversion which God calls everyone to. But instead of looking back on your Catholic upbringing with distaste, why not look at it with favor? Was it the Catholic Church who first introduced you to Christ? Was it the Catholic Church who first introduced you to the Scriptures? Taught you to pray? To love the Lord? To follow the leading of the Holy Spirit?I now consider myself a nondenominational christian and have never had stronger faith in my life than I do now.
And what “indoctrination” have you gone through to believe that those here have not done this?I ask only that you read the scriptures with an open mind and compare what you read to what you have been taught.
I believe St Peter founded the Church there. What is your point?it was there at Antioch that the believers were first called Christians\