Non-Catholics - What does the word "Sacrament" mean to you?

  • Thread starter Thread starter SteveVH
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I understand why Catholicism thinks that each sacrament is necessary. šŸ˜‰

I understand that I don’t understand Divinity. That lack of understanding leads me to question any religion that says they do understand. :lol: I got to the point in my life that the only part of the Creed I could say truthfully was ā€œI believe in Godā€. I couldn’t say the rest.
I didn’t realize you were a former Catholic. Do you remember how many times the term ā€œmysteryā€ was used when speaking about the nature of God? Your statement that you ā€œdon’t understand Divinityā€ is refreshing. Nor do any of us which is why we call God an ā€œincomprehensible mysteryā€. I always get nervous when anyone claims to understand God completely. What we do know has been revealed to us. We know that God is a Trinity of Persons, for instance. We cannot fully understand this but we accept it because it was revealed, not invented. I’ve often said, borrowing from St. Augustine, that to understand God completely is like trying to empty an ocean into a bucket. It just doesn’t work. He has revealed what He wants us to know. The rest is up to faith.
FWIW, I’ve never experienced Divinity (God) as personal (to this point in life, anyway)… Even in my days as a Charismatic Catholic, I never experienced God as personal.
But He has given you the gift of faith which is more valuable than any experience. I hope you will experience God on a personal basis at some point just to be refreshed. My truly personal experiences of God have occurred through the sacrament of Reconciliation (Confession) and Eucharist. No words will suffice.

God bless you.
 
However, you do realize that saying your belief in not being able to understand the divine, and therefore, you question those who do, defeats your attempt to say we can’t know God? ā€œI know enough about God to know that He is unknowable.ā€
lol.

Not really. At some point you sit back, drink a beer, a watch other people ride the circular argument. 😃

The tao that can be named is not the Eternal Tao.
 
What we do know has been revealed to us. We know that God is a Trinity of Persons, for instance.
But you ā€œknowā€ this because you accept Jesus as Divine, and not only that, but because you accept the writings of the disciples of the Apostles as divinely inspired. Once either of those two are rejected, then…
But He has given you the gift of faith which is more valuable than any experience.
I don’t have faith. I have experienced Divinity and that has led to an understanding. Anything outside of my experience and the understanding that comes from it I can’t comment on. šŸ™‚
 
But you ā€œknowā€ this because you accept Jesus as Divine, and not only that, but because you accept the writings of the disciples of the Apostles as divinely inspired. Once either of those two are rejected, then…
Then you would still be left with an objective, historically verifiable claim made by the first Christians within a few days of Easter who stated to be eyewitnesses to the resurrected Christ. Which, if it can be shown to be a reliable eyewitness, would mean that Jesus is divine, which would make the apostolic writings divinely inspired…etc.

Which means I do not believe the Bible to be true because the Bible says that it is true. I believe the Bible to be true because the one who was raised from death to life says it’s true.
 
But you ā€œknowā€ this because you accept Jesus as Divine, and not only that, but because you accept the writings of the disciples of the Apostles as divinely inspired. Once either of those two are rejected, then…
Ahh, but my acceptance of Jesus as divine is not something I just choose to believe. I look at the scriptures, the witnesse to His life, I hear His words and hear about His miracles. I decide, based upon all of this that He was who He said He was. I then see that He started a Church and I read the promises He made to that Church. It is then, through the guidance of the Church He founded, that I come to the conclusion that He is, in fact, divine. In addition, I accept the claim from the Church that the writings are divinely inspired. That’s a thumbnail sketch of my reasoning.
I don’t have faith. I have experienced Divinity and that has led to an understanding. Anything outside of my experience and the understanding that comes from it I can’t comment on. šŸ™‚
I’m a little confused here. I thought that you just told me that you had not had a personal experience of ā€œDivinityā€ as you call it. I’m sorry you have lost your faith. I’ll pray that your faith will be restored.
 
The Catechism of the Catholic Church defines ā€œSacramentā€ as follows:

ā€œAn efficacious sign of grace, instituted by Christ and entrusted to the Church, by which divine life is dispensed to us through the work of the Holy Spirit. The sacraments (called ā€˜mysteries’ in the Eastern Churches) are seven in number: Baptism, Confirmation, Eucharist, Penance or Reconciliation, Anointing of the Sick, Holy Orders, and Matrimony.ā€

I have heard of Baptism being described as an ordinance (not absolutely necessary) or a profession of faith. As Catholics we believe the sacraments are the means of acquiring God’s grace, that they have a real, necessary, salvific, supernatural effect upon our soul. What say you?
Steve,

I’m glad you started this Thread. I just finished going through all the posts on Thread: Protestants: Sinner’s Prayer-What must it say and does it assure Salvation?

In Post #57, I gave a response to you, crazzeto, Padrej, and FrJohnB, regarding profession of faith in relation to the Sacraments.
Partial Quote from that post, which applies to this Thread:
. . . . .According to the Southern Baptist Convention (SBC) (www.sbc.net):šŸ™‚ the Baptismal Candidate must be a ā€œregenerate believer in Jesus Christ.ā€ Baptism is ā€œpurely symbolic and distinct from salvation itself.ā€ The means of Baptism is ā€œimmersion.ā€ One is Baptized ā€œunto faith in Christ.ā€ One is Baptized ā€œwith a view toward eternal life that cannot be lost once graciously given by God.ā€ Baptism is ā€œsymbolic unto the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.ā€ Infant Baptism is absolutely forbidden.

If one has been baptized in another Church that views Baptism as ā€œsacramental or regenerative,ā€ or in a church that does not embrace the ā€œdoctrine of the security of the believer,ā€ one must be Baptized again in accordance with SBC guidelines. More details at www.sbc.net.

. . . . .Reading those requirements, again, on the Southern Baptist Convention website, actually causes anxiety for me. It is so difficult to break free from this indoctrination. I’m working on it. I appreciate all your posts.

Working out my salvation in fear and trembling,
Anna
Growing up in Baptist Churches, I never heard the word ā€œSacrament.ā€ In the Baptist Church, Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are purely symbolic.

Now that I am able to find evidence in Scripture (& early Church tradition) for infant Baptism, and for graces imparted during Baptism and the Eucharist; I can’t quite understand why Baptists claim ā€œregenerationā€ does not occur in Baptism.

I haven’t actually found an instance in the New Testament, in which one prayed for salvation and received regeneration. Are there any such passages?

The N.T. does point to graces imparted in Baptism:

1 Peter 3: 18 For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit, 19 in which he went and proclaimed to the spirits in prison, 20 because they formerly did not obey, when God’s patience waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through water. 21 Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, 22 who has gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God, with angels, authorities, and powers having been subjected to him.

The Southern Baptist Convention says that Baptism is ā€œsymbolic unto the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.ā€ Yet, Luke Chapter 3, says that the Baptism of Christ is one of the Holy Spirit and of fire. This is not a picture of a purely symbolic act. Work is clearly being done in the Sacrament of Baptism.

Luke 3: 15 As the people were in expectation, and all were questioning in their hearts concerning John, whether he might be the Christ, 16 John answered them all, saying, "I baptize you with water, but he who is mightier than I is coming, the strap of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire.

In Romans Chapter 6, the description of Baptism is, again, dynamic.

**Romans 6: ** 3 Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life.
**5 For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his.
6 We know that our old self was crucified with him in order that the body of sin might be brought to nothing, so that we would no longer be enslaved to sin. **
7 For one who has died has been set free from sin. 8 Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with him. 9 We know that Christ, being raised from the dead, will never die again; death no longer has dominion over him. 10 For the death he died he died to sin, once for all, but the life he lives he lives to God. 11 So you also must consider yourselves dead to sin and alive to God in Christ Jesus.

I am still quite amazed by the description of Baptism as the ā€œcircumcision made without hands.ā€ The passage, in Colossians Chapter 2, lends understanding regarding the Baptism of infants. As circumcision was performed on the 8th day, so also, was Baptism performed on the 8th day—Circumcision being under the Old Covenant, and Baptism under the New Covenant.

Colossians 2: 8See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ.
9For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily, 10and you have been filled in him, who is the head of all rule and authority. 11In him also you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, 12 having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead.
13 And you, who were dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, 14by canceling the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This he set aside, nailing it to the cross. 15 He disarmed the rulers and authorities and put them to open shame, by triumphing over them in him.

Can’t understand why Baptists, and some other Protestant Churches, take the graces imparted in Baptism, and connect them to a prayer (Sinner’s Prayer)–don’t see how this is justified.

Similar problem with the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist; but don’t have the energy for that discussion, now.

On the Southern Baptist Convention website (sbc.net/bfm/bfm2000.asp#vii), the Scriptures given to support Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are as follows:

Matthew 3:13-17; 26:26-30; 28:19-20;
Mark 1:9-11; 14:22-26;
Luke 3:21-22; 22:19-20;
John 3:23; Acts 2:41-42; 8:35-39; 16:30-33; 20:7;
Romans 6:3-5; 1
Corinthians 10:16,21; 11:23-29;
Colossians 2:12.

Notice: SBC-Regarding Baptism:
Colossians 2:8-11 is omitted.
1 Peter 3:18-22 is omitted.
Luke 3:15-16 is omitted.
Romans 6:6-11 is omitted.

Notice: SBC-Regarding the Lord’s Supper:
John Chapter 6 is omitted.

Great Thread, Steve,
Anna
 
I’m a little confused here. I thought that you just told me that you had not had a personal experience of ā€œDivinityā€ as you call it. I’m sorry you have lost your faith. I’ll pray that your faith will be restored.
My experience of Divinity is not of a personal God, rather a transcendent Unknowable Divinity. When I have experienced Divinity, it is as Darkness.
 
My experience of Divinity is not of a personal God, rather a transcendent Unknowable Divinity. When I have experienced Divinity, it is as Darkness.
I relate to your statement to a point…when I think of God as an Unknowable Divinity…I remember that God is made known in Jesus of Nazareth…the whole message of the Incarnation is ā€œGod with usā€ā€¦ā€œand the Word was made flesh and dwelled among us.ā€ā€¦Christ is the ā€œexact representation of his personā€ā€¦if I want to know what God is like…I look to Jesus of Nazarethā€¦ā€œGod with usā€.
 
I think that sacraments are something that we do in order to get a closer relationship to christ. I know of some catholics that have never been confirmed as well as were never married (just like priests). Therefore I don’t think they are things needed to be done in order for salvation.
 
Can’t understand why Baptists, and some other Protestant Churches, take the graces imparted in Baptism, and connect them to a prayer (Sinner’s Prayer)–don’t see how this is justified.

Similar problem with the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist; but don’t have the energy for that discussion, now.

On the Southern Baptist Convention website (sbc.net/bfm/bfm2000.asp#vii), the Scriptures given to support Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are as follows:

Matthew 3:13-17; 26:26-30; 28:19-20;
Mark 1:9-11; 14:22-26;
Luke 3:21-22; 22:19-20;
John 3:23; Acts 2:41-42; 8:35-39; 16:30-33; 20:7;
Romans 6:3-5; 1
Corinthians 10:16,21; 11:23-29;
Colossians 2:12.

Notice: SBC-Regarding Baptism:
Colossians 2:8-11 is omitted.
1 Peter 3:18-22 is omitted.
Luke 3:15-16 is omitted.
Romans 6:6-11 is omitted.

Notice: SBC-Regarding the Lord’s Supper:
John Chapter 6 is omitted.

Great Thread, Steve,
Anna
Anna, thanks for all your research and your comments. You know, I never ceased to be amazed at the different meanings and interpretations of scripture by different denominations. Just look at the Mormon and JW view of scripture. I really think that it boils down to approaching scripture with a pre-conceived notion and then bending, twisting and omitting verses to support that position. In other words, We KNOW that X is true, therefore this verse can’t mean what people think it means.

We need to let scripture speak to us rather than the other way around. It is the reason we need to have one, authentic and authoritative interpreter and that is precisely what we believe we have with the Magisterium of the Catholic Church. Scripture does not interpret itself and I know, after listening to people who know a lot more than I, that I have no way of understanding the language and culture of biblical times to make a valid interpretation. I am very often surprised at how far off I am when I finally learn the truth.
It’s why Jesus started a Church on earth and didn’t just say ā€œgood luckā€.

Thanks for the great post.
 
Steve,

I’m glad you started this Thread. I just finished going through all the posts on Thread: Protestants: Sinner’s Prayer-What must it say and does it assure Salvation?

In Post #57, I gave a response to you, crazzeto, Padrej, and FrJohnB, regarding profession of faith in relation to the Sacraments.
Partial Quote from that post, which applies to this Thread:

Growing up in Baptist Churches, I never heard the word ā€œSacrament.ā€ In the Baptist Church, Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are purely symbolic.

Now that I am able to find evidence in Scripture (& early Church tradition) for infant Baptism, and for graces imparted during Baptism and the Eucharist; I can’t quite understand why Baptists claim ā€œregenerationā€ does not occur in Baptism.

I haven’t actually found an instance in the New Testament, in which one prayed for salvation and received regeneration. Are there any such passages?

The N.T. does point to graces imparted in Baptism:

1 Peter 3: 18 For Christ also suffered once for sins, the righteous for the unrighteous, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh but made alive in the spirit, 19 in which he went and proclaimed to the spirits in prison, 20 because they formerly did not obey, when God’s patience waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was being prepared, in which a few, that is, eight persons, were brought safely through water. 21 Baptism, which corresponds to this, now saves you, not as a removal of dirt from the body but as an appeal to God for a good conscience, through the resurrection of Jesus Christ, 22 who has gone into heaven and is at the right hand of God, with angels, authorities, and powers having been subjected to him.

The Southern Baptist Convention says that Baptism is ā€œsymbolic unto the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus Christ.ā€ Yet, Luke Chapter 3, says that the Baptism of Christ is one of the Holy Spirit and of fire. This is not a picture of a purely symbolic act. Work is clearly being done in the Sacrament of Baptism.

Luke 3: 15 As the people were in expectation, and all were questioning in their hearts concerning John, whether he might be the Christ, 16 John answered them all, saying, "I baptize you with water, but he who is mightier than I is coming, the strap of whose sandals I am not worthy to untie. He will baptize you with the Holy Spirit and with fire.

In Romans Chapter 6, the description of Baptism is, again, dynamic.

**Romans 6: ** 3 Do you not know that all of us who have been baptized into Christ Jesus were baptized into his death? 4 We were buried therefore with him by baptism into death, in order that, just as Christ was raised from the dead by the glory of the Father, we too might walk in newness of life.
**5 For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we shall certainly be united with him in a resurrection like his.
6 We know that our old self was crucified with him in order that the body of sin might be brought to nothing, so that we would no longer be enslaved to sin. **
7 For one who has died has been set free from sin. 8 Now if we have died with Christ, we believe that we will also live with him. 9 We know that Christ, being raised from the dead, will never die again; death no longer has dominion over him. 10 For the death he died he died to sin, once for all, but the life he lives he lives to God. 11 So you also must consider yourselves dead to sin and alive to God in Christ Jesus.

I am still quite amazed by the description of Baptism as the ā€œcircumcision made without hands.ā€ The passage, in Colossians Chapter 2, lends understanding regarding the Baptism of infants. As circumcision was performed on the 8th day, so also, was Baptism performed on the 8th day—Circumcision being under the Old Covenant, and Baptism under the New Covenant.

Colossians 2: 8See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ.
9For in him the whole fullness of deity dwells bodily, 10and you have been filled in him, who is the head of all rule and authority. 11In him also you were circumcised with a circumcision made without hands, by putting off the body of the flesh, by the circumcision of Christ, 12 having been buried with him in baptism, in which you were also raised with him through faith in the powerful working of God, who raised him from the dead.
13 And you, who were dead in your trespasses and the uncircumcision of your flesh, God made alive together with him, having forgiven us all our trespasses, 14by canceling the record of debt that stood against us with its legal demands. This he set aside, nailing it to the cross. 15 He disarmed the rulers and authorities and put them to open shame, by triumphing over them in him.

Can’t understand why Baptists, and some other Protestant Churches, take the graces imparted in Baptism, and connect them to a prayer (Sinner’s Prayer)–don’t see how this is justified.

Similar problem with the Sacrament of the Holy Eucharist; but don’t have the energy for that discussion, now.

On the Southern Baptist Convention website (sbc.net/bfm/bfm2000.asp#vii), the Scriptures given to support Baptism and the Lord’s Supper are as follows:

Matthew 3:13-17; 26:26-30; 28:19-20;
Mark 1:9-11; 14:22-26;
Luke 3:21-22; 22:19-20;
John 3:23; Acts 2:41-42; 8:35-39; 16:30-33; 20:7;
Romans 6:3-5; 1
Corinthians 10:16,21; 11:23-29;
Colossians 2:12.

Notice: SBC-Regarding Baptism:
Colossians 2:8-11 is omitted.
1 Peter 3:18-22 is omitted.
Luke 3:15-16 is omitted.
Romans 6:6-11 is omitted.

Notice: SBC-Regarding the Lord’s Supper:
John Chapter 6 is omitted.

Great Thread, Steve,
Anna
Anna if you don’t mind explaining the infant baptism thing to me. I think you pointed out in Colossians 2 but I can’t see how it is interpreted. Thanks
 
I relate to your statement to a point…when I think of God as an Unknowable Divinity…I remember that God is made known in Jesus of Nazareth…the whole message of the Incarnation is ā€œGod with usā€ā€¦ā€œand the Word was made flesh and dwelled among us.ā€ā€¦Christ is the ā€œexact representation of his personā€ā€¦if I want to know what God is like…I look to Jesus of Nazarethā€¦ā€œGod with usā€.
I couldn’t have said it better! šŸ‘
 
My experience of Divinity is not of a personal God, rather a transcendent Unknowable Divinity. When I have experienced Divinity, it is as Darkness.
How do you ā€œexperienceā€ a ā€œtranscendent Unknowable Divinityā€? We only know God through Jesus as Publisher said. Not sure what you mean about experiencing Divinity as ā€œDarknessā€. Are you speaking of a mystical experience? St. John of the cross wrote about the ā€œdark night of the soulā€, but that is more in reference to spiritual dryness I think.
What do you mean exactly?
 
He made an interesting observation. I have always thought of the sacraments, like preaching the word, to be likened to an army invading hostile territory. Similar to when Jesus would cast out demons and heal the sick and then pronounce that the strong man has been bound. The army of the kingdom of God invades the fallen world to slowly, yard by yard, take back creation from its bondage to the Satanic realm. Every time sins are forgiven in Holy Baptism; everytime Christ’s body and blood enter the mouth of a sinner, every time Holy Absolution is pronounced, another citadel of Satan falls until the return of our King. Divine intersecting reality… you betcha.
Great post Triune. šŸ‘
 
I understand that I don’t understand Divinity. That lack of understanding leads me to question any religion that says they do understand. :lol: I got to the point in my life that the only part of the Creed I could say truthfully was ā€œI believe in Godā€. I couldn’t say the rest.
So, I take it that you were a Catholic Christian at one time?
FWIW, I’ve never experienced Divinity (God) as personal (to this point in life, anyway)… Even in my days as a Charismatic Catholic, I never experienced God as personal.
This is an interesting statement. Before I was Catholic (when I was Protestant) I experienced God as distant, but personal. Now I experience, as a Cartholic, that God is super-personal and interpersonal; in fact, that is what the Catholic doctrine of the Most Holy Trinity is all about. Like St. Augustine said of the Trinity, ā€œGod is Lover, Beloved, and the Love they share.ā€ God is, literally, a Communion.
 
My experience of Divinity is not of a personal God, rather a transcendent Unknowable Divinity. When I have experienced Divinity, it is as Darkness.
God, in many respects, is clouded in darkness; this is a common theme in Catholic Mysticism. Have you ever read The* Cloud of Unknowing*, or the* Interior Castle*? Or The Dark Night of the Soul? Even the Psalms are replete with references of a hidden God, a God enshrouded in darkness:
**

Psalm 18 [Excerpt]

The earth shook and trembled: the foundations of the mountains were troubled and were moved, because he was angry with them.
There went up a smoke in his wrath: and a fire flamed from his face: coals were kindled by it.
He bowed the heavens, and came down: and darkness was under his feet.
And he ascended upon the cherubim, and he flew; he flew upon the wings of the winds.
And he made darkness his covert, his pavilion round about him: dark waters in the clouds of the air.
At the brightness that was before him the clouds passed, hail and coals of fire.**
 
How do you ā€œexperienceā€ a ā€œtranscendent Unknowable Divinityā€?
The way It wants to be experienced. Lol. When you encounter It, you know It.
Not sure what you mean about experiencing Divinity as ā€œDarknessā€.
It’s hard to explain if you haven’t experienced it yourself. You understand infinity, I’d guess? How can something that is finite experience the infinite? Only be becoming so overwhelmed that you lose all senses and rest in the Darkness of the Divine. Light is no longer Light, but dark.
 
I relate to your statement to a point…when I think of God as an Unknowable Divinity…I remember that God is made known in Jesus of Nazareth…the whole message of the Incarnation is ā€œGod with usā€ā€¦ā€œand the Word was made flesh and dwelled among us.ā€ā€¦Christ is the ā€œexact representation of his personā€ā€¦if I want to know what God is like…I look to Jesus of Nazarethā€¦ā€œGod with usā€.
That is the most powerful stories of Christianity and Catholicism in particular - that Divinity become one of us, not in accident, but in substance. This is the heart of the power of the sacramental system of Catholicism.

But I still can’t relate to personally to Jesus. How can I? I never met the dude. lol
 
So, I take it that you were a Catholic Christian at one time?
Yep. šŸ™‚
Now I experience, as a Cartholic, that God is super-personal and interpersonal; in fact, that is what the Catholic doctrine of the Most Holy Trinity is all about. Like St. Augustine said of the Trinity, ā€œGod is Lover, Beloved, and the Love they share.ā€ God is, literally, a Communion.
I’m glad you found a paradigm of Divinity that you can relate to. šŸ™‚
 
The way It wants to be experienced. Lol. When you encounter It, you know It.
Now that is funny!!! :clapping:
It’s hard to explain if you haven’t experienced it yourself. You understand infinity, I’d guess? How can something that is finite experience the infinite? Only be becoming so overwhelmed that you lose all senses and rest in the Darkness of the Divine. Light is no longer Light, but dark.
What you sound like you’re saying is that you are experiencing mystical prayer which is rare and beautiful. I totally agree that we cannot wrap our minds around the eternal God. Mystical prayer occurs in the spirit, not in the intellect and many Christian Mystics describe what you are saying in essence. It is a spiritual union with God, rather than an understanding of Him. But I can believe in HIm because He has revealed Himself to us, most profoundly in the person of Jesus Christ. You are right, the finite cannot grasp the infinite, but we can have a glimpse that gives us hope for what is awaiting us.

God bless.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top