T
tafan2
Guest
All things being equal, marry a Catholic. Unfortunately all things are rarely equal.
That, too, is at the core of what I was trying to convey. Thank you.All things being equal, marry a Catholic.
I think what people find offensive is the judgement of the marriages of others and their motivations. Your first post in this thread was extremely judgmental.am sorry if you find it offensiv
At present you are still married. You are not on the market, not available, and should not be thinking of new mates. It does not matter how your marriage is or was. You are at this point, still married. It would be up to a Tribunal to determine its status and potential annulment.I do not think there is anything scandalous in discussing a hypothetical future event.
Thoughts? I’m so glad that wasn’t my husband’s criteria as I would not be Catholic and raising 4, soon to be 5, Catholic children.Thoughts and experiences to share?
I did no such thing, and I don’t think I said anything judgmental at all. I just made a general statement, and beyond that, I just stated facts, and what I myself would do. I did not say one bad thing about anyone else.am sorry if you find it offensiv
I am not “thinking of new mates”. I am describing a possible hypothetical future situation. It is the same as if I were to say “if my wife were to die and leave me a widower, I would have an a priori preference for marrying a Catholic”.At present you are still married. You are not on the market, not available, and should not be thinking of new mates. … If anyone approaches me about dates or asking if I would be interested in their male relative, I have to answer, no I am still married, no annulment.
I do not date, though I do have strictly platonic female friends. Not to sound self-righteous or anything, but the typical scenario is for a Catholic to show up in the parish office, already be in a relationship that is leading up to marriage, or even be engaged already, desperately seeking an annulment, the sooner the better. I wouldn’t even think of doing such a thing.
Yes, I have known of several marriages that are as you describe. For this kind of thing to play out, the Catholic needs to be the “alpha spouse” where matters of religion are concerned, take the lead, and draw the non-Catholic “beta spouse” into this kind of relationship with the Church.Experiences? I know many people talk about how hazardous marrying a non-Catholic can be. And believe me, I know there are challenges. I lived a small number of them before my conversion. But in my experience, of all the Catholic/non-Catholic marriages I know, the non-Catholic spouse either converts or participates in parish life in such a way that it is nearly impossible to tell that they aren’t Catholic unless you closely monitor whether they take communion. This includes my in laws and multiple couples I know through our parish. I know many aren’t so fortunate but I think people don’t realize how often it does work.
It is a thought in your head and you have acted on it by writing it down on a forum. We must not encourage married, civilly divorced Catholics to give these thoughts any air time.I am describing a possible hypothetical future situation.
And that is where we have to be the example. You have to be the example, as do I. Say to your civilly divorced friend/relative ‘hey get an annulment before you think of dating’. Otherwise lives can become very messy.but the typical scenario is for a Catholic to show up in the parish office, already be in a relationship that is leading up to marriage, or even be engaged already, desperately seeking an annulment, the sooner the better. I wouldn’t even think of doing such a thing.
I disagree and I think a couple of other people read it the same way I did. I’m muting this thread.I did no such thing, and I don’t think I said anything judgmental at all. I just made a general statement, and beyond that, I just stated facts, and what I myself
I’ve said all I am going to say about it. “If I were in that situation…”. That’s all.I am describing a possible hypothetical future situation.
Quite agreed, and I did not say it was right. I was explaining to a friend of mine the other day (male neighbor) that I cannot marry without an annulment.And that is where we have to be the example. You have to be the example, as do I. Say to your civilly divorced friend/relative ‘hey get an annulment before you think of dating’. Otherwise lives can become very messy.
The typical scenario does not make it the right scenario.
It does make raising kids easier, as well as dealing with things like nfp.Or a better way of putting it might be “shouldn’t a Catholic always have a preference for marrying a fellow Catholic?”.
I have read that while Reform Judaism is shrinking, Orthodox Judaism is steadily growing. I think mixed marriages among the Orthodox are rare (or perhaps virtually nonexistent in the stricter groups). Orthodox To Dominate American Jewry In Coming Decades – The ForwardI understand the churches desire for their members to marry within the faith. Judaism is slowly dying with so many marrying outside the faith or just not following it to begin with. But, I really don’t think it can do much to stop mixed marriages. They’ll lose followers if they become too strict over it and lose members if they allow it. By allowing it, I think they stand in a better position to retain them…at least less anger about it!
If you don’t mind my asking, why do you say this?Despite being a practicing Catholic, i actually almost don’t want to marry a Catholic man but someone else who would put up with my beliefs
You hit the nail right on the head!The purpose of marriage is to help each other get to heaven. Pick your spouse accordingly.
Another point well taken.Will the non-Catholic spouse model the life of a devout Catholic for his or her children?
Only a few people here a eligible to marry in the first place.It is entirely appropriate to discuss here and particularly to discuss criteria for chosing a spouse.