This thread is not so much of someone really wanting to pose nude for an art class as someone trying to cause a titillating argument on a Catholic forum. Read her other posts and one can see that this is more about being on the edge of Catholic Christian morality and following that and pushing the boundaries to the edge. The problem with always being on the edge is that you will fall over it.
Why? Well, we do have that pesky bible thing which tells us we will be.
And some people call porn art. It isn’t.
But where’s the line?
Ha ha, well, I won’t say you’re entirely wrong. Since you put it that way, I must admit, there’s probably a lot of truth there. I didn’t intend to use any of you, and I do have some little interest in modeling, including nude possibly (I never claimed anything more) but I’m afraid I do enjoy titillating conversations. Please believe me though when I say I did not consciously begin this thread with the idea of toying with you people, and have found this conversation genuinely fascinating and challenging.
Eloquent, but I’d appreciate if you’d give me an example. I try my best to be a chaste and Godly teenager, though I often fall. And so I’m really puzzled why you’d think that of me. It is true in that I think many things are acceptable that some others don’t, but one could say that of many. We all have different opinions.
I think your admission is enough that this was a scam. If you are trying to be a Godly teenage and chaste, it is curious as to why you have posted on threads dealing with sex and marriage. Not sure what to say to you but your flirtation with all of the above speaks mountains about what is in your heart and where your interests are which isn’t trying to be a Godly chaste teenage. Likewise starting a thread that is basically a lie isn’t in the Godly category too. Your posts gave me the clue that this whole thing wasn’t real.
enjoying titillating conversations is not someone trying to be a chaste teenager. No one said you are bad but you are not being honest with yourself and trying to start titillating threads likewise is not suggesting someone with a pure heart or motives or even trying to achieve that goal. I suggest you stop looking at nude art and read the Bible which says “flee youthful lust”. Likewise Jesus said that “who so ever looks at a women with lust commits adultery in their heart”. and finally “whatever is true, lovely etc, think on these things”. Spend some time looking up these verses instead of getting kicks out of titillating conversations about sex.
x2
nude≠pornx2
I wonder whether the posters on this thread supporting this would still support it if the nude model in question or the poster Pound Coolish was their daughter, mother or better yet … their wife. I wonder whether the same things would be said.
The great exploitation and degradation of women in the west continues, trying to mask porn under ‘art’ but the last place I expected to find it was here from people on CAF.
Thank you for reading
Josh
Could you please explain.
As a matter of fact, I saw someone selling semi-nude photos from the 1950s, and in each description, he wrote: “Art not Porn.” That’s how the continuing degradation of women spreads over the decades. First, it’s a little graphic, then a little more, followed by a little more, until we hit the 1970s and porn (Adult) bookstores open everywhere. Then someone tries to convince us that those “Old” photos are art. In used bookstores, today, those “art/model” magazines from the 1950s are stacked by the more graphic stuff.x2
I wonder whether the posters on this thread supporting this would still support it if the nude model in question or the poster Pound Coolish was their daughter, mother or better yet … their wife. I wonder whether the same things would be said.
The great exploitation and degradation of women in the west continues, trying to mask porn under ‘art’ but the last place I expected to find it was here from people on CAF.
Thank you for reading
Josh
If I said the statue of David was art and not porn would that make sense? The statue is nude, but not designed for sexual arousal.
Sounds like you think Gods creation is dirty and wrong, and should be not be viewed by anyone?
It is the conservatives who got any nudity on the television banned and liberals who pushed for legalization of abortion. Not hypocritical in reality.
