Nudity is immodest - why exactly?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Miles_Mariae
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
M

Miles_Mariae

Guest
From another thread, but i got this was the general opinion: apparently bikinis are immodest to wear while swimming, at least among US Catholics.

Why?

It’s an honest question, and I’m really curious.

I don’t see one’s stomach, back, legs, arms, shoulders, feet, and genitalia as sexually temtping in any way, so I really don’t understand how not wearing anything is more ‘immodest’ than a one-piece.

To be clear, I don’t think one-pieces are immodest either, as there is really nothing sexual about arms and legs and such…
 
Prayer for Humility

O Jesus! meek and humble of heart, hear me
From the desire of being esteemed,
From the desire of being loved,
From the desire of being extolled,
From the desire of being honored,
From the desire of being praised,
From the desire of being preferred,
From the desire of being consulted,
From the desire of being approved,
Deliver me, Jesus.
From the fear of being humiliated,
From the fear of being despised,
From the fear of suffering rebukes,
From the fear of being calumniated,
From the fear of being forgotten,
From the fear of being ridiculed,
From the fear of being wronged,
From the fear of being suspected,
Deliver me, Jesus.
That others may be loved more than I,
That others may be esteemed more than I,
That in the opinion of the world, others may increase,
and I may decrease
That others may be chosen and I set aside,
That others may be praised and I unnoticed,
That others may become holier than I, provided that I may
become as holy as I should,
Jesus, grant me the grace to desire it.
 
These threads are getting ridiculous. Such pride.😦
Such is the nature of parody threads…

Feel free to debate this with me, though. I will use the LitCrit Method ™ until reality no longer makes sense.
 
From another thread, but i got this was the general opinion: apparently bikinis are immodest to wear while swimming, at least among US Catholics.

Why?

It’s an honest question, and I’m really curious.

I don’t see one’s stomach, back, legs, arms, shoulders, feet, and genitalia as sexually temtping in any way, so I really don’t understand how not wearing anything is more ‘immodest’ than a one-piece.

To be clear, I don’t think one-pieces are immodest either, as there is really nothing sexual about arms and legs and such…
I remember at the beginning of the movie, The Song of Bernadette, the following saying:

To those who believe in God, no explanation is necessary.

To those who don’t believe in God, no explanation is possible.
 
I remember at the beginning of the movie, The Song of Bernadette, the following saying:

To those who believe in God, no explanation is necessary.

To those who don’t believe in God, no explanation is possible.
Credo in unum Deum, Patrem omnipotentem.
 
I remember at the beginning of the movie, The Song of Bernadette, the following saying:

To those who believe in God, no explanation is necessary.

To those who don’t believe in God, no explanation is possible.
Oh–I like that! Good reply.🙂

To the OP–do you mean as in nudist communities, or like we should be able and allowed to walk around in public, nude? Or do you mean in private? :confused:
 
Oh–I like that! Good reply.🙂

To the OP–do you mean as in nudist communities, or like we should be able and allowed to walk around in public, nude? Or do you mean in private? :confused:
I mean it as a parody of the spaghetti strap and bikini threads 😉
 
Is it kind to mock others’ honest questions about cultural differences?
 
There’s nothing wrong with publicly showing bank statements and tax returns either. :whacky: But we don’t do we. It’s called personal and private.

Not to mention concupisence and cleanliness.

🙂
 
I would really recommend the book A RETURN TO MODESTY: Discovering the Lost Virtue by Wendy Shalit. She’s not Catholic, rather Jewish, but she does an amazing job of addressing modesty. She answers your question in her book.
 
Is it kind to mock others’ honest questions about cultural differences?
Thank you so much, Jen. I’m blushing and have tears in my eyes, and don’t see what I did to warrant this, as I don’t recall being offensive to anyone here, but I’ll actually even answer this question honestly.

We live in a fallen world. Adam and Eve were naked before the fall, but after it felt compelled to cover their genitals (in all art that I’ve seen representing the scene at least).

Different cultures vary on what should be hidden from sight and on what causes sexual attraction, but genitals are covered in every culture. In mine, bikinis and speedos are the norm for the beach, but topless girls excite lust.

I would personally prefer to swim and sunbathe in the nude. I love the water and the sun on my skin. But because of the fall and because of the further restrictions that exist in my culture, I don’t.

I offer apologies to everyone I have apparently managed to offend with my questions. I won’t ask any more on this topic. 🤷
 
These threads are getting ridiculous. Such pride.😦
:confused: Pride? Maybe, but I haven’t seen that. Someone said they weren’t inspired to sin or near occassion there of by a certian style or lack of. That’s not pride. For that person, it simply is. I haven’t seen anyone say they are purposely trying to illicit such behaviors either.

There’s nothing wrong with publicly showing bank statements and tax returns either. :whacky: But we don’t do we. It’s called personal and private.

Not to mention concupisence and cleanliness.

🙂
**I think it’s a question of whether in one’s mind other’s WANT to see it then? Frankly any one who wants to can look at my bank statements or tax return if they ask nicely. Why they’d care to see them is beyond me. Lord knows they aren’t doing ME any good.🤷 **

Hmm…
I never read that there was anything wrong with nudity, even after the fall. Rather it was the perception of nakedness by Adam and Eve that was wrong. God even asked why they had covered themselves, implying that God didn’t think they should need to be covered? Just a thought. There’s nude statues all over the Vatican and in christian art.


Personally, I think the entire discussion has gotten rather puritanical. There is nothing wrong with spaggettii straps, imho, although I’d rather not show my flabby underarms.

**According to some puritans Jesus himself would have been considered immodest for having bare feet. In God’s house even! gasp **

**If one wants to be a puritan then that’s fine by me, but it’s an error to presume that others are less christian or sinning if they don’t agree. Modesty is mostly a cultural thing. In our culture it is NOT immodest to wear spaggetti straps.🤷 **
 
I never read that there was anything wrong with nudity, even after the fall. Rather it was the perception of nakedness by Adam and Eve that was wrong. God even asked why they had covered themselves, implying that God didn’t think they should need to be covered? Just a thought. There’s nude statues all over the Vatican and in christian art.
I have read PLENTY about the wrongness of nudity. Of course we are talking about public nudity here. You ever hear about the near occasions of sin?
 
Thank you, Martha, for your sanity and balance.

While I personally do believe total nudity is wrong after the fall (or I’d so be a nudist!), I agree with your reasoning. 🙂
 
From another thread, but i got this was the general opinion: apparently bikinis are immodest to wear while swimming, at least among US Catholics.

Why?

It’s an honest question, and I’m really curious.

I don’t see one’s stomach, back, legs, arms, shoulders, feet, and genitalia as sexually temtping in any way, so I really don’t understand how not wearing anything is more ‘immodest’ than a one-piece.

To be clear, I don’t think one-pieces are immodest either, as there is really nothing sexual about arms and legs and such…
Yeah, but if you were to see me or any of the male members of my family you would understand the powerful attraction and animal magnetism that make bathing suits a necessity. They save souls!!!

Did anyone fall for it?:rolleyes:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top