Absolutely, mercy and forgiveness are paramount for Christians.
However, that does not mean that justice should be neglected in order to provide mercy **without **justice.
As the situation stands, this young man from Bolivia was caught twice before and ordered to undergo treatment and jail time, but was released on serving just a fraction of the time, and was never adequately supervised or required to followup. His family state that for years they tried to convince him to get the treatment he needed.
This young man apparently spent most of his formative years here in the U.S., attending school here from 3rd grade onward. This is not someone who has come ‘recently’ and has little knowledge of the system or little support.
Yet we cannot judge all people as equally ‘culpable’ because this one young man who happens to be here illegally committed a crime. Plenty of ‘native’ Americans have been guilty of driving drunk, not going to treatment, etc., exactly like this young man. His being here illegally, in other words, did not make him more likely to be a criminal than a person here legally. He possesses the same ‘free will’ that we all possess.
Mercy and justice for this young man would not be the same perhaps as for a young person who was likewise brought here as a child illegally, whose lifestyle was one of hard work and lawful behavior outside that one example (and of course, a person brought here as a child did not himself choose to break the law at that time). . .that ‘law abiding’ illegal immigrant might be given amnesty gladly for he would have shown his intention to obey laws now that he was old enough to choose for himself.
An illegal immigrant who was guilty however of other unlawful behaviors on TOP of already being here illegally (even if the original entrance was not his choice due to young age) might not be offered amnesty and a chance to become ‘legal’ because he is showing that even if he did not choose to enter illegally himself, he would freely as an adult choose OTHER wrong behaviors.
And this would be both merciful and just–merciful to those who were ‘hurt’ by the wrong behavior, merciful to the perpetrator as well in being aware that ACTIONS HAVE CONSEQUENCES. One would not give this man a ‘greater’ sentence (in the event of trial and conviction) than another, but ‘mercy’ and forgiveness do not mean that one blindly ‘forgets’ and leaves the conditions ripe for other wrong actions to keep multiplying, IMHO.