D
Debora123
Guest
In all fairness, there is nothing wrong with “homosexuals.”
It would have been better if you had phrased it “supports homosexual activity.”
- Status
It would have been better if you had phrased it “supports homosexual activity.”
J
JimR-OCDS
Guest
Also, when was it wrong for a president to meet privately with his supporters?When did “privately” become “secretly” (wow, what biased headlining) and how *secret *could it be if it’s all over the internet?
You think Republicans don’t meet privately with possible campaign contributors while on the trail? Every day.
But then, we have to keep in mind that this sin is reported by Newsmax, which is the internet mouth piece for conservatives.
Jim
R
ringil
Guest
I believe lifesitenews popularized it. That’s where I go to get quality coverage on current events!
J
Julia_Mae
Guest
I didn’t bash him at all. If I did, it wouldn’t be because he used a word that doesn’t exist. Plenty of people around here do that. It would be because he used a word that shouldn’t.
J
Julia_Mae
Guest
I’m not angry. I don’t vote because I don’t believe it matters. They wanted Bush to be president, so he was. They wanted Obama for some reason, so he is. Has nothing to do with us.However, I do wish people would vote based on who they genuinely feel will be the best for our country (given the facts) rather than out of anger from some random internet person’s thread.
But I find the other side so ugly, I really feel like the only thing necessary for evil to triumph is for people to ignore it.
I wonder where I can get an Obama bumper sticker? Maybe “Proud parent of a homosexualist!” Something like that. “Catholic…Christian, not necessarily in that order…”
Anyway, done here, so, y’all have the last go. I’m not angry. Mostly it makes me weep. I shouldn’t. I need to remember what Padre Pio said.
Pray, hope and don’t worry.
S
Scott_Lafrance
Guest
If voting for the most divisive, pro-abortion, anti-Catholic, and anti-freedom candidate makes you happy, you must be thrilled with Obama.
S
Scott_Lafrance
Guest
How a Catholic can joyfully vote for a man that is openly at war with the fundamental beliefs of Catholicism is mind-numbing.If you want to vote for Obama, that is, of course your right 100% and no one should give you a hard time about it.
However, I do wish people would vote based on who they genuinely feel will be the best for our country (given the facts) rather than out of anger from some random internet person’s thread.
C
Caldera
Guest
It is astounding that we even have a race for the next president.
D
Dawnia
Guest
Don’t forget “haters” and “homophobes” and “catlickers” and on and on and on…
N
Nec5
Guest
Ha, I thought you were referencing Romney too. But I guess he’s not quite as “open” as Obama.
D
Debora123
Guest
Catlicker? What’s that??
J
JNdoum
Guest
While I respect your opinion that voting doesn’t matter (in a sense, it doesn’t any more, because only about 20% of eligible voters actually vote in this nation), and I respect your decision to vote for Obama (rather, your right to make that decision). But I would by no means call Obama a pro-homosexual, or a very good politician. He has done little in the way of change, which he promised to give, and has been rather inactive in his seat as president. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t support Romney either, but between the two, I wouldn’t say that Obama was the lesser evil, especially as he is a so-called “pro-choice” man.
R
RACJ
Guest
What marching orders could Obama POSSIBLY have given to these fresh young Obots that is not fit for public consumption? One wonders…:bowdown: RobWhen did “privately” become “secretly” (wow, what biased headlining) and how *secret *could it be if it’s all over the internet?
You think Republicans don’t meet privately with possible campaign contributors while on the trail? Every day.
R
RACJ
Guest
A "feminazi" is someone whose entire existence seems to revolve around making sure that as many abortions as possible take place. You know, the kind who are outraged with pro-lifers who try to arm women with facts before they make a fatal decision. Or those who are insistent that a baby who is born alive should be left alone to die. People such as Barack Obama. Truth is hard to digest sometimes. :rolleyes: Rob
D
Debora123
Guest
I wonder if they feel the same way when the baby is a girl…A “feminazi” is someone whose entire existence seems to revolve around making sure that as many abortions as possible take place. You know, the kind who are outraged with pro-lifers who try to arm women with facts before they make a fatal decision. Or those who are insistent that a baby who is born alive should be left alone to die. People such as Barack Obama. Truth is hard to digest sometimes.Rob
T
Tsuwano
Guest
I don’t know if it is just you, Debora, but if you put aside your emotions and look at President Obama’s meeting with these young stars objectively, you’ll see that it really is a smart political move and certainly one any serious politician would do if he or she was running for President. These young actors have more influence than you might think, not only in this year’s elections, but in future elections as well. Many people are pursuaded to vote one way or another because their idol or favorite actor influences them. Believe me, if this wasn’t true, politicians wouldn’t waste their time courting such influence. I support Mr. Romney at this point and hope he has a few celebrities who will come out and show their support for him. Courting influence is not unprofessional or silly at all. It is what politicians must do if they hope to win elections. That is how a democracy works.
D
Debora123
Guest
It just seems tacky and goes to show how stupid our country is. Voting for a president because your favorite actor from some silly TV show supports him. Blah.
C
Crescentinus
Guest
He’s doing that because he is very desperate. He tried courting the GLBT vote and that may help him in November. Hence, I am not surprised.
D
Dejagirl
Guest
He has spent more time during his presidency promoting and focusing on his celebrity image than a presidential one. It really seems more of a natural fit for him - schmoozing with the Hollywood crowd. I’m surprised we don’t see him and the first lady more in the Hollywood gossip publications.
D
Debora123
Guest
Because the liberals love him, and the media is mostly made up of liberals. That’s why you don’t see many attacks on him or his family in the tabloids like we used to for President Bush.
- Status