Obama supported infanticide

  • Thread starter Thread starter MJE
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Why is allowing your baby to die cold and alone in a hosptial utility room an “choice”, but if left neglected at home and the baby died it would be homicide?
 
I heard that his argument was that Illinois already had a similar law illegalizing this practice.

Not saying he’s right, but is that true?
No his arguement to Jill Stanick who testified before the Senate was that it the baby was slated for obortion, it should be completed. He also felt it went againt Roe vs Wade.
 
No his arguement to Jill Stanick who testified before the Senate was that it the baby was slated for obortion, it should be completed. He also felt it went againt Roe vs Wade.
Is there a video or link to that? I just want to make sure in case I get in an argument with anyone about it. Is it on Jill Stanek’s blog?
 
Obama’s views in abortion are so extreme, it is a sad shame he ever became President.
 
Is there a video or link to that? I just want to make sure in case I get in an argument with anyone about it. Is it on Jill Stanek’s blog?
ilga.gov/senate/transcripts/strans92/ST033001.pdf

Obama: “That determination then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place.” (that is if an aborted baby survived and was born alive, it would be considered a child, and could not be killed) “I mean, it - - it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an antiabortion statute. For that purpose, I think it would probably be found unconstitutional”.

It doesn’t get any sicker than this folks!
 
ilga.gov/senate/transcripts/strans92/ST033001.pdf

Obama: “That determination then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place.” (that is if an aborted baby survived and was born alive, it would be considered a child, and could not be killed) “I mean, it - - it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an antiabortion statute. For that purpose, I think it would probably be found unconstitutional”.

It doesn’t get any sicker than this folks!
Sure it does -54% of catholic voters supported him in spite of this.
 
The thing I wonder about the “Born Alive” act is what they expect be done. Most of the cases it applies to involve induced labor abortions, in which labor is induced before viability. I believe the baby in the Jill stanek case was 21 weeks. I know women who’ve delivered at that point who never really considered any form of life support because they were told it would be futile, and they didn’t want to put the baby throug any unnecessary pain. What specific measures does the law state must be taken?

Again, I’m not talking about cases like Gianna Jessen’s, but rather Jill stanek’s.
 
The thing I wonder about the “Born Alive” act is what they expect be done. Most of the cases it applies to involve induced labor abortions, in which labor is induced before viability. I believe the baby in the Jill stanek case was 21 weeks. I know women who’ve delivered at that point who never really considered any form of life support because they were told it would be futile, and they didn’t want to put the baby throug any unnecessary pain. What specific measures does the law state must be taken?

Again, I’m not talking about cases like Gianna Jessen’s, but rather Jill stanek’s.
Well, they certainly did not want for the baby to be left alone in a dark room without the comfort and compassion of another human as he/she was left to die.
 
Of course Obama supported infanticide. It is the logical conclusion of his pro-abortion views and this is a main reason why I refuse to vote for him.
 
Well, they certainly did not want for the baby to be left alone in a dark room without the comfort and compassion of another human as he/she was left to die.
But how do you write that into law?
 
ilga.gov/senate/transcripts/strans92/ST033001.pdf

Obama: “That determination then, essentially, if it was accepted by a court, would forbid abortions to take place.” (that is if an aborted baby survived and was born alive, it would be considered a child, and could not be killed) “I mean, it - - it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an antiabortion statute. For that purpose, I think it would probably be found unconstitutional”.

It doesn’t get any sicker than this folks!
Disgusting.
 
Why is allowing your baby to die cold and alone in a hosptial utility room an “choice”, but if left neglected at home and the baby died it would be homicide?
Because in the hospital, the baby dies under the supervision of “health” “care” “providers”.

Obama voted against the law when it is was in the form accepted by NARAL. talk about being pro-baby-killing.
 
The thing I wonder about the “Born Alive” act is what they expect be done. Most of the cases it applies to involve induced labor abortions, in which labor is induced before viability. I believe the baby in the Jill stanek case was 21 weeks. I know women who’ve delivered at that point who never really considered any form of life support because they were told it would be futile, and they didn’t want to put the baby throug any unnecessary pain. What specific measures does the law state must be taken?

Again, I’m not talking about cases like Gianna Jessen’s, but rather Jill stanek’s.
In some states abortion is legal up to 7 to 9 months, up until the umbilical chord is cut. In a botched abortion, these babies would survive. My 6 year old son was born at 7 months, (2lbs 11oz) my wife had to have an emergency c-section. He was in an incubator for 5-weeks, now he is the tallest in his first grade class and tallest in his Cub-Scout pack. Some late term abortion survivors were placed instead of an incubator, a refrigerated cold box to die of thermal exposure, because the intention was abortion. Notwithstanding that this is a viable baby, protected by the Constitution. This is what Obama, Notre Dame’s abortion messiah was fighting for.

youtube.com/watch?v=481bgi5Du0s&feature=player_embedded
 
In some states abortion is legal up to 7 to 9 months, up until the umbilical chord is cut. In a botched abortion, these babies would survive. My 6 year old son was born at 7 months, (2lbs 11oz) my wife had to have an emergency c-section. He was in an incubator for 5-weeks, now he is the tallest in his first grade class and tallest in his Cub-Scout pack. Some late term abortion survivors were placed instead of an incubator, a refrigerated cold box to die of thermal exposure, because the intention was abortion. Notwithstanding that this is a viable baby, protected by the Constitution. This is what Obama, Notre Dame’s abortion messiah was fighting for.

youtube.com/watch?v=481bgi5Du0s&feature=player_embedded
And is still fighting for. Now, he wants people of faith to provide and PAY for: contraception, sterilization and last but not least abortifacients. (which they don’t seem to be mentioning in a lot of the media) Abortifacients are not the same thing as contraceptive measures…abortifacients CAUSE AN ABORTION…instead of being done surgically, a series of pills are taken causing an abortion. This man is either not very informed about Church teaching or he just plain doesn’t care. He is being influenced by pure evil.

If this were about animals, Peta would be all over him. As far as the infant born alive act…this is old news. This was brought up numerous times on Fox News in the last election. People were then encouraged to check it out for themselves. And Catholics still voted for him. It’s how anti life society has become, even some Catholics. Disgusting doesn’t really even describe it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top