Obama vs Romney, who are you voting for and why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rafael502
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
I generally of the opinion that regardless which of the two plants win the election, there will be some changes in the window treatments, but the furniture will stay the same. I MUST abide by my conscience, and my conscience tells me than neither of them deserve the office for which they are running.
However, you do live in the real world, and one of them will win–it behooves every Catholic to pick the person who will do less harm (if you prefer to think of it that wat). I personally believe Romney will do far more good.
 
Obama isn’t anything like Hitler. He’s more like Carter. While I despise Hitler, he was much more successful and capable than Obama. Obama couldn’t lead a group of schoolchildren.
Bit of hyperbole I think. Ever see pictures of Germany after Hitler’s reign. We are not that bad, yet, well maybe Detroit. 😃
 
Obama isn’t anything like Hitler. He’s more like Carter. While I despise Hitler, he was much more successful and capable than Obama. Obama couldn’t lead a group of schoolchildren.
A left-handed compliment if I ever saw one! Hitler was certainly an efficient leader, which only goes to show that leadership skills are NOT everything. Carter, I think, was in a class of his own regarding incompetence. However, the Israeli-Egyptian peace accord was a major achievement of his administration.
 
Obama isn’t anything like Hitler. He’s more like Carter. While I despise Hitler, he was much more successful and capable than Obama. Obama couldn’t lead a group of schoolchildren.
What are you even talking about? Hitler was more successful than Obama? How so? Starting and losing a world war while systematically killing millions of people makes you successful? Honestly, what are you talking about?
 
What are you even talking about? Hitler was more successful than Obama? How so? Starting and losing a world war while systematically killing millions of people makes you successful? Honestly, what are you talking about?
He did much of what he started out to do…much more than Obama has been able to accomplish. That said, as others have noticed, I was employing hyperbole and sarcasm to state that Obama has been an utter failure as president. Even commentators on the Left remarked on his poor leadership skills…until they had to fall back in line for his re-election. I can dig up the old articles, if you don’t believe me.
 
Close. We did have prior warning, or at least the ambassador himself did. Only the Obama people know whether he communicated it to anyone else. But it would have been his duty to tell them.
Regardless if it was a terrorist attack or not, the film critic at large and her boss the golfer in chief job is to secure the embassy and protect the ambassador. Contracting the job out to a British firm who hired a bunch o0f Al Qaida thugs to do the job is the height of incompetence. Only in America can this amateur act be defended.
 
An analogy.

A person has to get to a new job. The job is 30 miles from his home. There are no car pools, no trains, no buses, and no other person to give him a ride. So, he concludes that he MUST drive a car to work. Yet, the person has limited funds, so he has to choose between a 1990 Honda, or a 2000 Toyota that his neighbor will sell to him for a similar price (both cars have similar attributes and are in similar condition, and there are no other alternatives, and he does not know how to ride a motorcycle, etc.).

The person looks at both cars, he has only a day or so to make up his mind. He concludes that he does not want either car because neither car meets his personal standards. He fails to get a car in the alloted time, he does not make it to his new job–he loses his job.

Was it wise for that man to not have made a choice for either car?

Decisions have consequences, so do protests, and so does doing nothing. In fact, not voting is a vote because it will him one of the candidates, while hurting the other.

Life is filled with decisions that cause us to hold our noses…we still must make them.
 
What are you even talking about? Hitler was more successful than Obama? How so? Starting and losing a world war while systematically killing millions of people makes you successful? Honestly, what are you talking about?
I’m sure Robert didn’t mean “successful” in a humane or moral sense, but rather in the sense of efficient and systematic, at least for a period of time.
 
Regardless if it was a terrorist attack or not, the film critic at large and her boss the golfer in chief job is to secure the embassy and protect the ambassador. Contracting the job out to a British firm who hired a bunch o0f Al Qaida thugs to do the job is the height of incompetence. Only in America can this amateur act be defended.
Is Mitt then the Mormon in Chief?
 
I’m sure Robert didn’t mean “successful” in a humane or moral sense, but rather in the sense of efficient and systematic, at least for a period of time.
Maybe he just meant Hitler didn’t lead from behind!
 
And he will destroy the lower and middle class while changing nothing about gay marriage or abortion.
Exactly. People are giving Obama way too much credit. Do people really think he is responsible for 1 million aborted babies per year? How about if we ignore the fact that Romneycare resulted in abortions being covered with a $50 co-pay.
 
I’m sure Robert didn’t mean “successful” in a humane or moral sense, but rather in the sense of efficient and systematic, at least for a period of time.
Exactly. As I stated, I despise Hitler. He was an evil man. Obama is not evil…just a weak, misguided leader.
 
Exactly. People are giving Obama way too much credit. Do people really think he is responsible for 1 million aborted babies per year? How about if we ignore the fact that Romneycare resulted in abortions being covered with a $50 co-pay.
Obama in responsible in that he gives our dollars to foreign countries to fund abortions,he has PP in his back pocket,his record shows how pro abort he is.
 
Exactly. People are giving Obama way too much credit. Do people really think he is responsible for 1 million aborted babies per year? How about if we ignore the fact that Romneycare resulted in abortions being covered with a $50 co-pay.
Balderdash. It was only under Republican presidents that anyone has done anything in limiting abortion. They’ve been struck down by Democrat Presidents or their SCOTUS appointees too many times to count.
 
I’ll vote for Mitt, albiet without much enthusiasm. The president’s active attack on the pro life movement and religion-informed ethics is among the many reasons I cannot support him. Mitt is closer to my policy positions (at least during this campaign cycle) so he gets my vote but he is a weak campaigner and I have doubts about his political sense and leadership skills.
 
I am just wondering if Romney’s plan of cutting taxes for the rich goes along with Mark 10:17-25.
There is no “cutting taxes for the rich”.

It’s called “not raising taxes during a recession”.

What kind of doublethink does one need to deduct “keeping current rate = tax cut”???

Does 2+2=7,821.47513?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top