Obnoxious Protestant Propoganda

[bluerose]

I thought this was not allowed because it is self communicating?

No, no, no. The device in question is a shallow dish (for the Hosts), with a small cup in the center (for the Precious Blood.) The PRIEST holds it so he can distribute communion by intinction (dipping the Host into the Precious Blood) without having to juggle a chalice as well.

The communicants NEVER touch the vessels and only the priest touches the host with his fingers.

Hope this clears things up.

 

[Fred_4]

I thought it was funny how the site claims to tell the reader what the Bible says, but repeatedly uses the word “juice” instead of “wine.” If they can’t even get the text of Scripture correctly, why would anyone believe what they say Scripture means?

 

[estesbob]

No, no, no. The device in question is a shallow dish (for the Hosts), with a small cup in the center (for the Precious Blood.) The PRIEST holds it so he can distribute communion by intinction (dipping the Host into the Precious Blood) without having to juggle a chalice as well.

The communicants NEVER touch the vessels and only the priest touches the host with his fingers.

Hope this clears things up.

Thanks! I figured there must be somethng I was missing

 

[dandn5000]

I thought it was funny how the site claims to tell the reader what the Bible says, but repeatedly uses the word “juice” instead of “wine.” If they can’t even get the text of Scripture correctly, why would anyone believe what they say Scripture means?

I think its because many Protestant churches use grape juice.

 

[holdencaulfield]

I thought it was funny how the site claims to tell the reader what the Bible says, but repeatedly uses the word “juice” instead of “wine.” If they can’t even get the text of Scripture correctly, why would anyone believe what they say Scripture means?

That is funny, I missed that.

 

[holdencaulfield]

I think its because many Protestant churches use grape juice.

It is. Honestly this is one of the biggest blasphemies that the Protestants do. I guess they can’t help it, they don’t know any better.

 

[Tim_Kirchoff]

It is. Honestly this is one of the biggest blasphemies that the Protestants do. I guess they can’t help it, they don’t know any better.

They think alcohol is evil, or something to that effect. In that case, Noah was hardly a righteous man at all, considering he was the first man to make wine!

 

[grandmaM]

I know, but honestly I found it almost funny. They talked about how Transubstantiation wasn’t taught in the Bible; but as I open my Bible right now…wow look it’s right there.

“But here is the bread that comes down from heaven, which a man may eat and not die. I am the living bread that came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever. This bread is my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.” (John 6:50-51)

I think that they should offer reading classes at the local Protestant Church then they might be able to understand the Bible more clearly.

It’s because we believe it is symbolic, as is John 15:5,
“I am the vine,you are the branches; he who abides in Me and I in him, bears much fruit, for apart from Me you can do nothing.”

Grace to you

 

[JMBNH]

That site is a Church of Christ one so ridiculous even by Protestant standards. Think they’re basically Baptists except for they believe in the necessity of Baptism for salvation (yet still refuse it to infants)

 

[bluerose]

OH MY GOSH!!!

Ya’ll are NOT gonna believe this!

If you all check the Family Life forum, you’ll see there was a thread there a couple weeks ago about Protestant weddings and I told about how my husband was asked to be best man. (Here is the thread, go to post #13)
forums.catholic-questions.org/showthread.php?t=213795

I followed the link provided in the OP, searched to find “where Christians are assembling in my home town” and THAT’S the church my husband’s friend attends!

I’m so tripped out, I’ll be back later!

 

[holdencaulfield]

They think alcohol is evil, or something to that effect. In that case, Noah was hardly a righteous man at all, considering he was the first man to make wine!

I don’t know where they get the “alcohol is evil” thing from. Yes drinking to excess is wrong. However I see nothing wrong with alcohol. Besides none of this is even taught in the Bible.

 

[holdencaulfield]

It’s because we believe it is symbolic, as is John 15:5,
“I am the vine,you are the branches; he who abides in Me and I in him, bears much fruit, for apart from Me you can do nothing.”

Grace to you

I figured you would use this quote. Christ refers to the Holy Eucharist in both symbolic and literal terms. If you really want to get in an argument about this, go ahead. However you are going to have to deny what the Bible says.

 

[cascherman]

Wow, I wonder how Christ likes his blood being called ‘Juice’. Sick.

 

[bluerose]

I went back to that link and decided to see what ELSE “true Christians” believe…

Check THIS out:

1. 
   ]“Sex when desired” by either partner: 1 Cor 7:3-4.
   If your husband wants sex, it is a sin to refuse him. If your wife wants sex, it is a sin to refuse her. Bible sex is always consensual… your spouse asks, and you always say yes. Many a marriage can be saved by implementing this one rule alone. When you get married, you lose control of your body to your spouse. Studies have shown that about an equal amount of married women want more sex than their husbands, as married men who want more sex than their wives desire. It would be nice to match men and women up as marriage partners based upon their sex drive it would be great. But unfortunately this is often not the case. One partner wants sex more often than the other. In these situations, the partner that doesn’t desire sex must immediately consent to their spouse. Scripture is very clear about this although most Christians have missed this.*
   *]1 Cor 7:3-4 also means that your spouse has control over you the way you dress, your hair cut and the way you physically look.
   
   For example, if a man has a unibrow, and his wife doesn’t like it, he must obey his wife and trim it off. If a man likes his wife with long blonde hair, then she must grow it long and dye it blonde. If a wife doesn’t likes her husband’s choice of cologne or a certain colour of shirt, then he gets rid of them. Each person is to present his body in a way that pleases their spouse, not merely themselves.
   
   -----------------------------
   
   I also find it interesting, if you’ll check their little Interactive Bible menu, that the link on the bottom right says “Sola Scriptura: Bible Only! No Tradition”. And yet, the page about Transubstantiation lists an awful lot of early Fathers of the Church as sources to support their claim.
   
   Why isn’t the Bible enough?

 

[mangy_dog]

This is so wrong. It’s amazing the lies that Protestants will tell about the Catholic Church so that they can lie to people. Here’s an example

Calling all Catholics! Lets argue about this and show how ridiculous this propaganda is.

You answer like I do: Calling all protestants, your faith is incomplete; your bible is incomplete; you have nothing to teach me because your sources are incomplete. You are protestants - you protest against the one, true church that Christ intended to exist after His ascension into heaven and of which He left Peter as its first Pope…263 popes later to Pope Benedict XVI.
Protestants - return home!!

 

[holdencaulfield]

Wow, I wonder how Christ likes his blood being called ‘Juice’. Sick.

Yes that’s extremely blasphemous.

 

[holdencaulfield]

I went back to that link and decided to see what ELSE “true Christians” believe…

Check THIS out:

1. 
   ]“Sex when desired*” by either partner: 1 Cor 7:3-4.
   If your husband wants sex, it is a sin to refuse him. If your wife wants sex, it is a sin to refuse her. Bible sex is always consensual… your spouse asks, and you always say yes. Many a marriage can be saved by implementing this one rule alone. When you get married, you lose control of your body to your spouse. Studies have shown that about an equal amount of married women want more sex than their husbands, as married men who want more sex than their wives desire. It would be nice to match men and women up as marriage partners based upon their sex drive it would be great. But unfortunately this is often not the case. One partner wants sex more often than the other. In these situations, the partner that doesn’t desire sex must immediately consent to their spouse. Scripture is very clear about this although most Christians have missed this.
   *]1 Cor 7:3-4 also means that your spouse has control over you the way you dress, your hair cut and the way you physically look.
   
   For example, if a man has a unibrow, and his wife doesn’t like it, he must obey his wife and trim it off. If a man likes his wife with long blonde hair, then she must grow it long and dye it blonde. If a wife doesn’t likes her husband’s choice of cologne or a certain colour of shirt, then he gets rid of them. Each person is to present his body in a way that pleases their spouse, not merely themselves.
   
   -----------------------------
   
   I also find it interesting, if you’ll check their little Interactive Bible menu, that the link on the bottom right says “Sola Scriptura: Bible Only! No Tradition”. And yet, the page about Transubstantiation lists an awful lot of early Fathers of the Church as sources to support their claim.
   
   Why isn’t the Bible enough?

1. 
   This is sick and obviously not what St. Paul was intending. This is not the way sex should be. People should respect their partner, not just see them as a tool to obtain pleasure with.
   
   The quote was a referencing adultery. And how married couples belong to each other and each other alone. They took this way out of context. This is what happens to most Protestants who don’t even read the Bible. They just take things out of context.